Google Content Experiments (discontinued) vs. Nelio A/B Testing

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Google Content Experiments (discontinued)
Score 7.3 out of 10
N/A
Google Content Experiments was a tool that can be used to create A/B test from within Google Analytics. It has been discontinued since 2019, and Google now recommends using its Google Optimize service for A/B testing.N/A
Nelio A/B Testing
Score 10.0 out of 10
Small Businesses (1-50 employees)
Nelio A/B Testing is a website optimization solution for publishers, marketers, or anyone with a WordPress site. The service allows users to A/B test (also known as split test) alternatives of any element of a WordPress site to determine which version best achieves its marketing goals. Users can create two or more alternatives of any page, post, headline, widget or theme in a WordPress site and let our service automatically evaluate which one converts better (where a conversion could be a site…
$24
5,000 Tested Page Views
Pricing
Google Content Experiments (discontinued)Nelio A/B Testing
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Basic
$24
5,000 Tested Page Views
Professional
$74
35,000 Tested Page Views
Enterprise
$214
200,000 Tested Page Views
Larger Plans
$0
>200,000 Tested Page Views
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Google Content Experiments (discontinued)Nelio A/B Testing
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsWeb Agency Plans are available. Based on different combination of packages, number of client licenses, sites per client and tested page views, the price ranges between $230 to $6,200. Special discounts for Nonprofits are also available.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Google Content Experiments (discontinued)Nelio A/B Testing
Features
Google Content Experiments (discontinued)Nelio A/B Testing
Testing and Experimentation
Comparison of Testing and Experimentation features of Product A and Product B
Google Content Experiments (discontinued)
9.2
Ratings
11% above category average
Nelio A/B Testing
-
Ratings
a/b experiment testing9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Split URL testing10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Multivariate testing10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-page/funnel testing9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Cross-browser testing8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile app testing8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Test significance9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Visual / WYSIWYG editor10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Advanced code editor9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Page surveys8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Visitor recordings8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Preview mode8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Test duration calculator10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Experiment scheduler10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Experiment workflow and approval8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Dynamic experiment activation10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Client-side tests10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Server-side tests10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Mutually exclusive tests10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Audience Segmentation & Targeting
Comparison of Audience Segmentation & Targeting features of Product A and Product B
Google Content Experiments (discontinued)
10.0
Ratings
16% above category average
Nelio A/B Testing
-
Ratings
Standard visitor segmentation10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Behavioral visitor segmentation10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Traffic allocation control10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Website personalization10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Results and Analysis
Comparison of Results and Analysis features of Product A and Product B
Google Content Experiments (discontinued)
9.9
Ratings
16% above category average
Nelio A/B Testing
-
Ratings
Click analytics10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Form fill analysis10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Conversion tracking10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Goal tracking10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Test reporting9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Results segmentation10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
CSV export10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Experiments results dashboard10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Google Content Experiments (discontinued)Nelio A/B Testing
Small Businesses
Convert Experiences
Convert Experiences
Score 9.9 out of 10
Convert Experiences
Convert Experiences
Score 9.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Dynamic Yield
Dynamic Yield
Score 8.3 out of 10
Dynamic Yield
Dynamic Yield
Score 8.3 out of 10
Enterprises
Dynamic Yield
Dynamic Yield
Score 8.3 out of 10
Dynamic Yield
Dynamic Yield
Score 8.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Google Content Experiments (discontinued)Nelio A/B Testing
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
7.5
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Google Content Experiments (discontinued)Nelio A/B Testing
Likelihood to Recommend
Google Content Experiments is suited for large and small organizations, no matter your organizational goals. It is not recommended for organizations that are only interested in qualitative data, as there are other tools for receiving specific user experience feedback. It is also not recommended that you implement tests without some sort of goal in mind.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Pros
  • When you need to measure against event-based goals
  • If you need to see how the test variations performed against secondary goals
  • Given that the the platform requires you actually code a new page with a unique URL, this tool can be good for radical redesigns.
  • Great insights into other information about your testing groups, like whether or not they're mobile, screen size, browser, or really any dimension available in GA.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Cons
  • You can only optimise for one goal, so if you have several conversions, like phone call and email you need to do it manually.
  • It seems not to work that well for pages with lower amounts of traffic - not great for new or niche sites.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Likelihood to Renew
Content Experiments just makes it is simple and easy to implement A|B tests. We will be evaluating other tools in search of a more robust system for multivariate and cross-page testing, such as Optimizely or Visual Website Optimizer. However, for basic testing, you can't really beat it.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Using the free tool, overall "live support" is limited. However, there are plenty of online resources to get started. If you need handheld support, it is best to upgrade the service or hire a developer through one of Google's partner agencies. There could be more support for understanding what makes a test useful or not.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Google Website Optimizer was a better product but has been discontinued. We have also used Test and Target , which has more features but we have been doing fine with Google Content Experiments. Most testing situations can be handled with Google Content Experiments.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • Doing good experiments/Optimize has helped to take out the guesswork of the things we want to implement.
  • We have done fairly complex changes such as changing navigation and managed to see improvements outcomes immediately before we have to request developer.
  • Our teams have become more data centric in how they approach changes.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots

Nelio A/B Testing Screenshots

Screenshot of Different types of test one can createScreenshot of Screenshot showing the graphics that compare the performance of each alternative w.r.t. the original one.Screenshot of Screenshot showing the progress of a created test with Nelio A/B Testing