Flutter by Google vs. Vue.js

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Flutter
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
Flutter is an open-source mobile application development framework created by Google. It is used to develop applications for Android and iOS, as well as being the primary method of creating applications for Google Fuchsia.
$0
Vue.js
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Vue.js is presented as an approachable, performant and versatile framework for building web user interfaces. It is free and open source under the MIT license.
$0
Pricing
Flutter by GoogleVue.js
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
FlutterVue.js
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Flutter by GoogleVue.js
Best Alternatives
Flutter by GoogleVue.js
Small Businesses
Swiftify
Swiftify
Score 9.0 out of 10
React
React
Score 9.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Swiftify
Swiftify
Score 9.0 out of 10
React
React
Score 9.3 out of 10
Enterprises
Swiftify
Swiftify
Score 9.0 out of 10
React
React
Score 9.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Flutter by GoogleVue.js
Likelihood to Recommend
7.9
(17 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Flutter by GoogleVue.js
Likelihood to Recommend
Google
Flutter is well known for native app development, if you have android studio installed on your system, you can quickly start using it. This might not be the best choice for you if you do not wish to learn a new language, i.e. Dart and you do not know it already.
Read full review
Open Source
Building snappy UIs that customers love to interact with is what Vue.js is the best at. Secondly, the dev experience building those is above anything else in the field.
Read full review
Pros
Google
  • User interface design works great across all platforms, including native styling for iOS/macOS.
  • Native compilation for mobile platforms and a decent rendering engine results in slick apps that can make the most of your device.
  • Dart is a well thought out language and easy to pick up.
  • Makes cross-platform development of good looking GUI apps a doddle.
Read full review
Open Source
  • Reactivity
  • Interactive UIs
  • Composition
  • UI Libraries
  • Routing
  • SPA
Read full review
Cons
Google
  • Occasionally updates to the Flutter SDK result in wide-sweeping changes that seem to not be thoroughly tested and considered. Flutter sometimes evolves too fast for its own good.
  • While the 3rd-party Flutter package ecosystem is vast and rich, 1st-party support for basic things (audio/video playback, battery information, Bluetooth services, etc.) are lacking. You are occasionally forced to rely on an open-source package for use-cases that other platforms have native support for.
  • Documentation, particularly around testing, is lacking. While there are some great docs, like the Dart Style Guide, many Flutter-focused support documents are lacking in quality and real-world usability.
  • Flutter allows you to architect an app however you want. While this is a great feature, it also adds complexity and leads to the current state of Flutter's state management, where there are 50+ options on how to organize your app, with very little official guidance or recommendations from the Flutter team. For a beginner, this can create decision paralysis.
Read full review
Open Source
  • Router compatibility with composition API
  • Performance with very complex UIs
  • I don't have much to comment here
Read full review
Usability
Google
No answers on this topic
Open Source
I think with the composition API they reached amazing levels of DX, even though I think there should be more done to organize SFC better as 'script setup' makes them kind messy.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Google
I have experience with react and React Native. I would say that the idea behind all those frameworks are quite similar. However, I found the javascript-based frameworks a bit more accessible as you could utilise your javascript knowledge. Here, Flutter works with its own language. This has advantages and disadvantages sometimes. I found the community around javascript frameworks bigger and therefore sometimes more helpful. However, Flutter does a good job here as well. I think the main argument for Flutter is its usability for less experienced developers. If you do not have knowledge in javascript or other programming languages then I think it is much easier to start with Flutter than with another framework like react. I think the package that you get form scratch is better than in the other frameworks were you have to set up and learn a lot more before you can start.
Read full review
Open Source
The ramp-up is much quicker with Vue.js, while also making it easy to deliver features, without over-engineering them, while being on par with other features provided by React and other new-era web frameworks.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Google
  • The rapid development capabilities of Flutter allow us to build apps we could not have previously considered commercially viable, opening new revenue streams.
  • Free and open licensing made adoption very easy (ie. free/low cost!).
  • In comparison to Qt, our time spent arguing with build tools and perfecting development environments has decreased substantially.
Read full review
Open Source
  • Dev team velocity = quicker feature development = happy customers
  • Gives us a competitive advantage against our competitors (speed of dev + quality of UI)
Read full review
ScreenShots