IBM Storage Fusion vs. IBM Storage Scale

Every new user has to get hands-on to start utilizing it Optimal. Once user understands to implementing process and technical configuration, the user will get optimal usage of IBM Fusion. Best part of IBM fusion are, easy to connect with DB(different types), Security features, creation of a data layer(as per requirement) on top of application data

Incentivized

IBM Spectrum Scale creates excellent and real time data results and the capability to extract data and data modeling tools via IBM Spectrum Scale is amazing. The capacity planning and data archiving and the data security offered by IBM Spectrum Scale is more productive and the data quality control using the system is impressive.

• Machine learning model training and execution was at ease
• Performance was good
• Highly scalable

Incentivized

• Good for storage Optimizing.
• Good velocity.
• Strong agility in the product.

Incentivized

• Existing AI models should be able to utilize to other use cases

Incentivized

• Price
• Requires a learning curve and training to manage the product

Incentivized

Incentivized

When we implemented the Spectrum Scale solution, we had in place a NetApp FAS series working in Metro Cluster mode. What is great about NetApp is its low maintenance. On the other hand, it lacks performance, especially on the CPU nodes. We needed a solution that will deliver steady performance while keeping a steady growth.

Incentivized

• smoothened the process of developing new features in the existing products after migration as one single plane of console does all the job
• Reduced the cost in managing a dedicated storage environment
• On the other side, few licenses like existing backup cann't be used instead we have to rely on IBM offerings

Incentivized

• Different versions in a short period of time
• Re-creation of the certificates after an update creates confusion

Incentivized