Google Container Registry vs. Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Google Container Registry
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Google Cloud Container Registry is a place to manage Docker images, perform vulnerability analysis, and decide who can access what with fine-grained access control. Existing CI/CD integrations let users set up fully automated Docker pipelines.N/A
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes
Score 9.8 out of 10
N/A
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes provides end-to-end management visibility and control to manage a Kubernetes environment. Users take control of application modernization program with management capabilities for cluster creation, application lifecycle, and provide security and compliance for all of them across data centers and hybrid cloud environments. Clusters and applications are all visible and managed from a single console, with built-in security policies.N/A
Pricing
Google Container RegistryRed Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Google Container RegistryRed Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Features
Google Container RegistryRed Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes
Container Management
Comparison of Container Management features of Product A and Product B
Google Container Registry
8.5
Ratings
9% above category average
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes
8.4
Ratings
8% above category average
Security and Isolation9.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Container Orchestration6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Storage Management8.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Update Rollouts and Rollbacks9.00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Self-Healing and Recovery9.00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Analytics, Monitoring, and Logging10.00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Cluster Management00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Resource Allocation and Optimization00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Discovery Tools00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
User Ratings
Google Container RegistryRed Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Google Container RegistryRed Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes
Likelihood to Recommend
As a Cloud Engineer while working on a migration project we used GCR and my experience of using it is actually good the reason behind this is: 1: GCR uses industry-standard encryption to protect your data.2: GCR offers data loss prevention features to help you prevent sensitive data from being leaked or exposed and last but not the least is GCR provides audit logging so you can track who has accessed your data and when, because of these reasons its my go to tool.
Read full review
Well suited for - Large-scale Edge deployments of OpenShift instances. Policy-based consistency for all workloads is Less appropriate for - Small-scale deployments. Stand-alone deployments of K8s clusters. Deployments in the same data center.
Read full review
Pros
  • Object Immutability feature allows us to protect our code and backups from accidental or malicious changes.
  • Data loss prevention feature helps us to prevent sensitive data from being leaked or exposed.
  • GCR has support for machine learning which is in my opinion is best .
Read full review
  • Continuous deployment of other OpenShift instances.
  • Controls clusters and applications from a single console.
  • Built-in Security & compliance.
Read full review
Cons
  • The one area which i think GCR lacks is that it currently supports a limited number of file types
  • The major flaw a felt while working on it is it does not have feature of object versioning and object locking
Read full review
  • Initial deployment of the ACM itself needs to be made easy.
  • Dependency on the Software versions of underlying open shift workloads during upgrades.
  • LCM of ACM itself.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
It is very easy to integrate GCR with other services and I integrated GCR with GKE and Cloud Build. 1: While working on one project I created one pipeline pulls the app's Docker image from GCR and builds the app's Docker image. Deployed that apps image in GKE. 2: Ive stored the data in GCR and that data was being used by cloud Run applications
Read full review
I have also used TNA by Google Cloud, but that is not mature enough as ACM. Right now, ACM is the best choice as a cluster manager for private cloud data centers.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • As a DevOps Engineer , GCR has made a important contribution to my organisation because GCR can be used to store code and assets, which can help to reduce the development time for new projects.
  • Using GCR has bee­n a cost-effective solution for us since­ we only pay for the storage we­ actually utilise. This has resulted in significant savings on our cloud storage­ expenses.
  • We trust GCR be­cause they prioritise the­ security of our data by utilising industry-standard encryption. This assurance brings us pe­ace of mind, as we know our information is protecte­d.
Read full review
  • Reduced the deployment duration of individual nodes by 50%.
  • Acts as a central manager for all the clusters.
  • Provides a lot of infrastructure options (storage, networking, etc) to build instances of your choice.
Read full review
ScreenShots