IBM Planning Analytics vs. Microsoft SQL Server

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM Planning Analytics
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
IBM Planning Analytics, powered by IBM TM1®, is an integrated planning solution designed to promote collaboration across the organization and help keep pace with the speed of modern business. With its calculation engine, this enterprise performance management solution is designed to help users move beyond the limits of spreadsheets, automating the planning process to drive faster, more accurate results. Use it to unify data sources into one single repository, enabling users to build…
$825
per month 5 users
Microsoft SQL Server
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft SQL Server is a relational database.
$1,418
Per License
Pricing
IBM Planning AnalyticsMicrosoft SQL Server
Editions & Modules
Essentials
$825
per month 5 users
Standard
$1,650
per month 10 users
Subscription
$1,418.00
Per License
Enterprise
$13,748.00
Per License
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM Planning AnalyticsMicrosoft SQL Server
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM Planning AnalyticsMicrosoft SQL Server
Features
IBM Planning AnalyticsMicrosoft SQL Server
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
9.8
Ratings
25% above category average
Microsoft SQL Server
-
Ratings
Pixel Perfect reports9.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Customizable dashboards9.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates9.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
9.7
Ratings
17% above category average
Microsoft SQL Server
-
Ratings
Drill-down analysis9.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Formatting capabilities9.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Integration with R or other statistical packages9.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration9.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
9.5
Ratings
14% above category average
Microsoft SQL Server
-
Ratings
Publish to Web9.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Publish to PDF9.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Report Versioning9.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling8.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
9.3
Ratings
20% above category average
Microsoft SQL Server
-
Ratings
Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)9.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization9.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Predictive Analytics9.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Pattern Recognition and Data Mining7.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Access Control and Security
Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
9.5
Ratings
9% above category average
Microsoft SQL Server
-
Ratings
Multi-User Support (named login)9.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Role-Based Security Model9.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)9.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Report-Level Access Control8.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Single Sign-On (SSO)9.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile Capabilities
Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
7.6
Ratings
3% below category average
Microsoft SQL Server
-
Ratings
Responsive Design for Web Access6.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile Application8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile7.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting
Comparison of Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
9.8
Ratings
17% above category average
Microsoft SQL Server
-
Ratings
Long-term financial planning9.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Financial budgeting9.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Forecasting9.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Scenario modeling9.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Management reporting9.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Consolidation and Close
Comparison of Consolidation and Close features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
9.8
Ratings
21% above category average
Microsoft SQL Server
-
Ratings
Financial data consolidation9.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Journal entries and reports9.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-currency management9.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Intercompany Eliminations9.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Minority Ownership9.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Local and consolidated reporting9.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Detailed Audit Trails9.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Financial Reporting and Compliance
Comparison of Financial Reporting and Compliance features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
9.4
Ratings
15% above category average
Microsoft SQL Server
-
Ratings
Financial Statement Reporting9.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Management Reporting9.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Excel-based Reporting9.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated board and financial reporting9.70 Ratings00 Ratings
XBRL support for regulatory filing8.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Analytics and Reporting
Comparison of Analytics and Reporting features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
9.5
Ratings
17% above category average
Microsoft SQL Server
-
Ratings
Personalized dashboards9.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Color-coded scorecards9.80 Ratings00 Ratings
KPIs9.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Cost and profitability analysis9.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Key Performance Indicator setting9.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Benchmarking with external data8.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Integration
Comparison of Integration features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
9.8
Ratings
16% above category average
Microsoft SQL Server
-
Ratings
Flat file integration9.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Excel data integration9.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Direct links to 3rd-party data sources9.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
IBM Planning AnalyticsMicrosoft SQL Server
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

