TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    XRay by Idera

    Score7.2 out of 10
    N/AXRay, now from Idera, is a manual and automated test management framework for quality assurance in Jira.N/A

    Tricentis qTest

    Score9 out of 10
    N/ATricentis qTest (formerly QASymphony) provides enterprise-level agile testing tools giving businesses visibility and control needed to ensure application quality in fast-paced development environments. Tricentis and QASymphony merged in summer 2018.

    $1,200

    per year per user

    Pricing
    XRay by IderaTricentis qTest
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    XRay by IderaTricentis qTest
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    YesYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalOptional
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    XRay by IderaTricentis qTest
    Considered Both Products
    IDERA (an Idera, Inc. company)
    No answer on this topic
    Tricentis
    Chose Tricentis qTest
    I'm not the decision maker, so I can't provide objective comparison criteria, but I can say that Tricentis QTest is a reliable tool for Test Management.
    Incentivized
    Chose Tricentis qTest
    Tricentis was better suited to our processes, tools integration and migration of data from our prior tool set.
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    74%
    Would buy again
    23 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    80%
    Delivers good value for the price
    20 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    90%
    Happy with the feature set
    28 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    75%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    15 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    88%
    Implementation went as expected
    23 Answers
    Features
    XRay by IderaTricentis qTest
    Test Management
    Comparison of Test Management features of XRay by Idera and Tricentis qTest
    Feature
    XRay by Idera
    -
    Ratings
    Tricentis qTest
    7.5
    27 Ratings
    7% below category average
    Centralized test management00 Ratings7.426 Ratings
    Manage test hosts and schedules00 Ratings7.223 Ratings
    Map tests to user stories00 Ratings7.68 Ratings
    Test execution reporting00 Ratings7.426 Ratings
    Defect management00 Ratings7.922 Ratings
    User Ratings
    XRay by IderaTricentis qTest
    Likelihood to Recommend
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.1
    (29 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.0
    (2 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    1.0
    (1 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    5.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    XRay by IderaTricentis qTest
    Likelihood to Recommend
    IDERA (an Idera, Inc. company)
    No answers on this topic
    Tricentis
    Tricentis qTest integrates seamlessly with Jira, making it ideal for teams that manage user stories and defects in Jira while keeping test cases and execution in qTest. When paired with automation tools like tosca, Selenium, or WebdriverIO, qTest is excellent for aggregating both manual and automated test results in one place.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    IDERA (an Idera, Inc. company)
    No answers on this topic
    Tricentis
    • As a fresher, when I started using qTest it was very handy and easy to understand.
    • It helps us trace the test cases that are used to test the quality in a single location
    • The main thing is its integration with JIRA as soon as we create a ticket we would be getting all the requirements in the qTest so it became easy for me
    Read full review
    Cons
    IDERA (an Idera, Inc. company)
    No answers on this topic
    Tricentis
    • In requirements , we can't add multiple test cases at once, or search multiple cases at once, need to do one by one. Here actually qtest needs to improve.
    • Linking cloud hosted qtest and on-premise TOSCA is very difficult especially when you are working with client system with security wall. It requires tunnelling software which is not recommended.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    IDERA (an Idera, Inc. company)
    No answers on this topic
    Tricentis
    This has been a core QA management tool for our organization and integrates well with our other SDLC platforms (Azure DevOps/Jira/Katalon).
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    IDERA (an Idera, Inc. company)
    No answers on this topic
    Tricentis
    qTest is actually intuitive and user-friendly, despite my other scathing review aspects
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    IDERA (an Idera, Inc. company)
    No answers on this topic
    Tricentis
    The actual answer is 0. I have never experienced worse support, whether personal or professional
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    IDERA (an Idera, Inc. company)
    No answers on this topic
    Tricentis
    Again, supporting documentation could have been a lot better
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    IDERA (an Idera, Inc. company)
    No answers on this topic
    Tricentis
    All of them offer formidable solutions in the test management realm, but each one caters to different niche and need. qTest distinguishes itself with its deep integration capabilities, especially with Agile and DevOps tools, enabling streamlined CI/CD process. Its modern, user-centric interface contrasts with ALM's more dated appearance and complex setup. While TestRail provides a clean user experience and caters to a broad spectrum of business, qTest's scalability, from SMBs to large enterprises, stands out. PractiTest's cloud-based solution is geared towards mid-sized companies, but qTest's flexibility, advanced analytics, and robust reporting grant teams actionable insights. qTest' approach to a more holistic test management closely aligning with modern software development practices
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    IDERA (an Idera, Inc. company)
    No answers on this topic
    Tricentis
    • In comparison to other Testing tools, Tricentis qTest was the most expensive.
    • We were able to quickly bring international users up to speed on how to use the tool.
    • The ability to clone a project rather than create a new one from scratch was a valuable time saver.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Tricentis qTest Screenshots

    Screenshot of Customizable analytics and reports can be shared across the organization - additional read license requiredScreenshot of Centrally manage automated testing and environments, as well as schedule and or kickoff automated testing with any open source or proprietary toolScreenshot of qTest allows for true test case sharing across teams and projects to help standardize and scale knowledge and best practicesScreenshot of qTest integrates in real-time with Jira for full traceability to requirements during Agile test and developmentScreenshot of Build custom, event-driven workflows with any third-party solution, including ChatOps tools like Slack and Microsoft Teams, to streamline testing and drive collaborationScreenshot of Tricentis qTest comes with over 60 out-of-the-box metrics, with drag-and-drop capabilities to build custom dashboards