IBM Cloud Functions vs. Waylay Digital Twin

IBM Cloud Functions

57 Reviews and Ratings

Waylay Digital Twin

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
IBM Cloud Functions	Score8 out of 10	N/A	IBM Cloud Functions is a PaaS platform based on Apache OpenWhisk. With it, developers write code (“actions”) that respond to external events. Actions are hosted, executed, and scaled on demand based on the number of events coming in. No servers or infrastructure to provision and manage.	$0 per second of execution
Waylay Digital Twin	N/A	N/A	Waylay Digital Twin is a no-code Salesforce solution that connects IoT to Salesforce and boosts the visibility of data, health and performance metrics for connected assets. Salesforce users configure asset monitoring based on the business context, create new condition-based predictive maintenance use cases, optimize remote operations and leverage asset data for consumption-based business models. Waylay Digital Twin is available on Salesforce.	N/A

Pricing

IBM Cloud Functions

Waylay Digital Twin

Basic Cloud Functions Rate: $0.00017
per second of execution
API Gateway Rate: Free

No answers on this topic

Pricing Offerings
IBM Cloud Functions	Waylay Digital Twin
Free Trial
No	Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

No setup fee

No setup fee

—

—

Best Alternatives
	IBM Cloud Functions	Waylay Digital Twin
Small Businesses	AWS Lambda Score8.6 out of 10	IBM Cloud Foundry Score6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	AWS Lambda Score8.6 out of 10	IBM Cloud Private Score9.6 out of 10
Enterprises	AWS Lambda Score8.6 out of 10	AWS Elastic Beanstalk Score7.3 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	IBM Cloud Functions	Waylay Digital Twin
Likelihood to Recommend	3.0 (7 ratings)	- (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	IBM Cloud Functions	Waylay Digital Twin
Likelihood to Recommend	IBM IBM Cloud Functions [is] not the worse product on the IBM cloud. I decided to write this review as I thought it would be balanced. I would still use functions to set up a serverless architecture where execution time is pretty quick and the code is relatively simple. I wouldn't use IBM Cloud Functions for async calls obviously, as costs could be higher. The functions documentation is lacking in terms of CI/CD, and there are unexplainable errors occurring - like the network connection that I mentioned. So I wouldn't just rely on IBM Cloud Functions too much for the entire system, but make sure it's diversified. Verified User Read full review	Waylay No answers on this topic
Pros	IBM Great substitute for a simple API calls to run non-complicated code. Easy way to run Python/Java/Javascript to get something done. File validation. Incentivized Verified User Read full review	Waylay No answers on this topic
Cons	IBM Billing can be a hassle, not the most responsive customer service/support team Handles & executes most functionalities, but other platforms offer more scalability if you're seeking consistent and stable growth Incentivized Verified User Read full review	Waylay No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered	IBM ICF is a lightweight service and does not require runtime configurations Scalable on demand and hence there is no need to pay for runtime costs Incentivized Badheka, Amit Technology Architect Read full review	Waylay No answers on this topic
Return on Investment	IBM It directly affected our expenses since we do not need to deploy and maintain a set of separate applications. It allowed us to pay for only the amount of time cloud functions run. It saved on maintenance and monitoring of the applications it replaced. Incentivized Verified User Read full review	Waylay No answers on this topic
ScreenShots		Waylay Digital Twin Screenshots