TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Cloud BigTable

    Score8.4 out of 10
    N/AGoogle's Cloud Bigtable is a fully managed, scalable NoSQL database service for large analytical and operational workloads with up to 99.999% availability.

    $0.03

    per month

    Scylla

    Score9.9 out of 10
    N/AScyllaDB headquartered in Palo Alto offers Scylla, a NoSQL database alternative to Apache Cassandra available in Enterprise and Cloud DBaaS editions.N/A
    Pricing
    Cloud BigTableScylla
    Editions & Modules
    Backup Storage
    $0.026
    per month per GB
    HDD storage
    $0.026
    per month per GB
    SSD storage
    $0.17
    per month per GB
    Nodes
    $0.65/hour
    per month per node (minimum 1 nodes)
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Cloud BigTableScylla
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Cloud BigTableScylla
    Considered Both Products
    Google
    No answer on this topic
    ScyllaDB
    Chose Scylla
    Scylla has a quick learning curve (same as Cassandra) compared to other proprietary solutions like BigTable. It supports higher throughput and lower latency that other NoSQL databases like MongoDB, which sacrifice those features for more flexibility and unique features.
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    Cloud BigTableScylla
    Database-as-a-Service
    Comparison of Database-as-a-Service features of Google Cloud BigTable and Scylla
    Feature
    Google Cloud BigTable
    8.8
    1 Ratings
    2% above category average
    Scylla
    -
    Ratings
    Automatic software patching8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Database scalability10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Automated backups9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Database security provisions8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Monitoring and metrics9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    NoSQL Databases
    Comparison of NoSQL Databases features of Google Cloud BigTable and Scylla
    Feature
    Google Cloud BigTable
    -
    Ratings
    Scylla
    8.4
    1 Ratings
    5% below category average
    Performance00 Ratings9.11 Ratings
    Availability00 Ratings9.11 Ratings
    Concurrency00 Ratings9.11 Ratings
    Data model flexibility00 Ratings6.41 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Cloud BigTableScylla
    Small Businesses
    MongoDB Atlas
    Score8.2 out of 10
    Redis Software
    Score8.3 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Azure Database
    Score9.8 out of 10
    IBM Cloudant
    Score7.4 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Google BigQuery
    Score8.4 out of 10
    IBM Cloudant
    Score7.4 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Cloud BigTableScylla
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.2
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Cloud BigTableScylla
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Google
    Google Bigtable is ONLY suited for massive data sets which scale PetaBytes and TerraBytes. Anything under this can easily be done via dedicated VMs and open source tools. Google Bigtable is expensive and shall be used wisely. It should be utilised only where it is well suited else you would simply be wasting dollars and not utilizing its full benefits.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScyllaDB
    Scylla is well suited for high-throughput scenarios where keyed data must be read or written with consistently low latency. It's less appropriate for use cases requiring relational queries, secondary indexes, or more structured data sets.
    Read full review
    Pros
    Google
    • Analytics: is at Google's heart. No on can beat Google in this space and BigTable is one of its implementation of this. The insights you gain from BigTable are simply usable in your day to day activities and can help you make real difference.
    • Speed: Processing TBs and PBs of data under minutes needs real efficient platform which is capable of doing much more than just processing data. All this data cannot be processed by a single machine, but rather huge pairs of machines working in conjuction with each other. BigTable's implementation is one of the finest and allows you achieve great speeds!
    • Interface: is great. Google has segregated required task under logically placed buttons which takes no time by users to understand and get habituated.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScyllaDB
    • Low-latency reads
    • CQL has a familiar syntax
    • Parity with Cassandra
    • Practical features
    Read full review
    Cons
    Google
    • User interface's responsiveness: I understand so much is going on under the hood, but laggyness is acceptable if a workload is running or being processed. In case their is not workload being process, GUI should work blazing fast. I have faced this at times, and this becomes frustrating as well.
    • Nothing other than this - BigTable is quite efficient platform and does exactly what it is built for.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScyllaDB
    • Better documentation for best practices (e.g., how to effectively use connection pooling)
    Read full review
    Usability
    Google
    For big IT firms like us, data is very important and it only holds its value if it can make sense to us. Therefore, Bigtable's usability is priceless when it comes to decision making based on data.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScyllaDB
    Very easy-to-understand syntax--uses CQL (same as Cassandra), which has many similarities to standard SQL. There are some gotchas, however, that must be known during schema development.
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Google
    Google provides premium support services for BigTable which is absolutely blazing fast similar to Bigtable's performance.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScyllaDB
    The Scylla cloud support team is incredibly responsive and proactive.
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Google
    No answers on this topic
    ScyllaDB
    Scylla has a quick learning curve (same as Cassandra) compared to other proprietary solutions like BigTable. It supports higher throughput and lower latency that other NoSQL databases like MongoDB, which sacrifice those features for more flexibility and unique features.
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Google
    • Positive return on investment.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScyllaDB
    • Addresses latency requirements of our platform
    Read full review
    ScreenShots