IBM InfoSphere QualityStage vs. ZoomInfo Operations

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM InfoSphere QualityStage
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
IBM InfoSphere QualityStage is a data quality offering from IBM.N/A
ZoomInfo Operations
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
ZoomInfo OperationsOS/RingLead is a comprehensive data quality management platform for sales and marketing operations teams to clean, enrich, and route their go-to-market data.N/A
Pricing
IBM InfoSphere QualityStageZoomInfo Operations
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM InfoSphere QualityStageZoomInfo Operations
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeRequired
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM InfoSphere QualityStageZoomInfo Operations
Features
IBM InfoSphere QualityStageZoomInfo Operations
Data Quality
Comparison of Data Quality features of Product A and Product B
IBM InfoSphere QualityStage
9.0
Ratings
3% above category average
ZoomInfo Operations
8.2
Ratings
6% below category average
Data source connectivity9.00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Data profiling9.00 Ratings8.80 Ratings
Master data management (MDM) integration9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Data element standardization9.00 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Match and merge9.00 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Address verification9.00 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Best Alternatives
IBM InfoSphere QualityStageZoomInfo Operations
Small Businesses
HubSpot Data Hub
HubSpot Data Hub
Score 7.7 out of 10
HubSpot Data Hub
HubSpot Data Hub
Score 7.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
Score 8.0 out of 10
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
Score 8.0 out of 10
Enterprises
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
Score 8.0 out of 10
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
Score 8.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM InfoSphere QualityStageZoomInfo Operations
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.5
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM InfoSphere QualityStageZoomInfo Operations
Likelihood to Recommend
Good for issues with data quality, and instances where you need to add controls and rules to load the data. Also if you have a large amount of data.
Read full review
The contact enrichment feature adds missing contact info, like emails or phone numbers. It also allows us to confirm that the address information on our CRM matches what Zoom says. I wish more emails were available within the service, but what you can glean from Zoom makes marketing to the correct personas much easier.
Read full review
Pros
  • Create rules
  • Standardization and normalization of data
  • Integration with DataStage
Read full review
  • EverString allows us to build account lists based off in-depth firmographic or technographic data. It's far more accurate than trying to build these lists any other way.
  • EverString is fast. Where it might've previously taken us weeks to build lists of this quality, we now can build them in a matter of minutes (and have them ready to be published in a couple of hours).
Read full review
Cons
  • Should include all the data profiling functionality
  • Better features to tune matching capability
  • Include AI to automatically recommend actions to improve processes
Read full review
  • Contacts underneath Companies can be outdated by 4+ years (left employer years prior).
  • Customer support is not as engaged as a smaller software company might be. Delays in solving issues.
  • Limits in sharing lists, queries, and tags between users under the same account.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
Would love to keep everstring as part of our tech stack in the future. if we ever have to move from everstring it will be due to budget not the solution itself.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
Usability is among the highest I have ever worked within an application of this magnitude. It was a significant recession for us and our sales team along with some of our onboarding folks have been able to use the tool as well. Other are able to benefit as well that are outside of the sales team but I do get as much of their feedback as I do from the sales team.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
No answers on this topic
No problems
Read full review
Performance
No answers on this topic
Had very good experience when using it
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
Quick response and quick resolution.
Read full review
Online Training
No answers on this topic
It was helpful
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
Have a plan on how you're going to evaluate. We had a two-month trial period, but a six-month average lead cycle time, making it impossible to evaluate on a purely new-business ROI basis within the trial. We applied the model to our prior data, which demonstrated how much time and effort was devoted to accounts that weren't going to close
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
QualityStage is positioned as a world leader as a data cleaning tool, and competes face to face with PowerCenter. Particularly in Latin America we consider that QualityStage is better customized in terms of data cleaning rules for the region.
Read full review
I haven't tried stacking it against any competition as I feel no need to. ZoomInfo blows me away like it first did in 2018, and I don't want something different. I hear Clay is good, but I just haven't felt the need to try it out or replace ZoomInfo at all.
Read full review
Scalability
No answers on this topic
Hasn’t experienced any issues to doubt reliability
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Improving Data Quality
  • Reducing costs due to better Data Quality
  • Single view of customer / product
  • Better data governance
Read full review
  • The rate we close prospects run through Zoom products is up 10% on average
  • The time to close a prospect has been reduced by one calendar week (about 5%)
  • The time spent reviewing prospects has shrunk from 1-2 hours a week to 5-10 minutes which is HUGE.
Read full review
ScreenShots