TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Hitachi Storage Virtualization Operating System (SVOS) vs. IBM Spectrum Virtualize

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Hitachi Storage Virtualization Operating System (SVOS)

    Score10 out of 10
    N/AHitachi Vantara offers the Hitachi Storage Virtualization Operating System (SVOS) as a virtualization management solution.N/A

    IBM Spectrum Virtualize

    Score10 out of 10
    N/AIBM Spectrum Virtualize supports provides data storage security and control across hybrid environments.N/A
    Pricing
    Hitachi Storage Virtualization Operating System (SVOS)IBM Spectrum Virtualize
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Hitachi Storage Virtualization Operating System (SVOS)IBM Spectrum Virtualize
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Best Alternatives
    Hitachi Storage Virtualization Operating System (SVOS)IBM Spectrum Virtualize
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    Cyberduck
    Score9.8 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    SolarWinds Virtualization Manager (VMAN)
    Score10 out of 10
    Cisco UCS Manager
    Score9.6 out of 10
    Enterprises
    OpenManage Integration for VMware vCenter
    Score9 out of 10
    Cisco UCS Manager
    Score9.6 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Hitachi Storage Virtualization Operating System (SVOS)IBM Spectrum Virtualize
    Likelihood to Recommend
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    10.0
    (2 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Hitachi Storage Virtualization Operating System (SVOS)IBM Spectrum Virtualize
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Hitachi Vantara
    Hitachi SVOS is well suited for all environment in todays world. Storage plays a pivot role in all services provided in the current digital age. The Hitachi SVOS along with their blade proides magnificient perfromance boost which is not comparable to any vendors. Companies which has a huge database should consider this an option to evaluate. In addition orgnization who has a highly virtualized enviroment could also look at this product during their evaluation stage. This product is less benfit due to its cost in an environment where they have more number of physical servers as there are other solution which can be leveraged at a lower costs as they would not be utilizing the full feature set provided by the appliance
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    Saves hours of staff time copying data from one Disk Array/Block Storage to newer system without impacting the servers that are using the SAN. We have virtualized storage like VMware/HyperVee virtualizes servers. Takes the complications out of being a SAN administrator.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Hitachi Vantara
    • Intergreation of legancy storage solutions
    • Single pane for future storage configurations
    • Amazing replication capability for disaster recovery purposes
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    • Provision drives over fiber and/or iSCSI connections
    • Perform volume replications between 2 storages efficiently
    • The ability to virtualize other storage and make it easy to provision
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Hitachi Vantara
    • Ease of use can be increased so that SMB segment could leverage without the need of having a storage administrator
    • Firmware upgrade for the legancy storage device from HSVOS pane
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    • Costly but worth every dime in staff hours saved
    • Each generation has its limits on Fibre Channel speed it supports and one must upgrade the nodes to get to higher speeds
    • User Interface is now light speed ahead of where it started.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Hitachi Vantara
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    The equipment is easy to configure, implement and manage, it does not require investing a lot of time to manage them since they are very reliable and secure.The equipment is easy to configure, implement and manage, and does not require a lot of time to manage it as it is very reliable and secure.Its components are not easily damaged and any alert that occurs can be quickly corrected without interrupting services.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Hitachi Vantara
    There is definitely no comparison to any of the products when comparing to Hitachi SVOS. I beleieve this is the only unique product which can leverage older storage systems. Dell Avamar can be a great product if you are considering DR replication alone. The DR replication ratio is quite high in Dell avamar. However given that the current bandwidth available outweights this benefit
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    IBM Spectrum Protect Virtualize beats ALL competition hands down, and one does not need to deal with the complications that are put into some of the Disk Array/ block Storage systems. Excellent Storage management and can see performance of your SAN that goes thru it easily.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Hitachi Vantara
    • It is quite an expensive solution compared to other vendors so we cant expect a ROI within 3 years time as always.
    • 3 years has been a standard ROI review, however storage solution like Hitachi SVOS are meant to lasts for a longer period like 6 years in my consideration.
    • However, this solution provides a great benefit to make use of legacy appliances.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    • Positively, it has generated good initial sales for us and with proper management, the growth of application operations generates more services to manage.
    • Positively, the growth of the operation has also helped the team to update its capabilities in order to grow.
    • The only possible disadvantage is that since the equipment is very reliable and durable, technological change is not easy to make. Clients prefer to grow the equipment while they can rather than make a complete change, but even so, the time comes when all this produces more services.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots