IBM Cloud Pak for Applications vs. Mapme

IBM Cloud Pak for Applications

10 Reviews and Ratings

Mapme

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
IBM Cloud Pak for Applications	Score7.2 out of 10	N/A	IBM Cloud Pak® for Applications (CP4Apps) is an end-to-end hybrid cloud application platform, providing flexibility for deployments, building new cloud-native applications, refactoring and re-platforming existing applications. Designed to leverage a collection of application runtimes, modernization tools and a Kubernetes container platform to adapt to their landscape needs.	N/A
Mapme	N/A	N/A	Mapme enables companies and organizations to leverage maps in order to share their stories, generate more transactions, and improve their customers’ experience. With Mapme, the user can create interactive maps with no coding. Its advanced customization features make it easy to achieve the desired look and feel, for any map.	$39 per month

Pricing

IBM Cloud Pak for Applications

Mapme

No answers on this topic

Story: $39
per month
Pro: $75
per month
Pro+: $150
per month
Enterprise: Custom

Pricing Offerings
IBM Cloud Pak for Applications	Mapme
Free Trial
No	No
Free/Freemium Version
No	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

No setup fee

No setup fee

—

—

User Ratings
	IBM Cloud Pak for Applications	Mapme
Likelihood to Recommend	7.2 (3 ratings)	- (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	IBM Cloud Pak for Applications	Mapme
Likelihood to Recommend	IBM Well suited for customers who are looking for cloud-adoption, and finally to meet the challenges of business innovation for the competitive advantage through DevOps. Incentivized Verified User Read full review	Mapme No answers on this topic
Pros	IBM Provides a fantastic range of Application runtimes allowing the most suitable runtime to be selected for the app being implemented. After using Transformation Advisor for quite a while, it is an indispensable tool to help modernize, specifically from WebSphere and Tomcat, towards the lightweight, fast and efficient Liberty runtime. The simplicity of the licensing by wrapping many products into a single offering with a different VPC weighting. Allows us to modernize our runtime from WebSphere Application Server (or ND) to WebSphere Liberty core without sacrificing our WAS licenses. Incentivized Verified User Read full review	Mapme No answers on this topic
Cons	IBM User Experience and Learning Curve Integration with Third-party Tools Pricing and Licensing Model Incentivized Nelson Lopez CEO (Chief Executive Officer) Read full review	Mapme No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered	IBM Our customer mission-critical core banking applications like Temenos T24 run on best of the breed IBM WebSphere Application Server which is java based-application server. IBM has kept up the promise of providing support, fixpack, and any update. As far as I know, at least by 2030, IBM is committed to continue with WHE which gives customers confidence in their current investments. Incentivized Verified User Read full review	Mapme No answers on this topic
Return on Investment	IBM We have been able to migrate apps away from the expensive WAS-ND to the more cost-effective WAS-base without throwing away our WAS-ND licenses. With a 1:4 ratio of WAS-ND to WAS-base we've been able to we've been able to save in excess of 75% on licensing charges for these apps. By having a license model based on VPC ratios (1:4:8 - WAS-ND:WAS-base:Liberty core) we've been able to move away from using license pooling resulting in over-allocating (i.e. wasting) CPU cores for each license pool, to using consolidated license pools hosting a combination of WAS-ND, WAS-base and Liberty-core. This has allowed us to reduce our licensing costs accordingly. Incentivized Verified User Read full review	Mapme No answers on this topic
ScreenShots