Google Cloud Run vs. IBM Cloud Code Engine
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Google Cloud Run | Score9.2 out of 10 | N/A | Google Cloud Run enables users to build and deploy scalable containerized apps written in any language (including Go, Python, Java, Node.js, .NET, and Ruby) on a fully managed platform. Cloud Run can be paired with other container ecosystem tools, including Google's Cloud Build, Cloud Code, Artifact Registry, and Docker. And it features out-of-the-box integration with Cloud Monitoring, Cloud Logging, Cloud Trace, and Error Reporting to ensure the health of an application. | N/A |
IBM Cloud Code Engine | Score9.4 out of 10 | N/A | IBM Cloud Code Engine is a fully managed, serverless platform that unifies the deployment of containers and applications including web apps, microservices, event-driven functions, or batch jobs. This serverless compute service aims to remove the burden of building, deploying, and managing workloads in Kubernetes so users can focus on writing code and not on the infrastructure that is needed to host it. With IBM Cloud Code Engine users can run any workload… | N/A |
| Google Cloud Run | IBM Cloud Code Engine | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | Optional | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Google Cloud Run | IBM Cloud Code Engine | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
100% Would buy again 8 Answers | 93% Would buy again 13 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
100% Delivers good value for the price 7 Answers | 92% Delivers good value for the price 12 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
100% Happy with the feature set 8 Answers | 93% Happy with the feature set 13 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 5 Answers | 91% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 10 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
100% Implementation went as expected 6 Answers | 93% Implementation went as expected 13 Answers | |
| Google Cloud Run | IBM Cloud Code Engine | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Container Management |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Platform-as-a-Service |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Google Cloud Run | IBM Cloud Code Engine | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Mirantis Kubernetes Engine Score9.4 out of 10 | IBM Cloud Foundry Score6 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS) Score8.5 out of 10 | IBM Cloud Private Score9.6 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | IBM Cloud Kubernetes Service Score7.4 out of 10 | AWS Elastic Beanstalk Score7.3 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Google Cloud Run | IBM Cloud Code Engine | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.2 | 6.3 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 8.2 |
| Usability | 6.4 | 6.2 |
| Google Cloud Run | IBM Cloud Code Engine | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew |
|
|
| Usability |
|
|
| Reliability and Availability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Performance |
| No answers on this topic |
| Implementation Rating |
| No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Contract Terms and Pricing Model |
| No answers on this topic |
| Scalability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Professional Services |
| No answers on this topic |
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | IBM Cloud Code Engine Screenshots |







