HashiCorp Terraform vs. Red Hat CodeReady Workspaces

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
HashiCorp Terraform
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
Terraform from HashiCorp is a cloud infrastructure automation tool that enables users to create, change, and improve production infrastructure, and it allows infrastructure to be expressed as code. It codifies APIs into declarative configuration files that can be shared amongst team members, treated as code, edited, reviewed, and versioned. It is available Open Source, and via Cloud and Self-Hosted editions.
$0
Red Hat CodeReady Workspaces
Score 9.9 out of 10
N/A
Red Hat CodeReady Workspaces uses Kubernetes and containers to provide any member of the development or IT team with a consistent, secure, and zero-configuration development environment. It is the next stage of the former Codenvy.io, owned and supported by Red Hat since the May 2017 acquisition, which was presented as a customizable containerized developer workspace that handles provisioning, scaling, and stopping.N/A
Pricing
HashiCorp TerraformRed Hat CodeReady Workspaces
Editions & Modules
Open Source
$0
Team & Governance
$20/user
per user/per month
Enterprise
Contact sales team
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
HashiCorp TerraformRed Hat CodeReady Workspaces
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
HashiCorp TerraformRed Hat CodeReady Workspaces
Features
HashiCorp TerraformRed Hat CodeReady Workspaces
Configuration Management
Comparison of Configuration Management features of Product A and Product B
HashiCorp Terraform
7.9
Ratings
2% below category average
Red Hat CodeReady Workspaces
-
Ratings
Infrastructure Automation9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated Provisioning8.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Parallel Execution6.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Node Management7.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Reporting & Logging7.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Version Control8.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
HashiCorp TerraformRed Hat CodeReady Workspaces
Small Businesses
HashiCorp Vagrant
HashiCorp Vagrant
Score 10.0 out of 10
HashiCorp Terraform
HashiCorp Terraform
Score 8.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Ansible
Ansible
Score 9.2 out of 10
Ansible
Ansible
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
Ansible
Ansible
Score 9.2 out of 10
Ansible
Ansible
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
HashiCorp TerraformRed Hat CodeReady Workspaces
Likelihood to Recommend
8.4
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
9.4
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.4
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
9.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
HashiCorp TerraformRed Hat CodeReady Workspaces
Likelihood to Recommend
8 because it's currently best-in-class and is completely essential to use in contrast to not expressing your infrastructure as code. That said, new contenders are nipping at its heels, and I expect stronger tools to emerge in the coming years. Hopefully the Terraform team is able to keep pace.
Read full review
We have a team of 500 people so it's most reliable and scalable if any new joinees. That way user's can directly create their own workspace and start working and share the work stack throughout development teams securely, to update and modify any upcoming events. The best thing about Red Hat Workspace is it's simple, with all Runtime libraries pre-installed, so no need to request a platform from Azure or any other platform provider just log in and start creating a workspace. It has version control so can easily import GIT projects can start work without worrying we don't have Java, Python or any other platform not installed just select the platform needed and start working.
Read full review
Pros
  • Terraform is cloud agnostic. Just select the suitable provider for the cloud and it will do the job.
  • Templating is possible to make the Terraform templates reusable.
  • Variables can be created to make the templates generic so that it can be reused for different environments or resources.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Cons
  • The errors generated by the plan and preview commands are pretty cryptic, it can be hard for newcomers to the scripting language to understand how to address problems.
  • Access controls around workspaces is limited which makes it harder to secure reduce the scope of teams ability.
  • Analytics around user usage, applies and plans would be helpful for managemenet.
Read full review
  • Can improve UI like Visual studio so that VS user's can switch without any difficulty.
Read full review
Usability
I love Terraform and I think it has done some great things for people that are working to automate their provisioning processes and also for those that are in the process of moving to the cloud or managing cloud resources. There are some quirks to HCL that take a little bit of getting used to and give picking up Terraform a little bit of a learning curve, thus the rating
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Performance
Terraform's performance is quite amazing when it comes to deployment of resources in AWS. Of course, the deployment times depend on various parameters like the number of resources to deploy and different regions to deploy. Terraform cannot control that. The only minor drawback probably shows up when a terraform job is terminated mid way. Then in many cases, time-consuming manual cleanup is required.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Terraform is community driven but does offer support for it's Enterprise product. When contacting the team at HashiCorp we have always gotten resolution to our issues. They have been very responsive in returning our calls and answering our questions as they come up. We are currently using the open source model.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
dbt was fine, but you end up with an extremely bloated repo/project. Often where all of the models are the same, named similarly, and generally just doesn't adhere to the concept of DRY coding. In Terraform we're able to template a lot of this work and dynamically generate assets based on variables instead.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • Using code, we are able to build and deploy cloud resources faster and more consistently than producing the same resources in the console manually.
  • For applications that share architectures, we can reuse code to expedite development. We can also do the same with modules that are shared across the organization.
  • By defining all of our resources as code, we can deploy complete environments with "batteries included." For example, we can use code that spins up servers in a cloud provider and at the same time, creates monitors with in our monitoring provider. Likewise, when the servers are decommissioned, the monitors are decommed along with them. In the past, the creation and decom of the monitors would have been a disjointed, manual step. With Terraform we get it all with one "terraform apply."
Read full review
  • No need to request for any platform again and again.
Read full review
ScreenShots

HashiCorp Terraform Screenshots

Screenshot of Terraform StateScreenshot of Terraform RunsScreenshot of Terraform VariablesScreenshot of Terraform WorkspacesScreenshot of Terraform Cost Estimation