IBM SevOne vs. PingPlotter
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IBM SevOne | Score8 out of 10 | N/A | IBM SevOne’s app-centric, hybrid network observability empowers NetOps teams with ML-driven insights, enabling proactive issue prevention and resolution. With a single source of truth for network performance, it delivers visibility to optimize operations and support agility in complex, multi-cloud environments. | N/A |
PingPlotter | Score9.3 out of 10 | N/A | PingPlotter is a graphical traceroute and ping tool that visualizes network performance in a way that makes identifying the source of problems quicker and easier for everyone from online gamers and video streamers to VoIP admins and IT pros. Features for remote deployment, network monitoring, scripting, and a web interface are included along with several additional capabilities. | $0 per user |
| IBM SevOne | PingPlotter | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic |
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | IBM® SevOne® uses Managed Device (MD) and Managed Client Device (MCD) as pricing metrics. These can be mapped to managed devices for physical, virtualized and containerized functions in the managed environment. | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| IBM SevOne | PingPlotter | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Would buy again 26 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 95% Delivers good value for the price 20 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Happy with the feature set 26 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 18 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Implementation went as expected 26 Answers | |
| IBM SevOne | PingPlotter | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Network Performance Monitoring |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| IBM SevOne | PingPlotter | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Auvik Score9.9 out of 10 | Auvik Score9.9 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | PingPlotter Score9.3 out of 10 | Intermapper Score8.4 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Nmap Score10 out of 10 | Nmap Score10 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| IBM SevOne | PingPlotter | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.0 | 9.6 |
| Usability | - | 8.4 |
| Support Rating | - | 9.0 |
| IBM SevOne | PingPlotter | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Usability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | IBM SevOne Screenshots | PingPlotter Screenshots |











