GTreasury vs. SAP Treasury and Risk Management

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
GTreasury
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
GTreasury offers their treasury management system for funds and transfer management, liquidity tracking, customizable accounting rules with ERP integration, and other liquidity management features.N/A
SAP Treasury and Risk Management
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
SAP Treasury and Risk Management for enterprises provides enhanced cash and liquidity planning, among other treasury management features.N/A
Pricing
GTreasurySAP Treasury and Risk Management
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
GTreasurySAP Treasury and Risk Management
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
GTreasurySAP Treasury and Risk Management
Features
GTreasurySAP Treasury and Risk Management
Treasury Management
Comparison of Treasury Management features of Product A and Product B
GTreasury
-
Ratings
SAP Treasury and Risk Management
8.1
Ratings
7% above category average
Cash and Liquidity Management00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Financial Fraud Prevention00 Ratings3.00 Ratings
Treasury Management Payments00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Bank Account Management00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Treasury Risk Management00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Treasury Reporting00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Liquidity Forecasting00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Market Data00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
User Ratings
GTreasurySAP Treasury and Risk Management
Likelihood to Recommend
8.4
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
5.7
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
3.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
1.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
GTreasurySAP Treasury and Risk Management
Likelihood to Recommend
It is well-suited for providing information about what cash is available and its future outlook of it. It helped us to link the multiple bank accounts that we have globally into one consolidated location. We were then able to ensure that we had the cash required to meet the various business needs that we have.
Read full review
This tool is extremely helpful for pulling visit data reports on a weekly, monthly, quarterly, and yearly basis for our health center. It allows for timely and concise reporting in a generally straightforward and user-friendly platform. It can be challenging to discontinue some reports after we no longer need them but otherwise I have no real complaints.
Read full review
Pros
  • Reporting automates bank balance view(s) by sending daily email recipients.
  • [It] includes the GL account coding on the funding templates to automate the posting of JEs for that transaction.
  • [It] synergizes bank transactions via a single portal rather than multiple logins for multiple bank platforms.
Read full review
  • Integrate CashFLows in a easy way
  • Have your financial data on your fingertips
  • Have all your information on Real time Dashboard
  • Seamless integration
Read full review
Cons
  • IHB should be created as a separate module and not be spread out across multiple functions
  • CAMT script that is currently used should be replaced by an actual plugin
  • Reporting module needs to be more user friendly and allow users to extract larger data sets
  • An ability to view a bank statement on-screen w/o extracting it into PDF would go a long way. Different from Balance Explorer.
Read full review
  • It would be nice if all reports could have the same recurrence options (some reports allow for the date range to be the last full month while others require a specific date range).
  • It is difficult to discontinue some recurring reports that are no longer used.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
[I feel] it's too hard to use and navigate around [and] very difficult to manage/administer. We may keep it because [I feel] we [have] already gone through the pain point and don't want to risk going through that again. Unfortunately, if we keep it, [I believe] it's not because we love it.
Read full review
Customer gets on hold all projects till end of the 2Q 2023. Only support tasks are given.
Read full review
Usability
For me, reporting is very important and I just don't find it very user-friendly. [To me,] the location of certain functions is also confusing which I resort to using the search function. [In my case,] I have had two conversations with two different people in GTreasury and they both also agreed with me on this. They also said to just use the search function. [I believe] a lot of the reporting areas could be updated and made better. [I feel that] unless you have had a lot of training, a user would have a very hard time customizing reports. [In my experience,] even GTreasury employees agreed with me on this one.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Day-to-day support is very quick and responsive. However, if you need to go the second level it might take longer and you lose the visibility.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Weekly meetings and updates a plus Set realistic timeline expectations Have a good project manager Make sure everyone is following the same time line and dependencies list Keep track of a future state or out of scope list You may need to change the scope and do a project request form change, that's OK if you determine a key function has been missed Don't be afraid to extend the timeline to make sure through testing has been done prior to going live Document set up decisions, how reports and worksheets work, and why certain user codes are or are not in the positioning reports.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
I have used Orbit and Kyriba in the past. Orbit from [a] previous company. It was fairly user-friendly even though it does not have all the bells and whistles. What I liked most about Orbit is the customer service. Everyone was very responsive. We chose GTreasury because we all agreed it appears to have everything we needed. The demos we received looked great and looked easy to use. The reporting function seemed very robust. The account manager assigned to us at the time, Jake, was great. He was very responsive and helpful. His responsiveness was also one of the reasons why we probably went with GTreasury because we felt like we had someone advocating for us.
Read full review
Some of the edges I have found are [the] following: Risk universe building support and navigation, Transactions back to back stacking and control on [the] roll out if your logic, Integration with risk and compliance dashboard, ease of customizing reporting dashboards both from the perspectives of treasury transactions along with risk Profiling and risk reporting.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Very positive ROI allowing us to take our daily cash target down to 1% of total admitted Assts. Prior to GTreasury we were running close to 20%.
  • Reduced bank service cost initially by $300,000+ and annually a minimum of $50,000.
  • Allowed us to maintain and streamline Treasury Staff FTE level, with the ability to train other areas for self service payment research, so the Treasury Analyst can focus on value added analysis tasks.
Read full review
  • SAP TRM definitely integrates well the carious core ERP and treasury functions and thus reducing the finance cost for the treasury activities.
  • Shared Services framework helps to further optimize the operations
Read full review
ScreenShots