IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data vs. Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM Watson Studio
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
IBM Watson Studio enables users to build, run and manage AI models, and optimize decisions at scale across any cloud. IBM Watson Studio enables users can operationalize AI anywhere as part of IBM Cloud Pak® for Data, the IBM data and AI platform. The vendor states the solution simplifies AI lifecycle management and accelerates time to value with an open, flexible multicloud architecture.N/A
Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft R Open and Revolution R Enterprise are big data R distribution for servers, Hadoop clusters, and data warehouses. Microsoft acquired original developer Revolution Analytics in 2016. Microsoft R is available in two editions: Microsoft R Open (formerly Revolution R Open) and Revolution R Enterprise.N/A
Pricing
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for DataMicrosoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM Watson StudioMicrosoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for DataMicrosoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
Features
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for DataMicrosoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
Platform Connectivity
Comparison of Platform Connectivity features of Product A and Product B
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
8.1
Ratings
3% below category average
Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
5.3
Ratings
45% below category average
Connect to Multiple Data Sources8.00 Ratings6.10 Ratings
Extend Existing Data Sources8.00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Automatic Data Format Detection10.00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
MDM Integration6.40 Ratings3.00 Ratings
Data Exploration
Comparison of Data Exploration features of Product A and Product B
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
10.0
Ratings
18% above category average
Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
7.0
Ratings
18% below category average
Visualization10.00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Interactive Data Analysis10.00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Data Preparation
Comparison of Data Preparation features of Product A and Product B
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
9.5
Ratings
15% above category average
Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
4.8
Ratings
52% below category average
Interactive Data Cleaning and Enrichment10.00 Ratings5.10 Ratings
Data Transformations10.00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Data Encryption8.00 Ratings3.00 Ratings
Built-in Processors10.00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Platform Data Modeling
Comparison of Platform Data Modeling features of Product A and Product B
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
9.5
Ratings
13% above category average
Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
6.0
Ratings
33% below category average
Multiple Model Development Languages and Tools10.00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Automated Machine Learning10.00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Single platform for multiple model development10.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Self-Service Model Delivery8.00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Model Deployment
Comparison of Model Deployment features of Product A and Product B
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
8.0
Ratings
6% below category average
Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
6.5
Ratings
27% below category average
Flexible Model Publishing Options9.00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Security, Governance, and Cost Controls7.00 Ratings6.90 Ratings
Best Alternatives
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for DataMicrosoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
Small Businesses
Jupyter Notebook
Jupyter Notebook
Score 9.4 out of 10
Jupyter Notebook
Jupyter Notebook
Score 9.4 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Posit
Posit
Score 10.0 out of 10
Posit
Posit
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Posit
Posit
Score 10.0 out of 10
Posit
Posit
Score 10.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for DataMicrosoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(0 ratings)
6.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.2
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.6
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Availability
8.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
8.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.2
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
8.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
8.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
7.3
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
8.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
7.3
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
8.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for DataMicrosoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
Likelihood to Recommend
It has a lot of features that are good for teams working on large-scale projects and continuously developing and reiterating their data project models. Really helpful when dealing with large data. It is a kind of one-stop solution for all data science tasks like visualization, cleaning, analyzing data, and developing models but small teams might find a lot of features unuseful.
Read full review
Revolution Analytics is a very compelling product for Big Data Analytics. It allows distributed computing over multiple hadoop nodes thus allowing HDFS to do its role cleanly i.e. cheap massive storage and it does good job of running algorithms using R or similar programming language on Hadoop. It would be definitely advantage for the organization who uses either R or SAS as their statistical model development tool as Rev-R support both the platforms. Overall, very positive experience with Rev-R.
Read full review
Pros
  • Integration of IBM Watson APIs such as speech to text, image recognition, personality insights, etc.
  • SPSS modeler and neural network model provide no-code environments for data scientists to build pipelines quickly.
  • Enforced best-practices set up POCs for deployment in production with a minimum of re-work.
  • Estimator validation lets data scientists test and prove different models.
Read full review
  • Parallel processing
  • Integration with R
  • Open-source
Read full review
Cons
  • The cost is steep and so only companies with resources can afford it
  • It will be nice to have Chinese versions so that Chinese engineers can also use it easily
  • It takes a while to learn how to input different kinds of skin defects for detection
Read full review
  • Very high learning curve
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
because we find out that DSX results have improved our approach to the whole subject (data, models, procedures)
Read full review
In general, Revolution Analytics brings a lot of value to the organization. The renewal decision would be based on return on investment in terms of quantified actionable insights that are getting generated against the cost of the product. Additionally, market brand of the tool and reputation risk in terms of possible acquisition and its impact to overall organizational analytic strategy would be considered as well.
Read full review
Usability
The UI flawlessly merges this offering by providing a neat, minimal, responsive interface
Read full review
It is good, easy to use, improvements are being made to the product and more info being shared in the community. It just needs some more time to become more integrated to other platforms and tools/data out there.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
From time to time there are services unavailable, but we have been always informed before and they got back to work sooner than expected
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Performance
Never had slow response even on our very busy network
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
I received answers mostly at once and got answered even further my question: they gave me interesting points of view and suggestion for deepening in the learning path
Read full review
Generally support comes through the forums and user generated channels which are helpful, easy to access, quickly turned around and provided by knowledgeable users. However the support channels are not employees and the channels are often used as a way to learn quick difficult elements of R. Better design, users interface and tutorial options would alleviate the need for this sort of interaction.
Read full review
In-Person Training
The trainers on the job are very smart with solutions and very able in teaching
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Online Training
The Platform is very handy and suggests further steps according my previous interests
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
It surprised us with unpredictable case of use and brand new points of view
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
The main reason I personally changed over from Azure ML Studio is because it lacked any support for significant custom modelling with packages and services such as TensorFlow, scikit-learn, Microsoft Cognitive Toolkit and Spark ML. IBM Watson Studio provides these services and does so in a well integrated and easy to use fashion making it a preferable service over the other services that I have personally used.
Read full review
R is decent for our needs but in the end didn't quite solve all of our needs so moved on. It is a good tool so far. its been a couple months since we last touched it so with changes continuing and more wide spread use and more info being published this tool will improve. Depending upon your needs this can be very easy for you to setup, use, and maintain when compared to other tools out there. My suggestion is to ensure you fully understand your use cases first with data sources identified to ensure this tool can meet your needs.
Read full review
Scalability
It helped us in getting from 0 to DSX without getting lost
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • Could instantly show data driven insights to drive 20% incremental revenue over existing results
  • Still don't have a real use case for unstructured data like twitter feed
  • Some of the insights around user actions have driven new projects to automate mundane tasks
Read full review
  • Better forecasting for resource allocation has saved our organisation hundreds of thousands in conjunction with other strategies.
  • Better visualisation options has allowed smoother internal marketing and internal comms strategies when preparing teams for seasonality.
Read full review
ScreenShots