IBM Security QRadar EDR vs. Taegis XDR
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IBM Security QRadar EDR | Score7.4 out of 10 | N/A | IBM Security QRadar EDR (formerly ReaQta) combines automation and dashboards to minimize analyst workloads, detect anomalous endpoint behavior and remediate threats in near real time. With visibility across endpoints, it combines expected features, like MITRE ATT&CK mapping and attack visualizations, with dual-engine AI and automation. For teams that need extended support, managed detection and response (MDR) services offers 24/7 monitoring and response to help keep users… | N/A |
Taegis XDR | Score9.9 out of 10 | N/A | Managed security provider Secureworks launched Red Cloak Threat Detection & Response in 2019, to provide SaaS security analytics to help with forensic investigations, and provide another layer of security against threats missed by other endpoint security products. Taegis XDR (formerly Red Cloak TDR) analyzes data from across the enterprise environment, and applies advanced analytics and threat intelligence to alert users to suspicious activity that needs attention. | N/A |
| IBM Security QRadar EDR | Taegis XDR | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | Optional | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| IBM Security QRadar EDR | Taegis XDR | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
100% Would buy again 9 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
83% Delivers good value for the price 5 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
100% Happy with the feature set 9 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
83% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 5 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
100% Implementation went as expected 8 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| IBM Security QRadar EDR | Taegis XDR | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Endpoint Security |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| IBM Security QRadar EDR | Taegis XDR | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud Score9.1 out of 10 | Sophos Intercept X for Server Score7.3 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | Watchguard Endpoint Security Score8.8 out of 10 | ![]() InsightIDR Score9.5 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | ESET PROTECT Score9.1 out of 10 | Kaspersky EDR Optimum Score9.2 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| IBM Security QRadar EDR | Taegis XDR | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.2 | - |
| IBM Security QRadar EDR | Taegis XDR | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
| No answers on this topic |
| Pros |
| No answers on this topic |
| Cons |
| No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered |
| No answers on this topic |
| Return on Investment |
| No answers on this topic |
| ScreenShots | IBM Security QRadar EDR Screenshots |







