IBM Watson Speech to Text vs. memoQ

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM Watson Speech to Text
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
IBM Watson Speech to Text supports conversion of audio and voice recordings to text in applications.N/A
memoQ
Score 6.1 out of 10
N/A
memoQ is a translation technology from the company of the same name headquartered in Budapest, boasting an emphasis on quality, innovation and customer satisfaction.N/A
Pricing
IBM Watson Speech to TextmemoQ
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM Watson Speech to TextmemoQ
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM Watson Speech to TextmemoQ
User Ratings
IBM Watson Speech to TextmemoQ
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM Watson Speech to TextmemoQ
Likelihood to Recommend
It's best for real time transcription and when the meeting is between the two speakers. Word recognition is accurate. Also it's available for various platforms, like cloud, apps, on-premise, API support. Price wise it's much better than other competitors. However, there can be still improvement in filtering noise and improving word accuracy. Language support can be increased further
Read full review
MemoQ is especially useful when working in tandem with established translation agencies. The network access is one of the best and allows users to collaborate in projects easily. I would recommend memoQ in that manner, as I have always found it very intuitive and easy to use. All functionalities provided are a must for translators in the industry.
Read full review
Pros
  • Low latency Real time meeting transcription
  • Meeting summary
  • Customer call summary
  • Automatic speech recognition
Read full review
  • Online projects feature
  • Detailed customization such as project templates
  • Various export options such as plain, XLIFF, RTF, etc.
Read full review
Cons
  • More language support
  • Recognize multiple speaker when multiple people are there in meeting
  • AI summary can be improved.
  • can be better in filtering the noise
Read full review
  • Selection of multiple segments is not possible (you can select multiple segments that are following each other by holding down the shift key but not randomly selected segments by holding the Ctrl key or so).
  • Make it easier to use filter configurations of a file already used in a project when adding a new file of the same type.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
It provides more flexible plans as compared to others. These plans are affordable for Small and medium-scale enterprises. They also offer free trial. IBM Watson has wider integration support with the help of API. It has very low latency in real time transcription. Also there is a formatting feature to Transcribe dates, times, currency etc as per the desired format
Read full review
I believe memoQ is the best of these 3 tools. It has soo much functionality. I wish I could use it for all my projects, but we have a lot of clients that want to use either Memsource or SDL Trados Studio. As for the Web Editor, our translators seem to prefer Memsource over memoQ, so this might be something memoQ can improve in the future.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Improving productivity
  • Less communication gap
  • better customer services
  • global collaboration made easy.
Read full review
  • Sales improved.
  • Production rate is growing.
  • Linguists are happy.
Read full review
ScreenShots