IFS Applications is presented by the vendor as an agile application suite that offers enterprise resource planning (ERP), enterprise asset management (EAM) and enterprise project management, handling 4 core processes: Service & Asset Management Full Enterprise Asset Management (EAM), Maintenance Repair and Overhaul (MRO) and Field Service Management (FSM) Manufacturing Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) with support for process manufacturing, discrete manufacturing…
N/A
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Score 9.1 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Dynamics 365 for Finance and Operations (or Dynamics AX) was an ERP product in the Dynamics family. It has been split into separate Dynamics 365 products and is no longer available.
N/A
Pricing
IFS Applications
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IFS Applications
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IFS Applications
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Features
IFS Applications
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
2.6
Ratings
94% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.8
Ratings
20% above category average
Pay calculation
4.00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
4.00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Direct deposit files
3.00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
8.5
Ratings
11% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
7.0
Ratings
8% below category average
API for custom integration
8.50 Ratings
5.00 Ratings
Plug-ins
8.50 Ratings
8.90 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
9.7
Ratings
17% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
6.0
Ratings
31% below category average
Single sign-on capability
10.00 Ratings
5.00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
9.50 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
7.8
Ratings
8% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.3
Ratings
14% above category average
Dashboards
7.00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Standard reports
7.50 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Custom reports
9.00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
7.4
Ratings
4% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.2
Ratings
6% above category average
Accounts payable
9.00 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Accounts receivable
9.00 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Global Financial Support
9.00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
8.50 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
8.00 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
8.50 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Standardized Processes
9.00 Ratings
8.90 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
8.6
Ratings
8% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.7
Ratings
10% above category average
Inventory tracking
8.50 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Automatic reordering
9.00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Location management
9.00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
5.4
Ratings
37% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
7.6
Ratings
3% below category average
Pricing
8.00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Order entry
8.50 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Credit card processing
6.00 Ratings
3.00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold
6.50 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Order Orchestration
6.50 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
3.4
Ratings
75% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.7
Ratings
15% above category average
Billing Management
6.50 Ratings
8.90 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management
7.50 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management
7.50 Ratings
8.90 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting
6.50 Ratings
8.90 Ratings
Period Close
8.50 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
2.7
Ratings
95% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.9
Ratings
16% above category average
Budgeting and Forecasting
3.00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Project Costing
6.00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Cost Capture
5.00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Capital Project Management
2.00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance
2.00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition
2.00 Ratings
8.90 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
3.6
Ratings
63% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.8
Ratings
24% above category average
Project Planning and Scheduling
10.00 Ratings
8.90 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers
9.00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality
8.00 Ratings
6.00 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools
8.00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
10.0
Ratings
30% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.7
Ratings
16% above category average
Award Lifecycle Management
10.00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
3.3
Ratings
71% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.7
Ratings
22% above category average
Bids Analyzed and Compared
8.00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Contract Authoring
7.00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Contract Repository
7.00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated
9.50 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Supplier Management
9.50 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
4.6
Ratings
35% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.8
Ratings
30% above category average
Risk Repository
8.00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Control Management
8.50 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments
8.00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Issue Detection
6.00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Remediation and Certification
7.00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
6.3
Ratings
6% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.5
Ratings
24% above category average
Transportation Planning and Optimization
7.00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management
7.00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management
6.00 Ratings
8.90 Ratings
Fulfillment Management
5.00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management
8.00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
6.2
Ratings
18% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
7.7
Ratings
4% above category average
Production Process Design
8.50 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Production Management
8.00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Configuration Management
7.50 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Work Execution
8.50 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs
9.00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
8.5
Ratings
18% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
9.2
Ratings
26% above category average
Forecasting
7.50 Ratings
9.90 Ratings
Inventory Planning
9.00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Performance Monitoring
9.00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Product A and Product B
Not every Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) System does not cover all the industry verticals and all the functionalities and requirements for a specific industry as built-in features. Although IFS Applications does not completely cover all the requirements and all the industry verticals, it can be implemented for any industrial company with minimum configurations and customization, which is very good when implementing an ERP system. Since it supports web and mobile versions of the application as well, the users ind it easy to use.
It integrates fully with the other Microsoft software we use daily, and this coordination speeds up our work and gives us the agility to run easily. For example, in a purchase inquiry, the customer, after submitting a request, identifies the teams that should work on the project, and if they need further review by other people, they are added to the process, and everything is managed seamlessly rather than the sales process. Get the result as fast as possible.
Sales Ledger. Currently, the idea behind the sales ledger module is that the company prepares a sales order for another company. I would prefer the developers consider the scenario where a sales order is prepared for the same company but for another branch or unit.
Postings of issues items are currently possible but none of the modules caters to "departmental material or item request". Further tweaks have been done on our Project Module to cater for this but it's not entirely perfect. This will enable aid in cost allocation per departmental request of materials or items.
Challenges with the bank module - does not allow for easily reconciliation as the statement from the banks can not be uploaded except for specific format.
Microsoft Dynamics continues to evolve by bringing more functionality to the customer. Also there are several independent software providers that offer a wide range of solutions for vertical markets.
In overall, the companies get many advantages, where we can forget most of the things which can be considered for room for improvement. The user interface is good. It supports mobile versions an has several mobile applications for specific areas with Android, IOS and Windows versions. It allows several deployment options such as remote hosting, IFS Cloud hosting and on-premise hosting of the servers. IFS Applications can be easily and safely integrated with other systems.
Overall the product does what we need it to do in order for us to function as a company. While there are some concerns over ongoing costs, the belief is, once we have it fully acclimated to our business the cost should settle into alignment with our original expectations. The new features that are consistently being added do add value to the product as they are usually customer request directed.
Some integration and high volume ramping challenges, particularly with BizTalk and SQL Server, but getting sorted out. Outages over time appeared to be more dependent on integration complexity than AX MES.
Some integration and high volume ramping challenges, particularly with BizTalk and SQL Server, but getting sorted out. Outages over time appeared to be more dependent on integration complexity than AX MES.
We have been unable to get answers to our questions, solutions to our problems, and they don't seem interested in working in the construction industry.
We use a 3rd-party Microsoft Partner for the system. They are responsive and very knowledgeable. While costs have been mentioned several times in this review they are very aware of costs and have developers who are more economical they use to help offset the level of work required to meet our changes and fix our issues.
It took a lot of work, but Microsoft ultimately did a good job with in-person training, including being onsite in multiple global locations for extended periods.
Our solution deviated from a number of key out-of-the-box standards that were included in Online training. We just used that for introduction to the general functionality.
Some rough spots, but ultimately worked out. The contract didn't appear to be structured to support the level of overlapping facility deployments required to meet timeline commitments. Merging cultures on the program was also challenging. Overall, not an easy implementation by any stretch. Everyone did the best they could.
Microsoft AX, QAD (in continuation of our previous ERP), Sage X3 was an out of the box ERP that was part of initial RFP. We have chosen IFS based on the compromise between costs & budget, functionality, technical features, and feedback from similar customers that gave their feedback. The project manager team and qualification level of technical or consultant teams were differentiating factors too. Finally IFS application was named in the Gartner’s mid-market ERP Magic Quadrant, along with SAP, and helped us to finalize our choice
Cost and local regional compliance were primary factors in chosing Microsoft Dynamics AX over SAP Access Control for our need. SAP AC would have provided easier integration into our primary ERP system SAP but there were some regional compliance with ASEAN countries as well as the cost of implementation was more over Microsoft Dynamics AX.