Graebert ARES vs. Rhino 3D

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
ARES
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Graebert headquartered in Berlin offers the ARES suite of CAD applications. The product portfolio is anchored by the ARES “Trinity” of CAD Software for DWG-editing including ARES Commander for Windows, macOS and Linux computers, ARES Touch for Android and iOS smartphones and tablets and ARES Kudo, a full browser-based solution for DWG-editing in the Cloud. Graebert’s innovative approach is to combine these 3 solutions into a single ecosystem and subscription.N/A
Rhino
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Robert McNeel and Associates headquartered in Seattle offers Rhinoceros 3D (or Rhino 3D), a 3D modeling and design application. Rhino can create, edit, analyze, document, render, animate, and translate NURBS curves, surfaces and solids, subdivision geometry (SubD), point clouds, and polygon meshes.
$995
one-time fee
Pricing
Graebert ARESRhino 3D
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Rhino 3D for Windows & Mac
$995
one-time fee
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ARESRhino
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsDiscount available for students and faculty.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Graebert ARESRhino 3D
Features
Graebert ARESRhino 3D
Computer-Aided Design Software
Comparison of Computer-Aided Design Software features of Product A and Product B
Graebert ARES
-
Ratings
Rhino 3D
4.5
Ratings
45% below category average
3D Modeling00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
2D Drafting00 Ratings2.00 Ratings
Rendering and Visualization00 Ratings4.00 Ratings
Parametric Design00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Collaboration and Sharing00 Ratings1.00 Ratings
Compatibility with other software and formats00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Assembly Design00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Simulation and Analysis00 Ratings1.00 Ratings
Documentation and Annotation00 Ratings1.00 Ratings
Customization and Extensions00 Ratings4.00 Ratings
User Ratings
Graebert ARESRhino 3D
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.5
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Graebert ARESRhino 3D
Likelihood to Recommend
No answers on this topic
Rhinoceros 3D is very well-suited for buildings with repetitive bay layouts as a design can be quickly be updated (span, number of bay, height etc) simply by updating a couple numerical sliders. It is also well suited to quickly update one model (for example Revit) based on the changes in another model (either another Revit model or an analysis model). Rhinoceros 3D is not well-suited for teams that are not interested in learning GrassHopper as most of Rhino's value is in GrassHopper.
Read full review
Pros
No answers on this topic
  • Rhino3D is a great translator. I use it to take in customer models and then add optical components to it in a detailed and precise way.
  • Rhino3D has excellent workflow from curves to surfaces making the translation from optical to mechanical seamless.
  • Rhino3D can be paired with Grasshopper to create interesting and unusual geometry for aesthetic or functional purposes.
Read full review
Cons
No answers on this topic
  • Rhino has very limited sheet layout tools.
  • Grasshopper could be better integrated into the main interface.
  • Lack of backwards file compatibility can be frustrating.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
A majority of the support for Rhinoceros 3D does not come from the company itself, but from online forums and boards where other Rhinoceros 3D users outline their issues and solutions. The Rhinoceros 3D website does not offer much in-depth support and just outlines general how to's. At the same time, online forums allow for more specific issues to be addressed and solved by the Rhinoceros 3D community.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
Rhino is a generic platform. For BIM, you can combine it with Revit or ARCHICAD or look for extensions, such as VisualArq or the GeometyGym extensions for Grasshopper. Due to its good interoperability, I often use it for reviewing AutoCAD drawings or converting 3D models. That said, the most efficient and fast mesh modeling for non-organic geometry is still SketchUp, due to its many smart approaches to automatic mesh cleanup.
Read full review
Return on Investment
No answers on this topic
  • Personally a lot of really cool designs have made it into the real world thanks to my good friend Rhino. Being in the architecture, the ROI is elevated design through giving talented designers the right tool to pull it off.
Read full review
ScreenShots