HxGN EAM (formerly Infor EAM) is a configurable enterprise asset management platform. The solution was acquired by Hexagon from Infor in late 2021.
N/A
IFS Applications
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
IFS Applications is presented by the vendor as an agile application suite that offers enterprise resource planning (ERP), enterprise asset management (EAM) and enterprise project management, handling 4 core processes: Service & Asset Management Full Enterprise Asset Management (EAM), Maintenance Repair and Overhaul (MRO) and Field Service Management (FSM) Manufacturing Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) with support for process manufacturing, discrete manufacturing…
N/A
Pricing
HxGN EAM
IFS Applications
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
HxGN EAM
IFS Applications
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
HxGN EAM
IFS Applications
Features
HxGN EAM
IFS Applications
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
HxGN EAM
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
2.6
Ratings
94% below category average
Pay calculation
00 Ratings
4.00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
00 Ratings
4.00 Ratings
Direct deposit files
00 Ratings
3.00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
HxGN EAM
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
8.5
Ratings
11% above category average
API for custom integration
00 Ratings
8.50 Ratings
Plug-ins
00 Ratings
8.50 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
HxGN EAM
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
9.7
Ratings
17% above category average
Single sign-on capability
00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
00 Ratings
9.50 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
HxGN EAM
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
7.8
Ratings
8% above category average
Dashboards
00 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Standard reports
00 Ratings
7.50 Ratings
Custom reports
00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
HxGN EAM
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
7.4
Ratings
4% below category average
Accounts payable
00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Accounts receivable
00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Global Financial Support
00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
00 Ratings
8.50 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
00 Ratings
8.50 Ratings
Standardized Processes
00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
HxGN EAM
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
8.6
Ratings
8% above category average
Inventory tracking
00 Ratings
8.50 Ratings
Automatic reordering
00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Location management
00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
HxGN EAM
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
5.4
Ratings
37% below category average
Pricing
00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Order entry
00 Ratings
8.50 Ratings
Credit card processing
00 Ratings
6.00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold
00 Ratings
6.50 Ratings
Order Orchestration
00 Ratings
6.50 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
HxGN EAM
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
3.4
Ratings
75% below category average
Billing Management
00 Ratings
6.50 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management
00 Ratings
7.50 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management
00 Ratings
7.50 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting
00 Ratings
6.50 Ratings
Period Close
00 Ratings
8.50 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Product A and Product B
HxGN EAM
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
2.7
Ratings
95% below category average
Budgeting and Forecasting
00 Ratings
3.00 Ratings
Project Costing
00 Ratings
6.00 Ratings
Cost Capture
00 Ratings
5.00 Ratings
Capital Project Management
00 Ratings
2.00 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance
00 Ratings
2.00 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition
00 Ratings
2.00 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
HxGN EAM
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
3.6
Ratings
63% below category average
Project Planning and Scheduling
00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers
00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality
00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools
00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Product A and Product B
HxGN EAM
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
10.0
Ratings
30% above category average
Award Lifecycle Management
00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
HxGN EAM
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
3.3
Ratings
71% below category average
Bids Analyzed and Compared
00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Contract Authoring
00 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Contract Repository
00 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated
00 Ratings
9.50 Ratings
Supplier Management
00 Ratings
9.50 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Product A and Product B
HxGN EAM
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
4.6
Ratings
35% below category average
Risk Repository
00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Control Management
00 Ratings
8.50 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments
00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Issue Detection
00 Ratings
6.00 Ratings
Remediation and Certification
00 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Product A and Product B
HxGN EAM
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
6.3
Ratings
6% below category average
Transportation Planning and Optimization
00 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management
00 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management
00 Ratings
6.00 Ratings
Fulfillment Management
00 Ratings
5.00 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management
00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
HxGN EAM
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
6.2
Ratings
18% below category average
Production Process Design
00 Ratings
8.50 Ratings
Production Management
00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Configuration Management
00 Ratings
7.50 Ratings
Work Execution
00 Ratings
8.50 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs
00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
HxGN EAM
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
8.5
Ratings
18% above category average
Forecasting
00 Ratings
7.50 Ratings
Inventory Planning
00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Performance Monitoring
00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Product A and Product B
HxGN EAM is probably better suited for larger enterprise solutions where there is a need for enterprise asset management. At our organization, we had a long asset list but also at multiple sites and building locations. With many sites, we found it difficult to sometimes track the assets. The HxGN EAM product allowed for a consolidated view as well as good on-time reporting that can also be customized for different parts of the organization or user groups. This solution generally integrated well with our organization; this should be assessed for your organization.
Not every Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) System does not cover all the industry verticals and all the functionalities and requirements for a specific industry as built-in features. Although IFS Applications does not completely cover all the requirements and all the industry verticals, it can be implemented for any industrial company with minimum configurations and customization, which is very good when implementing an ERP system. Since it supports web and mobile versions of the application as well, the users ind it easy to use.
Infor Enterprise Asset Management doesn't step the user through the process easily. The user must already know the process and how to step through it. But I still don't see this as a very big issue.
Would like a separate mobile program to handle the parts side of the equation (receiving, put-up, counting, etc.).
The mobile program could do a better job of handling fleet assets. Currently, a lot of configuration and customization is used to get the mobile program to work appropriately in a fleet environment.
EAM is overall simple to use, especially since the UI and individual forms can be configured per user group with simple clicks by a system administrator.
In overall, the companies get many advantages, where we can forget most of the things which can be considered for room for improvement. The user interface is good. It supports mobile versions an has several mobile applications for specific areas with Android, IOS and Windows versions. It allows several deployment options such as remote hosting, IFS Cloud hosting and on-premise hosting of the servers. IFS Applications can be easily and safely integrated with other systems.
The user support is better than average when comparing it to other software vendors we use. Normally they reply very quickly, but there is also a tendency to even reply too fast without fully analyzing or understanding the whole underlying problem. However, when we ask support to escalate something to the development team, this is done quickly as well.
We have been unable to get answers to our questions, solutions to our problems, and they don't seem interested in working in the construction industry.
Microsoft AX, QAD (in continuation of our previous ERP), Sage X3 was an out of the box ERP that was part of initial RFP. We have chosen IFS based on the compromise between costs & budget, functionality, technical features, and feedback from similar customers that gave their feedback. The project manager team and qualification level of technical or consultant teams were differentiating factors too. Finally IFS application was named in the Gartner’s mid-market ERP Magic Quadrant, along with SAP, and helped us to finalize our choice