Icinga vs. StatusCake

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Icinga
Score 7.8 out of 10
N/A
Icinga is an open source network monitoring platform. It includes automation, modularized integration packages, and prebuilt alerts and reporting capabilities.N/A
StatusCake
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
StatusCake is a website online tool, with uptime monitoring. The solution provides alerts for server and domain issues, 5-second check rates on website downtime, page speed testing and monitoring for SSL certificates through Slack, SMS & email. It also provides a public status page for website downtime, dashboards showing website performance in real-time, and sub-accounts to give a team access. And it generate in-depth reports on website performance.
$24.49
per month 100 monitors, 1 minute test intervals
Pricing
IcingaStatusCake
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Superior
$24.49
per month 100 monitors, 1 minute test intervals
Business
$79.99
per month 300 monitors, 30 second test intervals
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IcingaStatusCake
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsDiscounts available for annual pricing.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IcingaStatusCake
Best Alternatives
IcingaStatusCake
Small Businesses
ConnectWise Automate
ConnectWise Automate
Score 8.3 out of 10
Panda Systems Management
Panda Systems Management
Score 9.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Logz.io
Logz.io
Score 7.0 out of 10
ManageEngine ADAudit Plus
ManageEngine ADAudit Plus
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
ScienceLogic SL1
ScienceLogic SL1
Score 8.9 out of 10
ManageEngine ADAudit Plus
ManageEngine ADAudit Plus
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IcingaStatusCake
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
IcingaStatusCake
Likelihood to Recommend
If you're running bare-metal in a datacenter and your hosts are fairly static, it's probably okay to use something like Icinga to monitor your systems. In general, I would not recommend using any monitoring software based on Nagios (Icinga is a fork of Nagios) due to the outdated concepts inherent in those systems. There are a number of good SaaS monitoring solutions which are superior and several open source projects which implement an automation-centric approach to monitoring
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Pros
  • I think Icinga has a great search feature. I can always search for the hosts, host groups, or check names. When using just regular Nagios, I don't recall being able to do this search.
  • The fact that I can use Active Directory or LDAP for logins is a great feature.
  • If you are familiar with Nagios, it's very simple to combine the two products to get a polished finished product.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Cons
  • Decluttering - the dashboard seems to get very overwhelming
  • Segregation - would be helpful to split environments or clients into different areas
  • Alerting
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Likelihood to Renew
Icinga is a solid solution which does everything it promises. It is backwards compatible with most Nagios instances, making the transition very easy. Once you get the hang of installing new plugins and editing configuration files expanding its monitoring capabilities are easy.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Icinga was initially a fork of Nagios. Over time, the configuration language was replaced with something more programmatic. This configuration language is one of the big sellers of this product. It allows flexible, quick configuration of large sets of hosts and services with minimal input. Comparing it to other products like WhatsUp Gold, Zenoss, Zabbix, etc., it stands out as incredibly flexible. Adding additional features to Icinga can be as simple as searching for them online. And if they don't yet exist, there is a full API available for custom extensions.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • With one check you know which applications are faulty e.g. after an upgrade. Which is big time saver
  • You easily detect outages ion the applications so that your customer ideally does not even realize there was an outage.
  • Detect if the environment does deliver the same result as in the same time as before to detect shortages.
  • Additional information when debugging. Saved us several hours where we could simply point to a database which was slow.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots