Google Cloud Contact Center AI vs. OpenText CX-E Voice

In a specific scenario in which I would not recommend it, it would be in a hospital, since the level of margin of error must be minimal, human lives are at risk and can cost dearly if Google cloud contact center AI fails, in the scenario in which I would recommend it, it would be in that of a legal company

Incentivized

When you have a small team, this works best. because you can't pay like a big organisation but still need the same features. OpenTeam brings us the best features of call-centre software, but at a cut price that we can afford and create revenue upon. This is an essential software, if anything.

Incentivized

• Google Cloud Contact Center AI is based on the same foundation infrastructure and services as Google Assistant, therefore, it is robust and flexible. The APIs are very well built and documented as well. Any newbie can start using the service with a very little learning curve.
• Seamless integrations are also a great add-on. Google makes sure that Contact Center AI service integrates well with leading customer service platforms which helps any user to use only the required functionalities from Contact Center AI and meanwhile use any other primary platform.
• Robust documentation which is always alive and is updated within no time is of great help! Google makes sure its end customers know what to do where and when in clear plain text and any issues/ bugs are also documented.

Incentivized

• Allow callers to leave a message or callback number and automatically reroute calls based on queue length and waiting time.
• We can build teams and use remote workers at the same time from different time zone.

Incentivized

• It's still in the beginning phase of sentimental Analysis and more data sets can really help during tough conversations.
• Automation can be made a little simpler and basic for anyone to be able to work on it.
• Each instance of the software can have its own AI learning for a wider range of real time issues.

Incentivized

• Provide more transcription service options. Specifically AWS.
• I think reports are severely lacking. Provide a mechanism for customers to create custom reports or allow odbc access to the database.
• Provide better API documentation.

Incentivized

We are happy with the implementation and functionality of the software and associated systems. In general, unless something better can replace this system we intend on continuing. We think the ease of systems implementation and integration adds value and substantiates the use and excellent functionality of the product and associated services.

Incentivized

Generally intuitive and easy to learn. I would like more guides but the learning curve is rather quick and makes the software rather an easy study for the average user. Generally, the support and functionality of the software make for a generally good outcome and easy implementation of the software and user experience.

Incentivized

Apart from reports, OpenText CX-E Voice ease of use is consistently excellent

Incentivized

Google is a known product that many have used and we didn't see any other competitors having the edge that they do in their products. This is seen in their customer service when it comes to learning how to use the product and they have the resources to self-learn it.

Incentivized

OpenText CX-E Voice voicemail is significantly easier to deploy and maintain

Incentivized

• Reduced the number of minutes spent by live agents on trivial queries.
• Our client saved thousands of dollars by using the AI contact center as now the agents spend most of their time solving real issues.
• Customer satisfaction got increased exponentially.

Incentivized

• Excellent Consistency
• High Scalability
• Complex to handle

Incentivized