TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Google Container Registry vs. Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Google Container Registry

    Score8 out of 10
    N/AGoogle Cloud Container Registry is a place to manage Docker images, perform vulnerability analysis, and decide who can access what with fine-grained access control. Existing CI/CD integrations let users set up fully automated Docker pipelines.N/A

    Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes

    Score9.8 out of 10
    N/ARed Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes provides end-to-end management visibility and control to manage a Kubernetes environment. Users take control of application modernization program with management capabilities for cluster creation, application lifecycle, and provide security and compliance for all of them across data centers and hybrid cloud environments. Clusters and applications are all visible and managed from a single console, with built-in security policies.N/A
    Pricing
    Google Container RegistryRed Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Google Container RegistryRed Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    Google Container RegistryRed Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes
    Container Management
    Comparison of Container Management features of Google Container Registry and Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes
    Feature
    Google Container Registry
    8.5
    1 Ratings
    10% above category average
    Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes
    8.4
    1 Ratings
    8% above category average
    Security and Isolation9.01 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Container Orchestration6.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Storage Management8.01 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Update Rollouts and Rollbacks9.01 Ratings7.01 Ratings
    Self-Healing and Recovery9.01 Ratings7.01 Ratings
    Analytics, Monitoring, and Logging10.01 Ratings5.01 Ratings
    Cluster Management00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Resource Allocation and Optimization00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
    Discovery Tools00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Google Container RegistryRed Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes
    Small Businesses
    Mirantis Kubernetes Engine
    Score9.4 out of 10
    Mirantis Kubernetes Engine
    Score9.4 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS)
    Score8.5 out of 10
    Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS)
    Score8.5 out of 10
    Enterprises
    IBM Cloud Kubernetes Service
    Score7.4 out of 10
    IBM Cloud Kubernetes Service
    Score7.4 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Google Container RegistryRed Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Google Container RegistryRed Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Google
    As a Cloud Engineer while working on a migration project we used GCR and my experience of using it is actually good the reason behind this is: 1: GCR uses industry-standard encryption to protect your data.2: GCR offers data loss prevention features to help you prevent sensitive data from being leaked or exposed and last but not the least is GCR provides audit logging so you can track who has accessed your data and when, because of these reasons its my go to tool.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Red Hat
    Well suited for - Large-scale Edge deployments of OpenShift instances. Policy-based consistency for all workloads is Less appropriate for - Small-scale deployments. Stand-alone deployments of K8s clusters. Deployments in the same data center.
    Read full review
    Pros
    Google
    • Object Immutability feature allows us to protect our code and backups from accidental or malicious changes.
    • Data loss prevention feature helps us to prevent sensitive data from being leaked or exposed.
    • GCR has support for machine learning which is in my opinion is best .
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Red Hat
    • Continuous deployment of other OpenShift instances.
    • Controls clusters and applications from a single console.
    • Built-in Security & compliance.
    Read full review
    Cons
    Google
    • The one area which i think GCR lacks is that it currently supports a limited number of file types
    • The major flaw a felt while working on it is it does not have feature of object versioning and object locking
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Red Hat
    • Initial deployment of the ACM itself needs to be made easy.
    • Dependency on the Software versions of underlying open shift workloads during upgrades.
    • LCM of ACM itself.
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Google
    It is very easy to integrate GCR with other services and I integrated GCR with GKE and Cloud Build. 1: While working on one project I created one pipeline pulls the app's Docker image from GCR and builds the app's Docker image. Deployed that apps image in GKE. 2: Ive stored the data in GCR and that data was being used by cloud Run applications
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Red Hat
    I have also used TNA by Google Cloud, but that is not mature enough as ACM. Right now, ACM is the best choice as a cluster manager for private cloud data centers.
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Google
    • As a DevOps Engineer , GCR has made a important contribution to my organisation because GCR can be used to store code and assets, which can help to reduce the development time for new projects.
    • Using GCR has bee­n a cost-effective solution for us since­ we only pay for the storage we­ actually utilise. This has resulted in significant savings on our cloud storage­ expenses.
    • We trust GCR be­cause they prioritise the­ security of our data by utilising industry-standard encryption. This assurance brings us pe­ace of mind, as we know our information is protecte­d.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Red Hat
    • Reduced the deployment duration of individual nodes by 50%.
    • Acts as a central manager for all the clusters.
    • Provides a lot of infrastructure options (storage, networking, etc) to build instances of your choice.
    Read full review
    ScreenShots