Hitachi Content Platform (HCP) vs. IBM Storage Protect

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Hitachi Content Platform (HCP)
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Hitachi Content Platform (HCP) is a scalable object storage platform with enterprise-level security, for archiving, backup, and content/data sharing.N/A
IBM Storage Protect
Score 7.4 out of 10
N/A
IBM Storage Protect (formerly IBM Spectrum Protect, or Tivoli Storage Manager) provides data resilience for physical file servers, virtual environments, and applications. Organizations can scale up to manage billions of objects per backup server.N/A
Pricing
Hitachi Content Platform (HCP)IBM Storage Protect
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Hitachi Content Platform (HCP)IBM Storage Protect
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Hitachi Content Platform (HCP)IBM Storage Protect
Features
Hitachi Content Platform (HCP)IBM Storage Protect
Data Center Backup
Comparison of Data Center Backup features of Product A and Product B
Hitachi Content Platform (HCP)
-
Ratings
IBM Storage Protect
7.9
Ratings
7% below category average
Universal recovery00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Instant recovery00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Recovery verification00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Business application protection00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Multiple backup destinations00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Incremental backup identification00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Backup to the cloud00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Deduplication and file compression00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Snapshots00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Flexible deployment00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Management dashboard00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Platform support00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Retention options00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Encryption00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
User Ratings
Hitachi Content Platform (HCP)IBM Storage Protect
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
1.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.2
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Hitachi Content Platform (HCP)IBM Storage Protect
Likelihood to Recommend
Best for cases where performance is not an issue.
Read full review
Tivoli does well running file-level backups, but Exchange is clunky and restores are really hard. With no SharePoint agent, if you use SharePoint you will need another product like AvePoint DocAve. The web-based GUI console is MUCH improved over earlier versions, but you will still need to be a command-line guru to make Tivoli do everything, and local (node) config files still rule. This product was originally ported from Unix and retains may of its 'nix roots.
Read full review
Pros
  • HCP/HDI interface works like charm. it's easy to deploy and scale.
  • Hitachi customer support is at par with expectations
  • More cost effective than EMC/NetApp solutions.
Read full review
  • Tight integration with Db2. As an IBM product, it works seamlessly with Db2. You can query what is stored in TSM via Db2 itself. You can also use DB scripts to maintain the items being stored there.
  • Like most of its competitors, Tivoli handles deduplication well.
  • Provides a GUI for browsing and maintaining items stored there. I rarely use this feature, due to the next item I will post:
  • Command-line interface directly from my Db2 database servers.
  • Both client and server-side deduplication, compression and encryption are available.
  • If the requirements are zLinux and DB2 support then it's the most solid solution.
  • Can be complex to implement, but once up and running, it is rock-solid and immensely scalable.
  • Scalability is huge. Can be added onto easily.
Read full review
Cons
  • Cost structure is by capacity and is expensive
  • Some access settings are mutually exclusive for performance (REST vs. CIFS)
  • QoS by Tenant requires use of external ADC (Hitachi suggested and sold us Pulse Secure) and their support on this product offering is not up to their normally high standard
Read full review
  • Deployment and configuration is not easy for an unexperienced IBM Spectrum Protect administrator
  • Operations center uses a lot of data and needs a lot of storage for larger environments
  • Have not seen a redbook about it in the past 10 years
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
Not required, company closed. TSM is not used in my current role at my current job.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
It is suitable for a huge part of our organisation, supports many operating systems (including Windows, Linux and IBM AIX), supports many databases - also for online backups (like Oracle, Db2 and SAP HANA), has an Operational Center for control, command-line and GUI for backup/restore. It just works well, once setup correctly.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
The few times we've called for support we eventually got an answer, but it's IBM and a very big company and getting to a support agent is hard.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
[Hitachi Content Platform (HCP)] has all of the features of competitive offerings and wraps them in a better multi-tenancy solution. It's object level permission model and non-overridable immutability (in Compliance mode for configured namespaces) is a bump up compared to other solutions. It's offering of it's own API as well as S3 REST support make it very flexible.
Read full review
We have been using TSM (former ADSM), rebranded Spectrum Protect and now rebranded Storage Protect a long time already. The product served us well. Last time we compared it to competitors we found they all had something lacking. And switching backup suites is no small task if there is data you need to keep 5, 7 or 10 years anyway. Commvault gets close, but doesn't match all features.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Best on premise solution of its' kind that encapsulates all our needs
  • ROI has been positive but it does raise questions at renewal time in terms of cost/GB vs other 2nd tier storage types
Read full review
  • It can be used as a disaster recovery solution when you have the right configuration (either replication or tape copies in a safe location). This way it can be a lifesaver for any company.
  • It can bring back the information you need if you are hit by ransomeware.
  • It is also needed if you are accounting for user error, sometimes people delete the files they need by accident and without a backup solution they are out of luck
Read full review
ScreenShots