TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

IBM WebSphere Hybrid Edition vs. Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes (StackRox)

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    IBM WebSphere Hybrid Edition

    Score6.7 out of 10
    N/AWebSphere Hybrid Edition from IBM is a collection of WebSphere application runtimes and modernization tools that provides support for on-premise and major public cloud deployments, in virtual machines, containers and Kubernetes. The user can choose any WebSphere edition and deploy Liberty and application modernization tools to help move to a cloud-native architecture, modernize existing applications and support an existing WebSphere estate.

    $88.50

    per month

    Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes (StackRox)

    Score9 out of 10
    N/ARed Hat Advanced Cluster Security (ACS) for Kubernetes is a Kubernetes-native security platform, equipping organizations to more securely build, deploy, and run cloud-native applications. The solution helps protect containerized Kubernetes workloads in all major clouds and hybrid platforms, including Red Hat OpenShift, IBM Cloud Kubernetes Service, Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS), Microsoft Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS), and Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE).

    $0

    per month

    Pricing
    IBM WebSphere Hybrid EditionRed Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes (StackRox)
    Editions & Modules
    Application Server
    $88.50
    per month
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    IBM WebSphere Hybrid EditionRed Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes (StackRox)
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    IBM WebSphere Hybrid EditionRed Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes (StackRox)
    Considered Both Products
    IBM
    No answer on this topic
    Red Hat
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    100%
    Would buy again
    23 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    20 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    23 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    15 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    19 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    IBM WebSphere Hybrid EditionRed Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes (StackRox)
    Application Servers
    Comparison of Application Servers features of IBM WebSphere Hybrid Edition and Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes (StackRox)
    Feature
    IBM WebSphere Hybrid Edition
    7.3
    31 Ratings
    8% below category average
    Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes (StackRox)
    -
    Ratings
    IDE support5.426 Ratings00 Ratings
    Security management8.231 Ratings00 Ratings
    Administration and management7.831 Ratings00 Ratings
    Application server performance8.131 Ratings00 Ratings
    Installation7.530 Ratings00 Ratings
    Open-source standards compliance6.626 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    IBM WebSphere Hybrid EditionRed Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes (StackRox)
    Small Businesses
    NGINX
    Score9.2 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    Oracle WebLogic Server
    Score7.4 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Enterprises
    NGINX
    Score9.2 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    IBM WebSphere Hybrid EditionRed Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes (StackRox)
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.2
    (33 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    8.5
    (4 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Usability
    8.0
    (6 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Performance
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    8.7
    (4 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    IBM WebSphere Hybrid EditionRed Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes (StackRox)
    Likelihood to Recommend
    IBM
    IBM WebSphere Hybrid edition is well-suited for the development and deployment of large enterprise-level applications such as Electronic Health Records that are used in our organization. IBM WebSphere is appropriate for organizations that require strong security and compliance as it provides a high level of security and compliance features. This works well with organizations that are subject to strict regulatory requirements, such as hospitals.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Red Hat
    No answers on this topic
    Pros
    IBM
    • IBM WebSphere Hybrid Edition has done marvelous in building and deploying Java Enterprise applications.
    • It also does well in automating deployment and scaling. This has made it easier for our organization to deploy updates to our applications.
    • IBM WebSphere Hybrid Edition does well in security by providing features that protect enterprise applications.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Red Hat
    No answers on this topic
    Cons
    IBM
    • Ease of use in terms of deployment, give simple interface to do simple stuff like Tomcat, JBoss or GlassFish.
    • Takes long time to start the server.
    • The Liferay wars need to be decorated and then deployed. Perhaps we could simplify that.
    • Some of the concepts are good for complexity that WAS can handle but could be simplified and better documented, like concepts of well and profile, context, etc.
    • A Liferay war file created using Liferay Developer studio runs fine in Tomcat, however that may not run in WAS 7.x because it needs to be decorated. I had one war for a Liferay portlet with a simple cron job, and had hard time running to WAS server. It was running on the latest free download done on my friends m/c. Other times I have seen that there are issues running a war file that runs on Tomcat but runs on WAS after lot of customization for WAS.
    • The corporations like this however, the product may need better vibrant community of users where issues can be discussed.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Red Hat
    No answers on this topic
    Likelihood to Renew
    IBM
    Mostly we will be renewing unless the strategic direction changes drastically or there are other complelling external circumstances. We've been on a multi year project to modernize our legacy applications and that effort will continue for the foreseeable future.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Red Hat
    No answers on this topic
    Usability
    IBM
    WebSphere Application Server is used across our organization. Most projects use this for Java products and applications. Being robust and scalable makes it even more usable. We love using WebSphere Application Server due to its configuration management ability made simple and vast across all java related parameters. It is dependent on the features and upgrades and IBM releases some great upgrades to WebSphere Application Server.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Red Hat
    No answers on this topic
    Performance
    IBM
    Deploys fairly quick enough and like the roll-out update feature decreasing the downtime and also plays well with other integration tools as well.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Red Hat
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    IBM
    IBM was quick to respond when we had an issue with our specific infrastructure. We raised a PMR, which they picked up quickly and updated us about every step of the way. We had an appropriate fix for quite a business critical issue within a fortnight, which was impressive!
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Red Hat
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    IBM
    Cleo Integration Clould has many bells and whistles; however, when we added more maps and trading partners, it really slowed down. We found that the Cleo support was very slow to respond and there was a language barrier. IBM Websphere had better customer support and its processing was much faster than Cleo Integration Cloud
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Red Hat
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    IBM
    • Continuous uptime of the business applications we manage
    • It's now much simpler for me to build and deploy cloud-native applications.
    • Because it can offload for me management and maintenance of the application server to IBM I can focus on the development, deployment and testing of the applications which is more important
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Red Hat
    No answers on this topic
    ScreenShots