RSMeans data, from Gordian (formerly Costworks) is a construction and estimation software offering acquired by the Gordian Group in 2014. It includes cost books and construction project estimating software tools.
N/A
monday.com
Score 8.6 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
monday.com Work OS is an open platform designed so that anyone can create the tools they need to run all aspects of their work. It includes ready-made templates or the ability to customize any work solution ranging from sales pipelines to marketing campaigns, CRMs, and project tracking.
$12
per month per user
Pricing
RSMeans data, from Gordian (Costworks)
monday.com
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Basic
$12
per month per user
Standard
$14
per month per user
Pro
$24
per month per user
Enterprise
Contact Sales
Contact us
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
RSMeans data, from Gordian (Costworks)
monday.com
Free Trial
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
Yearly plan: Save 18%
Monthly plan also available
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
RSMeans data, from Gordian (Costworks)
monday.com
Features
RSMeans data, from Gordian (Costworks)
monday.com
Estimating
Comparison of Estimating features of Product A and Product B
RSMeans data, from Gordian (Costworks)
7.8
Ratings
3% below category average
monday.com
-
Ratings
Takeoff tools
6.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Job costing
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost databases
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost calculator
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Bid creation
7.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
RSMeans data, from Gordian (Costworks)
-
Ratings
monday.com
8.9
Ratings
15% above category average
Task Management
00 Ratings
9.50 Ratings
Resource Management
00 Ratings
9.30 Ratings
Gantt Charts
00 Ratings
8.40 Ratings
Scheduling
00 Ratings
8.60 Ratings
Workflow Automation
00 Ratings
9.60 Ratings
Team Collaboration
00 Ratings
9.40 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology
00 Ratings
8.70 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology
00 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Document Management
00 Ratings
8.40 Ratings
Email integration
00 Ratings
9.30 Ratings
Mobile Access
00 Ratings
8.60 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking
00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Change request and Case Management
00 Ratings
9.60 Ratings
Budget and Expense Management
00 Ratings
9.10 Ratings
Professional Services Automation
Comparison of Professional Services Automation features of Product A and Product B
Again, CostWorks is very good at developing models of standard industry facilities/buildings, and it does this very accurately and efficiently. It is not a software that I would use to develop a very detailed line-item cost estimate that would possibly need several revisions to it over the course of the estimate deliverable cycle. And it would not be one I would use where the estimate needs to be broken down into phases or areas of construction. It just doesn't have these capabilities, and maybe it shouldn't. However, it is an excellent resource for running along side other estimating softwares in that its database of line-items is one of immense depth and as I stated before, I use it all the time in conjunction with my other client-specified softwares so that I can find line-items that those softwares just do not contain.
Here, I will suggest that it is best to create employees, clients, or project reports. Easy to track with the dashboards. I did many integrations and developments. I can not list each of them here. I will say the best tool for management. I couldn't see criteria of unsuitable. But yes It will depend on the client's requirements. I will suggest it as very user-friendly tool for CEOs, CTOs, Managers, and company owners also for team.
CostWorks is very good at generating quick and valid estimates for standardized facilities such as office buildings, schools, etc. It allows you to validate other cost estimates at the UniFormat level when doing an estimate validation.
CostWorks' database of detailed line-items is a very resourceful asset when it comes to finding a very specific line-item. Sometimes, when using Success or MII, I will have CostWorks open on the other screen so I can find an item that the other softwares just don't have and build it into the other software from the CostWorks entry.
CostWorks does a very good job of generating reports that are both well-developed and have enough detail at the summary level to be able to sit with a client or a project manager and have them follow along and understand without being overwhelmed with detail and numbers.
Ensuring I have set up a Private board vs public board is not clear - it would be useful to have an additional alert when creating a board as I work with sensitive information. It will eventually be used in a team based environment but while I test the boards, they needs to be private.
Time tracking is clumsy, could be easier to record
Teams involved in content creation, such as marketing or editorial teams, could use monday.com to manage the entire content lifecycle. Boards might track content ideas, assignments, drafts, reviews, approvals, and publication schedules, helping teams collaborate and keep content production on track.
It's straightforward to use and simple to understand. They have tutorials on different elements of the system that you can learn. The workflow there is very intuitive, drag and drop, which doesn't require a learning curve for most people. Templates that also make things more accessible can be found.
Everything performs fairly well. Every now and then there are user errors where an employee will not click "ok" on a note they've created and simply exit out (I do wish that something was in place to prevent this, such as a pop "are you finished?")
monday.com only really care about accounts that have 20 seats or more. While this is great for monday.com, it pushes smaller organisations to evaluate alternatives. We rate monday.com highly in our organisation because key staff have already got good experience with the application and we know we will get to 20+ seats one day. But, till then the billing model and lack of permanent enterprise features is a dread.
To have someone walk you thru the features and capabilities of Monday.com is priceless. Someone also coming along later in the contract to see if you are maximizing the program to suit your company needs is beyond helpful. The staff that have provided this training are fun, creative and very patient.
We signed up for the accounts. Created the accounts. Ran the trial version and tested it live while we were running multiple projects and found that it was fitting our needs perfectly. When the trial ended and we were asked to purchase the full version, we did. We have found other ways to use it and it's a breeze.
We decided to go with monday.com because they offered a free tier for nonprofits and because they are easier to use and offered additional features that we could not find on the other choices. Hands down, there was no better choice for us than monday.com.
For it to work across multiple departments and sites, I would like to see improvements made with integrations and automation. For this question, I am acknowledging not only the addition of internal triggers/automation, but also an expansion on external ones.
By using monday.com as an enablement tool for templated onboarding plans, we have been able to begin calculating the number of manager hours saved through our work (not defined yet).
monday.com's reporting tools also allow us to more easily report on the productivity and output of our team since we keep up with all projects and subitems in monday.com.