InterSystems IRIS
InterSystems IRIS
Score 7.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Centage
Centage
Score 9.4 out of 10
InterSystems IRIS
InterSystems IRIS
Score 7.7 out of 10
Enterprises
OneStream
OneStream
Score 8.8 out of 10
SAP IQ
SAP IQ
Score 10.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM Planning AnalyticsMicrosoft SQL Server
Likelihood to Recommend
8.9
(0 ratings)
7.9
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.1
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.7
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.7
(0 ratings)
7.9
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
9.1
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM Planning AnalyticsMicrosoft SQL Server
Likelihood to Recommend
For a CFO or a COO to do budgeting and planning, IBM Planning Analytics would be essential. It is a tool that can take in multiple data sources and showcase them in a multidimensional way. If you are looking just for a BI or reporting tool, Planning Analytics would be considered "overkill".
Read full review
Microsoft SQL Server is ideal for highly available SQL workloads by using SQL Server Always On availability groups. Microsoft SQL Server might not be appropriate for solutions which require a very low resource footprint, since it requires significant CPU cores and RAM memory as well as high IOPS, always depending on the usage scenario.
Read full review
Pros
  • Handle very large data volumes.
  • Scale to a large number of users.
  • Not having to compromise on business complexity.
  • It can be run by business users.
  • Availability of highly qualified consultants to support businesses.
  • REST API allows for an open eco system and a variety of solutions to extend the product.
  • Vast integration possibilities.
  • AI-infused engine with IBM Watson.
Read full review
  • Easy to configure and use with Visual Studio and Dot Net
  • Easy integration with MSBI to perform data analysis
  • Data Security
  • Easy to understand and use
  • Very easy to export database and tables in the form of SQL query or a script
Read full review
Cons
  • sometimes it is hard to produce pixel perfect reports from the Web UI. I know it is not made for this, but still, it'll be great
  • getting in e.g. an Excel file just by drag and drop, and the AI should "understand" what the data is all around
Read full review
  • The import/export process can be tricky to follow with lots of steps and could be better for importing flat files
  • Obtaining help from Microsoft is cumbersome and often other internet sources are better and quicker
  • The documentation is not great and again it's generally better to obtain help elsewhere if needed
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Since IBM Cognos Express is suitable only for medium data warehouse environment, we are not sure if this tool solves the long term need as the business keeps growing rapidly. So its a 50/50 ratio to renew Express license. But having said that, the components of IBM Cognos Express are also available in other Cognos BI suites like Cognos 10.x version. So we will probably upgrade our environment to IBM Cognos 10.x which comes with more new features.
Read full review
I think it is unlikely that sql server has disappointed someone, it is likely that someone will come initially discouraged if the needs and problems that occur are very challenging, but definitely have a SQL oriented system means having a solid base to work and on which maintain the their data securely
Read full review
Usability
IBM Planning Analytics is generally good in terms of functionalities. It can be used reduce time for budget planning, resource planning, demand forecasting, etc. The performance of IBM Planning Analytics is acceptable, but user interface can be improved. It would be good to see new features that allow users to customise the dashboard.
Read full review
SQL Server mostly 'just works' or generates error messages to help you sort out the trouble. You can usually count on the product to get the job done and keep an eye on your potential mistakes. Interaction with other Microsoft products makes operating as a Windows user pretty straight forward. Digging through the multitude of dialogs and wizards can be a pain, but the answer is usually there somewhere.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
No answers on this topic
Its does not have outages.
Read full review
Performance
No answers on this topic
SSAS data cubes may some time slow down your Excel reports.
Read full review
Support Rating
Although I find the IBM Planning analytics documentation quite time consuming, their support with email and call is something i can term as very considerate and patient, I have had few calls about the features and how i would want to implement them within my projects, and the teams have been super helpful to resolve my issues
Read full review
We managed to handle most of our problems by looking into Microsoft's official documentation that has everything explained and almost every function has an example that illustrates in detail how a particular functionality works. Just like PowerShell has the ability to show you an example of how some cmdlet works, that is the case also here, and in my opinion, it is a very good practice and I like it.
Read full review
In-Person Training
No answers on this topic
It was good
Read full review
Online Training
No answers on this topic
very hands on and detailed training
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
Other than SQL taking quite a bit of time to actually install there are no problems with installation. Even on hardware that has good performance SQL can still take close to an hour to install a typical server with management and reporting services.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
For strong technical teams and flexibility IBM Planning Analytics is the way to go. For quicker adoption and less technical teams Anaplan is the best option. If consolidation, financials, and moving from legacy tools are main focus than OneStream will be a really good choice. If deeply invested into SAP already than the SAP BPC will be the best fit to maintain the investment.
Read full review
Microsoft SQL is slower than MySQL and Access but far more feature-rich and reliable. Access is almost obsolete nowadays, so not too many people are considering it, but unless budget or an open-source ethos is a factor, Microsoft SQL is superior in every way. Many commonly used tools, like Crystal Reports, support it.
Read full review
Scalability
No answers on this topic
SQL server does handle growing demands of a mid sized company.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Much higher degree of accuracy in forecasting with the use of predictive analysis from historical data
  • Dozens of man hours saved in routine processes that are now handled with minimal human interaction
  • One system that holds the "source of truth," consolidating multiple systems together that were only accessible individually before
Read full review
  • Increased accuracy - We went from multiple users having different versions of an Excel spreadsheet to a single source of truth for our reporting.
  • Increased Efficiency - We can now generate reports at any time from a single source rather than multiple users spending their time collating data and generating reports.
  • Improved Security - Enterprise level security on a dedicated server rather than financial files on multiple laptop hard drives.
Read full review
ScreenShots

IBM Planning Analytics Screenshots

Screenshot of Workflow managementScreenshot of Income statementScreenshot of Margin analysisScreenshot of Metrics managementScreenshot of Income statementScreenshot of Expense analysis