Alfresco vs. Redwood Reporting : Report2Web

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Alfresco
Score 9.9 out of 10
N/A
The Alfresco platform, from Hyland, delivers comprehensive cloud-native content services. It is used to intelligently activate processes and content to accelerate the flow of business.N/A
Redwood Reporting : Report2Web
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Redwood Reporting automatically delivers critical report output, when, where and how it is needed most. This is to eliminate the frustration, wasted time, and errors associated with manually accessing, calculating and mapping pieces of information from disparate systems and data sources. Redwood Reporting provides: Browser-based access to reports from virtually any application Push and pull options so that users have instant access to new and historical report…N/A
Pricing
AlfrescoRedwood Reporting : Report2Web
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AlfrescoRedwood Reporting : Report2Web
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsContact Redwood Software for pricing details.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
AlfrescoRedwood Reporting : Report2Web
Features
AlfrescoRedwood Reporting : Report2Web
Enterprise Content Management
Comparison of Enterprise Content Management features of Product A and Product B
Alfresco
8.0
Ratings
0% above category average
Redwood Reporting : Report2Web
9.1
Ratings
13% above category average
Content capture & imaging3.10 Ratings00 Ratings
File sync, storage & archiving9.00 Ratings9.10 Ratings
Document management10.00 Ratings9.10 Ratings
Records management8.00 Ratings9.10 Ratings
Content search & retrieval10.00 Ratings9.10 Ratings
Enterprise content collaboration8.00 Ratings9.10 Ratings
Content publishing & creation8.00 Ratings9.10 Ratings
Security, risk management & information governance9.00 Ratings9.10 Ratings
Contract lifecycle management8.90 Ratings9.10 Ratings
Automated workflows9.00 Ratings9.10 Ratings
Artificial intelligence8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile support3.00 Ratings9.10 Ratings
Integration10.00 Ratings9.10 Ratings
User Ratings
AlfrescoRedwood Reporting : Report2Web
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.9
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
AlfrescoRedwood Reporting : Report2Web
Likelihood to Recommend
If you have regulatory or business needs that require saving email into Alfresco and you are using Outlook for Mac, you may need to perform significant customization to make it work. Additionally, if you will have users that will be members to a large numbers of sites over time, you need to thoroughly explore what functionality will be degraded or lost and how to mitigate the impact. Other than these two scenarios, I cannot think of any scenarios where Alfresco would not be well suited to an organization's needs.
Read full review
The tool is very powerful for obtaining and scheduling reports; however, I believe that if the cost were lower, more companies could obtain it
Read full review
Pros
  • Integration with other applications, namely Drupal and Moodle, was simple and works beautifully.
  • The UI is intuitive, clean, and friendly. Users have required little training for basic functionality.
  • We have been pleased with the overall system performance of Alfresco Enterprise Content Management.
Read full review
  • [It] has [a] default report.
  • [It] has a section where you can create reports by making queries in SQL.
  • It has a Dashboard window where you can schedule reports in real time of the executions of the jobs or chains.
Read full review
Cons
  • Alfresco Process Services and Alfresco Application Development Framework integration makes for best functionality/application of ECM.
  • Use case alignment - Marketing content and documentation of specific business requirements and user stories being available as reference material/documentation.
  • Integration with multiple silos for content.
Read full review
  • It has a positive impact for the different managements since they can obtain their reports on a daily basis and in case any job fails on a recurring basis they can make decisions.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
As per the current market and the line of products that are available for content and document management system, Alfresco is a very good option compared to other systems in terms of features and cost. Plus the community support is great. Also since the product is open source, it can be extended or understood in a better way.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
The UI is very intuitive, most of our users figure out how to use the platform by themselves, so there's not much training needed.
You can upload files by using the web drag and drop, WebDAV, FTP, and more.
Most of the platform already works as-is so you can just deploy it using Docker and it's mostly ready to go.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
I am not big fan of Alfresco Content Services' support; it works on its own speed and sometimes it becomes challenging to achieve business needs. However, I appreciate regular delivery of security patches and updates
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Process was relatively smooth and overall, downtime minimal. MSI was very responsive to our needs and made the transition easier than it otherwise might have been.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
The integration is very easy and can be done with minimal time. The features like sending email, inbuilt integration with CAMEl, MULE, BOX, etc. In addition to this, the adoption of activiti-7 (the microservice version) wins the race against other tools. As the infrastructure and application modules can be deployed independently.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • It definitely has a positive ROI in the overall business, as content management has become easier and more centralized.
  • Video and image content management has become a major plus, as they play an important role in dynamic digital marketing. Once the code is written to accommodate image and videos, we can change this content any time depending on the season of the year, what products we are looking to market, and to what type of clients.
  • It helps with easy control of the system with the business teams rather than having control with the technology teams. Hence it makes it easy to customize and make changes at any time. This also reduces the overlap that technology has with business and helps treat both of them as separate entities.
Read full review
  • The Redwood system by itself is a very good tool that can pay off the investment in a very short time.
  • It has a positive impact for the different managements since they can obtain their reports on a daily basis and in case any job fails on a recurring basis they can make decisions.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Alfresco Screenshots

Screenshot of Alfresco Control CenterScreenshot of Alfresco

Redwood Reporting : Report2Web Screenshots

Screenshot of Report2Web PageMart Viewer with Content Driven FiltersScreenshot of Report2Web PageMart User FavoritesScreenshot of Customizable Report2Web Email TemplatesScreenshot of Report2Web Keyword Index and SearchScreenshot of Report2Web Authentication Options