TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    IBM Planning Analytics

    Score8.8 out of 10
    N/AIBM Planning Analytics, powered by IBM TM1®, is an integrated planning solution designed to promote collaboration across the organization and help keep pace with the speed of modern business. With its calculation engine, this enterprise performance management solution is designed to help users move beyond the limits of spreadsheets, automating the planning process to drive faster, more accurate results. Use it to unify data sources into one single repository, enabling users to build…

    $825

    per month 5 users

    Microsoft SQL Server

    Score8.8 out of 10
    N/AMicrosoft SQL Server is a relational database.

    $1,418

    Per License

    Pricing
    IBM Planning AnalyticsMicrosoft SQL Server
    Editions & Modules
    Essentials
    $825
    per month 5 users
    Standard
    $1,650
    per month 10 users
    Subscription
    $1,418.00
    Per License
    Enterprise
    $13,748.00
    Per License
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    IBM Planning AnalyticsMicrosoft SQL Server
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    YesNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    IBM Planning AnalyticsMicrosoft SQL Server
    Considered Both Products
    IBM
    Chose IBM Planning Analytics
    IBM PA is like having pivot tables on steroids. Possibilities are endless.
    Incentivized
    Chose IBM Planning Analytics
    IBM Planning Analytics is easier to use and setup for me. Easier to make reports. Works fast
    Incentivized
    Chose IBM Planning Analytics
    Anaplan license costs were higher than in IBM Planning Analytics.
    Incentivized
    Microsoft
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    99%
    Would buy again
    95 Answers
    100%
    Would buy again
    52 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    98%
    Delivers good value for the price
    86 Answers
    96%
    Delivers good value for the price
    44 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    97%
    Happy with the feature set
    93 Answers
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    52 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    97%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    70 Answers
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    38 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    93%
    Implementation went as expected
    80 Answers
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    44 Answers
    Features
    IBM Planning AnalyticsMicrosoft SQL Server
    BI Standard Reporting
    Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of IBM Planning Analytics and Microsoft SQL Server
    Feature
    IBM Planning Analytics
    9.7
    90 Ratings
    24% above category average
    Microsoft SQL Server
    -
    Ratings
    Pixel Perfect reports9.879 Ratings00 Ratings
    Customizable dashboards9.790 Ratings00 Ratings
    Report Formatting Templates9.784 Ratings00 Ratings
    Ad-hoc Reporting
    Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of IBM Planning Analytics and Microsoft SQL Server
    Feature
    IBM Planning Analytics
    9.7
    96 Ratings
    17% above category average
    Microsoft SQL Server
    -
    Ratings
    Drill-down analysis9.893 Ratings00 Ratings
    Formatting capabilities9.795 Ratings00 Ratings
    Integration with R or other statistical packages9.871 Ratings00 Ratings
    Report sharing and collaboration9.792 Ratings00 Ratings
    Report Output and Scheduling
    Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of IBM Planning Analytics and Microsoft SQL Server
    Feature
    IBM Planning Analytics
    9.5
    90 Ratings
    14% above category average
    Microsoft SQL Server
    -
    Ratings
    Publish to Web9.985 Ratings00 Ratings
    Publish to PDF9.984 Ratings00 Ratings
    Report Versioning9.983 Ratings00 Ratings
    Report Delivery Scheduling8.475 Ratings00 Ratings
    Data Discovery and Visualization
    Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of IBM Planning Analytics and Microsoft SQL Server
    Feature
    IBM Planning Analytics
    9.3
    92 Ratings
    20% above category average
    Microsoft SQL Server
    -
    Ratings
    Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)9.892 Ratings00 Ratings
    Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization9.886 Ratings00 Ratings
    Predictive Analytics9.882 Ratings00 Ratings
    Pattern Recognition and Data Mining7.815 Ratings00 Ratings
    Access Control and Security
    Comparison of Access Control and Security features of IBM Planning Analytics and Microsoft SQL Server
    Feature
    IBM Planning Analytics
    9.5
    96 Ratings
    9% above category average
    Microsoft SQL Server
    -
    Ratings
    Multi-User Support (named login)9.894 Ratings00 Ratings
    Role-Based Security Model9.895 Ratings00 Ratings
    Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)9.896 Ratings00 Ratings
    Report-Level Access Control8.420 Ratings00 Ratings
    Single Sign-On (SSO)9.888 Ratings00 Ratings
    Mobile Capabilities
    Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of IBM Planning Analytics and Microsoft SQL Server
    Feature
    IBM Planning Analytics
    7.6
    83 Ratings
    3% below category average
    Microsoft SQL Server
    -
    Ratings
    Responsive Design for Web Access6.182 Ratings00 Ratings
    Mobile Application8.046 Ratings00 Ratings
    Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile7.855 Ratings00 Ratings
    Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting
    Comparison of Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting features of IBM Planning Analytics and Microsoft SQL Server
    Feature
    IBM Planning Analytics
    9.8
    102 Ratings
    17% above category average
    Microsoft SQL Server
    -
    Ratings
    Long-term financial planning9.898 Ratings00 Ratings
    Financial budgeting9.8101 Ratings00 Ratings
