Gumlet is used by businesses to host and deliver video content and optimized images across websites and applications at any scale. Gumlet Video: Video Hosting and Streaming Multi-Level Video Protection: Safeguards content with advanced DRM solutions like Widevine and Fairplay, preventing unauthorized access while allowing for controlled playback. Video Management: Users can upload, organize, and stream videos. Integration with cloud storage simplifies…
$19
per month $0.15 / GB streaming overage after 2 TB of bandwidth
JW Player
Score 9.8 out of 10
N/A
JW Player (or JWP) is a video platform boasting 40,000 broadcasters, publishers, and other video-driven brands whose business relies on video as users. It provides these companies with a way to accelerate and scale their video strategy and is a video platform that can be used to stream video, engage audiences on any screen, and monetize content.
N/A
Pricing
Gumlet
JW Player
Editions & Modules
Starter
$19
per month $0.15 / GB streaming overage after 2 TB of bandwidth
Growth
$59
per month
Business
$259
per month
Enterprise
On request
per year
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Gumlet
JW Player
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
Discount available for annual pricing.
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Gumlet
JW Player
Features
Gumlet
JW Player
Video Marketing
Comparison of Video Marketing features of Product A and Product B
Gumlet
-
Ratings
JW Player
8.6
2 Ratings
14% above category average
Support for advertisements
00 Ratings
9.12 Ratings
Video SEO
00 Ratings
8.12 Ratings
Video Security
Comparison of Video Security features of Product A and Product B
Gumlet
-
Ratings
JW Player
7.8
3 Ratings
13% below category average
Video access controls
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
User management
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Video link sharing
00 Ratings
7.03 Ratings
External video
00 Ratings
6.02 Ratings
Video Player
Comparison of Video Player features of Product A and Product B
Gumlet
-
Ratings
JW Player
7.0
3 Ratings
19% below category average
Player customization
00 Ratings
2.03 Ratings
Embedded videos
00 Ratings
6.03 Ratings
Video quality / Bandwidth controls
00 Ratings
10.03 Ratings
Mobile compatibility
00 Ratings
10.03 Ratings
Video Analytics
Comparison of Video Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Gumlet
-
Ratings
JW Player
1.0
3 Ratings
155% below category average
Per viewer tracking
00 Ratings
1.01 Ratings
Per video tracking
00 Ratings
1.02 Ratings
Video analytics dashboard
00 Ratings
1.03 Ratings
Video Hosting, Management & Storage
Comparison of Video Hosting, Management & Storage features of Product A and Product B
I think Gumlet is suitable for any content creator that makes videos for clients as well as for small businesses that want to host videos on their website to promote their products/services. If you want to make quick videos sharing your screen you have to do this using a different tool then export your footage and manually upload to Gumlet so it's not ideal for that
JW Player has flexible plans that won't cost you a lot of money. If you are a startup, JW offers a variety of plans that will suit your specific needs and grow with you as your company grows. You do not need to be a video expert to understand how to upload a video, which allows nearly anyone in the office to do it.
1 is because I have purchased the lifetime offer from Appsumo, therefore does not need to renew any subscription from Gumlet, however the monthly subscription of the custom domain is makes us quite limited in terms of using 1 account to host few domains.
Just made the decision to renew given demonstrated improvements being made to the platform to expand compatibility for its player use on devices such as Apple TV, as well as improvements made recently to its JW Platform Dashboard
It is already at a very good place in terms of delivering what it is intended to do. Of course, there are always opportunities to improve. Gumlet is replacing strong video hosting services like Vimeo, YouTube, Wistia etc. so it needs to be positioned to deliver video streaming competitively to be relevant and worth recommending.
Reliability and compatibility on a majority of platforms. Would have received a 10 except recent versions of browsers such as Firefox are now defaulting against Flash components and thus prompting approval from users BEFORE loading which is a HUGE obstacle to an effective user experience thus creating concerns by end-users unnecessarily and risking that they will NOT accept the prompts, thus leaving unable to view video content hosted using the JW Player. Assurances by JW support suggest they will resolve this, so we'll see...
This is probably the biggest factor for Gumlet. Their support team is fantastic and always professional. Most support inquiries through their chat get answered in minutes.
Support is reasonable. I from time to time have made suggestions on improvements that would be nice to see (like the ability to have a clickable link within the video - that is easy to create, without tons of coding) and it seems as though I never see it happen or get much response to "suggestions" to upgrade the software. The good news, other than a few things as I mentioned above, overall, I don't have many "technical issues" in the platform, which is a good thing. On occasion, I have seen some "issues" with the delivery of the video, but it has been pretty scarce. So it is dependable.
One of the primary features promoted by JW Platform is its SEO definition. However, there did not seem to be a way to integrate that data to our platform if selected thus only leaving the benefits of that data to be established on the individual video page hosted by JW Platform, which isn't useful in the end to the client value we are trying to deliver for our VideoproFile.net solution
Some of our clients use VimeoLivestream and find it overly complicated. Gumlet hasn't released it yet, but considering how easy it is to use their other services, I trust it will be just as easy to live stream - with the bonus of the content protection. Vimeo is overpriced for what they offer, and charge for DRM as an additional add-on on top of their industry-grade CDN. Wistia doesn't have download protection. Way too easy to download and resell content.
JW had more player options, a better/more intuitive user interface, was altogether faster both in rendering the uploaded videos and in time to load on the web page. The integration with OpenX for pre-roll was faster and easier than with Brightcove, and lastly, they offered a great price for service.