TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    eMaint CMMS

    Score6.7 out of 10
    N/AeMaint offers computerized maintenance management software with features for inventory management, asset management, maintenance scheduling, etc. eMaint is now owned and supported by Fluke Corp since the September 2016 acquisition.

    $69

    per month per user

    Hippo CMMS

    Score2 out of 10
    Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
    Hippo CMMS is a maintenance management software tool for organizations of all sizes. It is a SaaS solution offering a customized interface designed to suit users' operational maintenance needs. The vendor states that Hippo’s UX design principle has always been the same: features only have value if they're easy to find and use, and so they state their layout is clean and intuitive, making the software a breeze to learn. Hippo CMMS has been providing maintenance software to…

    $35

    per month per user

    Pricing
    eMaint CMMSHippo CMMS
    Editions & Modules
    Team
    $69
    per month per user
    Professional
    $85
    per month per user
    Enterprise
    $120
    per month per user
    Hippo Starter
    $35
    per month per user
    Hippo Plus
    $55
    per month per user
    Hippo Pro
    $75
    per month per user
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    eMaint CMMSHippo CMMS
    Free Trial
    YesYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    YesYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup fee$600 Single User
    Additional DetailsHippo CMMS subscription pricing is determined based on the number of users. A user is anyone that needs to log in and access Hippo' s core features. Users include managers, owners, technicians, and supervisors. Maintenance requesters are not users. Price is also determined by required features. We have pricing plans for complex operations that require deeper functionality and plans for simple operations that are new to CMMS.
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    eMaint CMMSHippo CMMS
    Considered Both Products
    Fluke Corporation
    No answer on this topic
    Eptura (formerly Condeco and iOFFICE + SpaceIQ)
    Chose Hippo CMMS
    Hippo CMMS was more user friendly for my maintenance men then the other software programs we tested. The difference was really how easy Hippo is to use navigate. Also the price point was a little better then the competitors. The calendar view really helped sell us on the …
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    88%
    Would buy again
    7 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    88%
    Delivers good value for the price
    7 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    88%
    Happy with the feature set
    7 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    88%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    7 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    8 Answers
    User Ratings
    eMaint CMMSHippo CMMS
    Likelihood to Recommend
    6.2
    (6 ratings)
    2.0
    (8 ratings)
    Support Rating
    5.5
    (2 ratings)
    8.6
    (4 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    eMaint CMMSHippo CMMS
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Fluke Corporation
    eMaint is well suited to larger facilities with dedicated scheduler/planners. Learning to navigate the database and create reports requires a dedicated resource. Part-time users often forget the process for entering data and navigating the database. In smaller organizations where multiple users enter assets, planned maintenance (PM) tasks and vendors, keeping standardization in the system formatting was difficult.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Eptura (formerly Condeco and iOFFICE + SpaceIQ)
    I find that Hippo [CMMS] is really well suited for any scenario. Most CMMS are geared toward manufacturing or industrial use, Hippo [CMMS] works as well for a school or church as it would for a factory. The ease of use for the requestor makes it an ideal platform for any institution.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Fluke Corporation
    • We like that eMaint is highly configurable. You can customize fields to meet your needs
    • You can store and track documents and photos assigned to your assets
    • You can run custom reports.
    • Great customer service
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Eptura (formerly Condeco and iOFFICE + SpaceIQ)
    • Simple to use Work requester.
    • Great customer service and support.
    • Not filled with non-essential items like a lot of "Larger" company CMMS systems
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Fluke Corporation
    • Functionality not delivered as promised - on usage of tab.
    • QR code functionality.
    • Friction between implementation team and marketing team that sold this to us.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Eptura (formerly Condeco and iOFFICE + SpaceIQ)
    • Completed work order reporting can be improved. It seems harder than it should be to get the data I need.
    • I would like to streamline the work order closing procedure. I feel like it takes longer than it should to open various screens and add labor, mark tasks complete, change status, etc. It is a minor inconvenience, but just waiting a few seconds opening up a new window is time-consuming with many WO at a time.
    • Labor tracking and reporting could be improved.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Fluke Corporation
    Customer support was always readily available, even when natural disasters were taking place.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Eptura (formerly Condeco and iOFFICE + SpaceIQ)
    I've used Hippo for several years now. I'm sure other programs have been developed since I did my comparison testing. But Hippo has always done everything we needed it to do. It's very reliable. My guys don't doubt whether or not it's doing its job. The calendar view, ease of use and floor mapping set this program apart from others.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Fluke Corporation
    eMaint was by far most the most comprehensive and customizable solution we looked at. The eMaint team was also extremely responsive and available during the selection process. The product training and conferences were very helpful for new user orientation and best practice learning. The customizable reports also allowed us to provide data to management in an easy to digest format
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Eptura (formerly Condeco and iOFFICE + SpaceIQ)
    Ease of end-user to put in a task that they would like to have completed. Hippo is really easy to use and to complete tasks. If a person putting in a task includes their email or phone number we can get ahold of them to ask and questions and it lets them know progress of their task.
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Fluke Corporation
    • We easily track service events over multiple locations so we are able to save on costs
    • Able to run asset lists for inspections
    • Able to keep up with contracts' renewals and service costs
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Eptura (formerly Condeco and iOFFICE + SpaceIQ)
    • Allows tracking something that we did not have before
    • Decision making is now with hard data
    • Replacement and repair cost have been reduced with tracking of maintenance.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Hippo CMMS Screenshots

    Product screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshot