IBM Storage Fusion vs. StorPool

Every new user has to get hands-on to start utilizing it Optimal. Once user understands to implementing process and technical configuration, the user will get optimal usage of IBM Fusion. Best part of IBM fusion are, easy to connect with DB(different types), Security features, creation of a data layer(as per requirement) on top of application data

Incentivized

We do recommend StorPool.

• Machine learning model training and execution was at ease
• Performance was good
• Highly scalable

Incentivized

• Simplicity and compatibility - StorPool is intuitive and can be managed with minimal training.
• StorPool also proved to be very scalable and easy to deploy.
• StorPool has a great technical support team - quick and professional. In many cases, they walk the extra mile to advise us on all aspects of our cloud - from hardware selection to soſtware solutions.

• Existing AI models should be able to utilize to other use cases

Incentivized

• Cons - Support for VMware is with iSCSI at this point. This is fine, but we're waiting for the full VMware integration they are working on.

Incentivized

Along with StorPool, we also considered CEPH, LizardFS and some others. However the best price/performance ratio was delivered by StorPool.

• smoothened the process of developing new features in the existing products after migration as one single plane of console does all the job
• Reduced the cost in managing a dedicated storage environment
• On the other side, few licenses like existing backup cann't be used instead we have to rely on IBM offerings

Incentivized

• At this moment we haven’t yet calculated exactly the ROI. Our main focus is to secure the best performance on a reasonable price and that's exactly what we got when we started working with Storpool.