    Forecasting9.8102 Ratings00 Ratings
    Scenario modeling9.7101 Ratings00 Ratings
    Management reporting9.7101 Ratings00 Ratings
    Consolidation and Close
    Comparison of Consolidation and Close features of IBM Planning Analytics and Microsoft SQL Server
    Feature
    IBM Planning Analytics
    9.8
    95 Ratings
    21% above category average
    Microsoft SQL Server
    -
    Ratings
    Financial data consolidation9.791 Ratings00 Ratings
    Journal entries and reports9.883 Ratings00 Ratings
    Multi-currency management9.884 Ratings00 Ratings
    Intercompany Eliminations9.883 Ratings00 Ratings
    Minority Ownership9.875 Ratings00 Ratings
    Local and consolidated reporting9.887 Ratings00 Ratings
    Detailed Audit Trails9.789 Ratings00 Ratings
    Financial Reporting and Compliance
    Comparison of Financial Reporting and Compliance features of IBM Planning Analytics and Microsoft SQL Server
    Feature
    IBM Planning Analytics
    9.4
    96 Ratings
    15% above category average
    Microsoft SQL Server
    -
    Ratings
    Financial Statement Reporting9.892 Ratings00 Ratings
    Management Reporting9.893 Ratings00 Ratings
    Excel-based Reporting9.895 Ratings00 Ratings
    Automated board and financial reporting9.785 Ratings00 Ratings
    XBRL support for regulatory filing8.161 Ratings00 Ratings
    Analytics and Reporting
    Comparison of Analytics and Reporting features of IBM Planning Analytics and Microsoft SQL Server
    Feature
    IBM Planning Analytics
    9.5
    98 Ratings
    18% above category average
    Microsoft SQL Server
    -
    Ratings
    Personalized dashboards9.797 Ratings00 Ratings
    Color-coded scorecards9.892 Ratings00 Ratings
    KPIs9.895 Ratings00 Ratings
    Cost and profitability analysis9.893 Ratings00 Ratings
    Key Performance Indicator setting9.894 Ratings00 Ratings
    Benchmarking with external data8.165 Ratings00 Ratings
    Integration
    Comparison of Integration features of IBM Planning Analytics and Microsoft SQL Server
    Feature
    IBM Planning Analytics
    9.8
    97 Ratings
    16% above category average
    Microsoft SQL Server
    -
    Ratings
    Flat file integration9.894 Ratings00 Ratings
    Excel data integration9.895 Ratings00 Ratings
    Direct links to 3rd-party data sources9.886 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    IBM Planning AnalyticsMicrosoft SQL Server
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    SingleStore
    Score7.5 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Centage
    Score9.4 out of 10
    SAP HANA Cloud
    Score8.9 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
    Score10 out of 10
    SAP IQ
    Score10 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    IBM Planning AnalyticsMicrosoft SQL Server
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.9
    (108 ratings)
    7.9
    (99 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    9.1
    (5 ratings)
    9.0
    (6 ratings)
    Usability
    9.7
    (73 ratings)
    7.2
    (13 ratings)
    Availability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Performance
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    9.7
    (97 ratings)
    7.9
    (25 ratings)
    In-Person Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Online Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (5 ratings)
    Configurability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Data Sharing and Collaboration
    9.0
    (3 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Data Sources
    9.0
    (3 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    IBM Planning AnalyticsMicrosoft SQL Server
    Likelihood to Recommend
    IBM
    Very powerful modeling capabilities. It has a really good OLAP engine memory. Strong scenario planning for what if analysis. Flexibility of integration with ERPs or WM systems for both cloud and on premises. Centralized planning and alignment of governance is also a plus. Having one single system for many different functions.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    Microsoft SQL is ubiquitous, while MySQL runs under the hood all over the place. Microsoft SQL is the platform taught in colleges and certification courses and is the one most likely to be used by businesses because it is backed by Microsoft. Its interface is friendly (well, as pleasant as SQL can be) and has been used by so many for so long that resources are freely available if you encounter any issues.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    IBM
    • Handle very large data volumes.
    • Scale to a large number of users.
    • Not having to compromise on business complexity.
    • It can be run by business users.
    • Availability of highly qualified consultants to support businesses.
    • REST API allows for an open eco system and a variety of solutions to extend the product.
    • Vast integration possibilities.
    • AI-infused engine with IBM Watson.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • Easy to configure and use with Visual Studio and Dot Net
    • Easy integration with MSBI to perform data analysis
    • Data Security
    • Easy to understand and use
    • Very easy to export database and tables in the form of SQL query or a script
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    IBM
    • sometimes it is hard to produce pixel perfect reports from the Web UI. I know it is not made for this, but still, it'll be great
    • getting in e.g. an Excel file just by drag and drop, and the AI should "understand" what the data is all around
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • Microsoft SQL Server Enterprise edition has a high cost but is the only edition which supports SQL Always On Availability Groups. It would be nice to include this feature in the Standard version.
    • Licensing of Microsoft SQL Server is a quite complex matter, it would be good to simplify licensing in the future. For example, per core vs per user CAL licensing, as well as complex licensing scenarios in the Cloud and on Edge locations.
