IBM z/OS vs. Oracle Solaris

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM z/OS
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
IBM z/OS® is an operating system (OS) for IBM Z® mainframes, suitable for continuous, high-volume operation with high security and stability. It is designed to meet organizational requirements to improve performance for mission-critical workloads and meet future challenges.N/A
Oracle Solaris
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
Oracle Solaris is a Linux operating system which was originally developed by Sun Microsystems and became an Oracle product after the acquisition of Sun in 2010.
$1,000
per year
Pricing
IBM z/OSOracle Solaris
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
1 Year Subscription
$1,000.00
per year
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM z/OSOracle Solaris
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM z/OSOracle Solaris
Best Alternatives
IBM z/OSOracle Solaris
Small Businesses
Ubuntu
Ubuntu
Score 8.7 out of 10
Ubuntu
Ubuntu
Score 8.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)
Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)
Score 9.3 out of 10
Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)
Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)
Score 9.3 out of 10
Enterprises
Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)
Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)
Score 9.3 out of 10
Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)
Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)
Score 9.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM z/OSOracle Solaris
Likelihood to Recommend
6.4
(0 ratings)
9.3
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
5.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
6.4
(0 ratings)
6.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
6.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM z/OSOracle Solaris
Likelihood to Recommend
IBM z/OS, more specifically Omegamon, has access to a lot of relevant information for monitoring but a 90s interface with little or no ease of use and/or maintenance.
Read full review
For running Oracle databases, Solaris can't be beat. Leveraging Zones allows for virtualization out of the box. In addition, using zones with clustering can make migrating from Solaris 10 to 11 very easy. Finally, in an enterprise environment that requires 24/7 up-time and meeting SLA's, Solaris is a viable and robust choice.
Read full review
Pros
  • provides infrastructure metrics
  • provides historical transaction behavior
  • provides metrics on vital components for z/OS
Read full review
  • Live update for patching in conjunction with the package management functions. This ability to rollback is very convenient.
  • dTrace
  • Built in compliance testing.
Read full review
Cons
  • end-to-end requests
  • correlated metrics of vital components
  • facilities to consume historical transaction data
Read full review
  • Takes time to learn.
  • Integration into Microsoft's Active Directory.
Read full review
Usability
IBM needs to update, modernize and improve the usability of the Omegamon interface
Read full review
You need to take the time to learn it. It is a massive product.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
The support teams are well trained and responsive. Patches are rolled out regularly and are easy to deploy and backout.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
Stress testing and timing is key. You need test systems that mirror the live environments. User testing must be reflected in peak loads.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
IBM needs to update, modernize and improve the usability of the Omegamon interface
Read full review
Oracle Solaris is Scalable, have a good patching capability and secure by default. You want to have something that's up and running and stable, something that's not going to crash. But if we do have an issue, we can get somebody for technical support who can help us work through the problems.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • We need to have Observability on the Mainframe
Read full review
  • Possibility to migrate old servers protecting previous inversions
  • reduces implementation times and accelerates time to obtain value in the market.
Read full review
ScreenShots