Graylog vs. IBM Security QRadar SIEM

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Graylog
Score 7.5 out of 10
N/A
Graylog, headquartered in Houston, offers their eponymous platform for centralized log management that helps users find meaning in data faster so as to take action immediately. Graylog is available via Enterprise and Cloud plans, but also has a Small Business Plan, and an Open (free) plan with limited features.N/A
IBM Security QRadar SIEM
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
IBM Security QRadar is security information and event management (SIEM) Software.N/A
Pricing
GraylogIBM Security QRadar SIEM
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
GraylogIBM Security QRadar SIEM
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
GraylogIBM Security QRadar SIEM
Features
GraylogIBM Security QRadar SIEM
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
Comparison of Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) features of Product A and Product B
Graylog
-
Ratings
IBM Security QRadar SIEM
8.5
Ratings
9% above category average
Centralized event and log data collection00 Ratings9.90 Ratings
Correlation00 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Event and log normalization/management00 Ratings9.50 Ratings
Deployment flexibility00 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Integration with Identity and Access Management Tools00 Ratings8.90 Ratings
Custom dashboards and workspaces00 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Host and network-based intrusion detection00 Ratings9.70 Ratings
Data integration/API management00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Behavioral analytics and baselining00 Ratings7.60 Ratings
Rules-based and algorithmic detection thresholds00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Response orchestration and automation00 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Reporting and compliance management00 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Incident indexing/searching00 Ratings8.90 Ratings
Best Alternatives
GraylogIBM Security QRadar SIEM
Small Businesses
SolarWinds Papertrail
SolarWinds Papertrail
Score 8.9 out of 10
LevelBlue USM Anywhere
LevelBlue USM Anywhere
Score 3.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Sumo Logic
Sumo Logic
Score 9.4 out of 10
Sumo Logic
Sumo Logic
Score 9.4 out of 10
Enterprises
Sumo Logic
Sumo Logic
Score 9.4 out of 10
Sumo Logic
Sumo Logic
Score 9.4 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
GraylogIBM Security QRadar SIEM
Likelihood to Recommend
7.8
(0 ratings)
8.4
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
3.6
(0 ratings)
8.1
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
8.1
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
GraylogIBM Security QRadar SIEM
Likelihood to Recommend
If you already have a basic understanding of Elasticsearch and/or MongoDB, Graylog will be a great fit when it comes to log aggregation. It will be a decent option even if you don't have any experience but have the time and willingness to roll up your sleeves that learning those tools will require. Graylog supports plugins to extend functionality for things like SNMP traps, telemetry collection, and solar flares. As is the case with most software with plugins, if the core functionality for which you are looking (i.e. not logging) is based on a plugin, Graylog probably isn't for you. The majority of the plugins in the marketplace are developed by third-parties looking to solve their specific use case so bug fixes and new features are not a given.
Read full review
QRadar is very well suited on environments where there are not multiple tenants or domains, we do have success on this kind of scenario. IBM Security QRadar SIEM is less appropriate for environments with multiple tenants, specially when each tenant represent a different End Costumer (such as for MSSP companies), those environments require a high amount of rules and building blocks replications, since each tenant will have its own "BB definitions", servers, rules exception, etc. Also, some information, such as EPS count or EPS dropped are generated by QRadar's own log sources, which takes place on default domain, therefore users associated with different domain can not have access to those logs, even when the information is related to other domain's environment. For example, even if Event Collector 1 is associated to Domain A, the log informing its dropped EPS is generated by System notification, log source that must be associated to Default domain.
Read full review
Pros
  • The free edition is extraordinarily powerful.
  • Log searching is quick.
  • The web interface is sleek, and the install is relatively quick.
Read full review
  • Enables identification and prioritization of vulnerabilities in IT infrastructure for corrective action.
  • Facilitates security incident investigation and forensic analysis.
  • Provides a real-time view of security events, enabling immediate incident response.
  • Can integrate with external threat intelligence sources to enrich data and improve threat detection.
  • Enables the generation of detailed and customized reports.
Read full review
Cons
  • The graphs and visualizations are limited on the dashboard if there were more options it would be better for different kinds of data.
Read full review
  • Need to spend more time configuring the system to properly interpret and normalize different type of data collected from multiple resources.
  • While Rule creation QRadar uses that rules to detect security threats and generate alerts, but to creating and managing rules is bit complex & tedious work to complete.
  • IBM Security QRadar SIEM is excellent in handling large & complex systems that requires in-depth knowledge and extensive training to configure and maintain the system which includes upgrading, optimization of performance & issue troubleshooting.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
With the arrival of IBM Security QRadar SIEM at our company, we have a better vision of all the security needs that may arise, it is a very safe software to use that prevents threats from damaging our IT environment, it is impossible to change it for another software.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
As a grade I give 8 as QRadar is not easy to learn. It requires some time to master it. It also needs a team of people actively working on the product. Once you learn to use it the software works very well and it is easy to correlate and understand detected threats. It only takes time to learn how to use it well and configure it properly.
Read full review
Support Rating
From a product perspective, it's an 8.
I am still unhappy with the pricing model for the enterprise. Graylog competes against the likes of IBM and Splunk, but your still the new kid on the block. To price Graylog enterprise at 50k for 20GB ingest an unrealistic data. It would require multiple facets of Graylog to be stood up and only forward pruned logs to the paid version.
Read full review
Customer support is Good of IBM, While Using IBM QRadar its deployment is to slow and suddenly stop working and crashed we have contacted IBM Support and Rised a Ticket within a few minute we get call back from customer support and Query Resolved by them Fast And Rapid Support of Ibm
Read full review
In-Person Training
No answers on this topic
The training was very useful and the people who taught us were very knowledgeable. Although the software may initially seem difficult to learn they made things much easier for us.
Read full review
Online Training
No answers on this topic
The training was very useful and the people who taught us were very knowledgeable. Although the software may initially seem difficult to learn they made things much easier for us.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
Initial patience is required to learn how to use the product, and it takes a dedicated team to use it. One person is not enough, and it's not enough to just set it up and check it once in a while. It has to be used daily and kept under control to be used effectively
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Azure Monitor is not exactly what I mean, but I couldn't find Azure Application Insights. Anyway, for a large organization, Azure makes more sense than using Graylog because a lot of logging will already be inside Azure. And you don't want to have two "central" logging locations. But Azure is chaos and highly "not intuitive." So for small and mid-size organizations, Graylog is still the better option.
Read full review
I would always recommend Splunk over IBM Security QRadar SIEM unless you're trying to save money or only onboarding and normalizing well known data sources. IBM Security QRadar SIEM doesn't seem to handle RBA and complicated, chaining correlation rules very effectively and if I had to write a custom add-on for custom data, I found it easier to do so in Splunk.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Able to offer monitoring services to new and existing clients to increase revenue
  • Staff have increased billing percentage
  • Potential to expand security services
Read full review
  • Like any cybersecurity product, any money you don't lose on a prevented attack is money that you saved
  • Most of the apps are free and provides great enrichment like User Behaviour Analytics
  • Top quality alerts gives enormous value to the "passive" data that flows into the infrastructure
Read full review
ScreenShots

IBM Security QRadar SIEM Screenshots

Screenshot of QRadar SIEM Cloud native- Threat intelligence preview