IFS Applications is presented by the vendor as an agile application suite that offers enterprise resource planning (ERP), enterprise asset management (EAM) and enterprise project management, handling 4 core processes: Service & Asset Management Full Enterprise Asset Management (EAM), Maintenance Repair and Overhaul (MRO) and Field Service Management (FSM) Manufacturing Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) with support for process manufacturing, discrete manufacturing…
N/A
Mhelpdesk
Score 7.3 out of 10
N/A
Mhelpdesk is a field service software solution that manages field technicians, work orders, employee scheduling, and client billing. By combining and integrating multiple business management tools, Mhelpdesk provides a solution that eliminates double-data entry while giving business owners visibility over their field technicians in real-time.
$169
per month
Pricing
IFS Applications
Mhelpdesk
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
mHelpDesk
$169
per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IFS Applications
Mhelpdesk
Free Trial
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IFS Applications
Mhelpdesk
Features
IFS Applications
Mhelpdesk
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
2.6
Ratings
94% below category average
Mhelpdesk
-
Ratings
Pay calculation
4.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
4.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Direct deposit files
3.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
8.5
Ratings
11% above category average
Mhelpdesk
-
Ratings
API for custom integration
8.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Plug-ins
8.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
9.7
Ratings
17% above category average
Mhelpdesk
-
Ratings
Single sign-on capability
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
9.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
7.8
Ratings
8% above category average
Mhelpdesk
-
Ratings
Dashboards
7.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standard reports
7.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Custom reports
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
7.4
Ratings
4% below category average
Mhelpdesk
-
Ratings
Accounts payable
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Accounts receivable
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Global Financial Support
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
8.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
8.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standardized Processes
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
8.6
Ratings
8% above category average
Mhelpdesk
-
Ratings
Inventory tracking
8.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Automatic reordering
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Location management
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
5.4
Ratings
37% below category average
Mhelpdesk
-
Ratings
Pricing
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order entry
8.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Credit card processing
6.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold
6.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order Orchestration
6.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
3.4
Ratings
75% below category average
Mhelpdesk
-
Ratings
Billing Management
6.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management
7.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management
7.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting
6.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Period Close
8.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
2.7
Ratings
95% below category average
Mhelpdesk
-
Ratings
Budgeting and Forecasting
3.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Costing
6.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost Capture
5.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Capital Project Management
2.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance
2.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition
2.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
3.6
Ratings
63% below category average
Mhelpdesk
-
Ratings
Project Planning and Scheduling
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
10.0
Ratings
29% above category average
Mhelpdesk
-
Ratings
Award Lifecycle Management
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
3.3
Ratings
71% below category average
Mhelpdesk
-
Ratings
Bids Analyzed and Compared
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract Authoring
7.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract Repository
7.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated
9.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Supplier Management
9.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
4.6
Ratings
35% below category average
Mhelpdesk
-
Ratings
Risk Repository
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Control Management
8.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Issue Detection
6.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Remediation and Certification
7.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
6.3
Ratings
6% below category average
Mhelpdesk
-
Ratings
Transportation Planning and Optimization
7.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management
7.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management
6.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Fulfillment Management
5.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
6.2
Ratings
18% below category average
Mhelpdesk
-
Ratings
Production Process Design
8.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Production Management
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Configuration Management
7.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Work Execution
8.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
8.5
Ratings
18% above category average
Mhelpdesk
-
Ratings
Forecasting
7.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Inventory Planning
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance Monitoring
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Product A and Product B
Not every Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) System does not cover all the industry verticals and all the functionalities and requirements for a specific industry as built-in features. Although IFS Applications does not completely cover all the requirements and all the industry verticals, it can be implemented for any industrial company with minimum configurations and customization, which is very good when implementing an ERP system. Since it supports web and mobile versions of the application as well, the users ind it easy to use.
Mhelpdesk is perfect for smaller companies and mid-sized companies I would say. Larger companies may need something a little more advanced for lack of better words or able to handle thousands upon thousands of constant work orders, etc. Smaller companies or companies that are mid-size would benefit from this program the most as it provides the necessary programming to succeed along with its ease of use.
I spoke about reporting, perhaps they can make this system a little better by integrating new ways to report, perhaps even several options .
The mobile app sometimes lags which can cause a few issues, nothing too major however.
Although the customer support provided by Mhelpdesk is relatively great, there have been times when things go unsolved or not taken care of within the amount of time needed.
In overall, the companies get many advantages, where we can forget most of the things which can be considered for room for improvement. The user interface is good. It supports mobile versions an has several mobile applications for specific areas with Android, IOS and Windows versions. It allows several deployment options such as remote hosting, IFS Cloud hosting and on-premise hosting of the servers. IFS Applications can be easily and safely integrated with other systems.
We have been unable to get answers to our questions, solutions to our problems, and they don't seem interested in working in the construction industry.
Microsoft AX, QAD (in continuation of our previous ERP), Sage X3 was an out of the box ERP that was part of initial RFP. We have chosen IFS based on the compromise between costs & budget, functionality, technical features, and feedback from similar customers that gave their feedback. The project manager team and qualification level of technical or consultant teams were differentiating factors too. Finally IFS application was named in the Gartner’s mid-market ERP Magic Quadrant, along with SAP, and helped us to finalize our choice
When we first started using Mhelpdesk, RepairShopr was just a blip on our radar and didn't have the feature-set that Mhelpdesk did. RepairShopr looked great, but the Mhelpdesk had a lot more features. Every 6 months or so, I'd check on RepairShopr and it was growing fast and adding new features all the time. After a few years - the difference was night and day so we switched to RepairShopr and it's been a much better fit for our business.
We are 6 months into it with a 50% rollout completed. We need more time to pass and full rollout to be completed before making a hard statement as to the ROI.
We have already seen greater efficiency in dispatching techs in regards to how many projects per day may be handled (we know of their downtime) and travel time mangement (by being able to map the locations and track them easier).
No negative impacts on ROI have yet to be seen nor are they projected.