HP Anyware vs. OCI Virtual Desktop

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
HP Anyware
Score 6.9 out of 10
N/A
HP Anyware is enterprise software that offers secure remote access to digital workspaces. It is based on Teradici, which was acquired by HP in 2021.N/A
Oracle VDI
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) can be used to deploy managed virtual desktops and access them from anywhere while keeping data and applications safe.N/A
Pricing
HP AnywareOCI Virtual Desktop
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
HP AnywareOracle VDI
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
HP AnywareOCI Virtual Desktop
User Ratings
HP AnywareOCI Virtual Desktop
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(0 ratings)
2.5
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
HP AnywareOCI Virtual Desktop
Likelihood to Recommend
I haven't used it as much over WAN connections but I am familiar with Teradici's efficiency over slow links. In our LAN, environment, the best feature is central management and small footprint. These primarily go into lab, testing and kiosk areas due to minimal hardware outlay and easier to lock down.
Read full review
For large and mid-sized organizations utilizing massive virtual desktop deployments, Oracle VDI offers great value. It supports a wide range of operating systems like Linux, Solaris, Windows etc.
Read full review
Pros
  • Management of zero clients and their configuration
  • Efficient use of bandwidth for sound and video
  • Reliable drivers
Read full review
  • Ease of Manageability. Accessing and managing multiple virtualized desktop environments is pretty straightforward.
  • Great Options for Keeping Track of Logins. Detailed reports of who has been logging into which environment are easy to configure.
  • File Systems Can Be Shared. You can set multiple desktop environments to be able to share data on the same file system.
Read full review
Cons
  • What was once free is no longer free, that is, management
  • Version compatibility between different generations is complicated
  • Not the most compatible solution
Read full review
  • In our use of Oracle VDI, we have found there is a significant lag time when using the desktop environments through it, rather than the standalone virtual desktops.
  • Real time reporting and statistics can be improved as well.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
From the end user's perspective the usability is not impacted at all.
Read full review
Performance
No answers on this topic
The easiest way to describe the performance is like this - when it is working, it works almost flawlessly. When it starts freezing, your day is going to get very interesting very quickly. As I have stated earlier, I used it for one purpose, and it did what I needed it to most of the time, but I did have issues with it.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
VMware Blast! is now VMware's standard for VDI. It has some features that make it better in a VMware environment. Existing PCoIP systems we have are Teradici-based so I am glad that standard is still available. When it comes to hardware, Teradici is still the most available so we continue to choose them.
Read full review
VMware Horizon does everything that Oracle VDI is capable of doing and offers many more features, and unlike Oracle VDI, it is still receiving constant updates. Oracle VDI was a great solution for enterprise-level management of virtualized desktop when it was getting updates, but now that it won't be getting any, I would put it in the "outdated technology" category.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Failure rate of devices is really low
  • Even without firmware updates, zero clients remain useful years after placement
  • Zero clients and virtualized desktops infrastructure is competitive with dedicated PC's
Read full review
  • When I used it full-time it worked for what I needed it - positive.
  • When it crashed, it costed me in time to wait to get it back up - negative.
  • Took up less space than using live machines - positive.
Read full review
ScreenShots