    • It would be good to include native tools for converting Oracle, DB2, Postgresql and MySQL/MariaDB databases (schema and data) for import into Microsoft SQL Server.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    IBM
    Since IBM Cognos Express is suitable only for medium data warehouse environment, we are not sure if this tool solves the long term need as the business keeps growing rapidly. So its a 50/50 ratio to renew Express license. But having said that, the components of IBM Cognos Express are also available in other Cognos BI suites like Cognos 10.x version. So we will probably upgrade our environment to IBM Cognos 10.x which comes with more new features.
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    We understand that the Microsoft SQL Server will continue to advance, offering the same robust and reliable platform while adding new features that enable us, as a software center, to create a superior product. That provides excellent performance while reducing the hardware requirements and the total cost of ownership of our solution.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    IBM
    IBM Planning Analytics is generally good in terms of functionalities. It can be used reduce time for budget planning, resource planning, demand forecasting, etc. The performance of IBM Planning Analytics is acceptable, but user interface can be improved. It would be good to see new features that allow users to customise the dashboard.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    SQL Server mostly 'just works' or generates error messages to help you sort out the trouble. You can usually count on the product to get the job done and keep an eye on your potential mistakes. Interaction with other Microsoft products makes operating as a Windows user pretty straight forward. Digging through the multitude of dialogs and wizards can be a pain, but the answer is usually there somewhere.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    Microsoft
    Its does not have outages.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Performance
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    Microsoft
    SSAS data cubes may some time slow down your Excel reports.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    IBM
    IBM support has been very quick to respond and handle the very few issues we've had. We've had a third-party who partners with IBM to be our consulting team which has helped greatly reduce the need for us to contact IBM directly. I highly recommend researching and selecting a well-respected partner to help with an implementation as well as ongoing support as needed.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    We managed to handle most of our problems by looking into Microsoft's official documentation that has everything explained and almost every function has an example that illustrates in detail how a particular functionality works. Just like PowerShell has the ability to show you an example of how some cmdlet works, that is the case also here, and in my opinion, it is a very good practice and I like it.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    In-Person Training
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    Microsoft
    It was good
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Online Training
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    Microsoft
    very hands on and detailed training
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    Microsoft
    Other than SQL taking quite a bit of time to actually install there are no problems with installation. Even on hardware that has good performance SQL can still take close to an hour to install a typical server with management and reporting services.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    IBM
    As it is related to MS Excel, IBM Planning Analytics is a much more robust and complete solution for the CFO or COO in mind. Oracle Hyperion stacks up nicely against IBM Planning Analytics. However, IBM's investment in AI allows Planning Analytics users more options and speed.
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    [Microsoft] SQL Server has a much better community and professional support and is overall just a more reliable system with Microsoft behind it. I've used MySQL in the past and SQL Server has just become more comfortable for me and is my go to RDBMS.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Scalability
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    Microsoft
    SQL server does handle growing demands of a mid sized company.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    IBM
    • Automate direct data connections to multiple data sources
    • One secured version of the the truth (for data and formulas)
    • Ability to scale to much more detailed planning with option to create predictive forecasts at detail
    • Business user friendly with powerful Excel integration
    • Very flexible and powerful modeling, can handle custom modeling needs at scale
    • Can make the same data available across finance and ops, but at the level of details and timeline that makes sense for them
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • Increased accuracy - We went from multiple users having different versions of an Excel spreadsheet to a single source of truth for our reporting.
    • Increased Efficiency - We can now generate reports at any time from a single source rather than multiple users spending their time collating data and generating reports.
    • Improved Security - Enterprise level security on a dedicated server rather than financial files on multiple laptop hard drives.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    IBM Planning Analytics Screenshots

    Screenshot of Workflow managementScreenshot of Income statementScreenshot of Margin analysisScreenshot of Metrics managementScreenshot of Income statementScreenshot of Expense analysis