TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Google Authenticator

    Score8.1 out of 10
    N/AGoogle Authenticator is a mobile authentication app.N/A

    WatchGuard AuthPoint

    Score9.2 out of 10
    N/AAuthPoint Total Identity Security provides businesses with a solution to protect user accounts and credentials. With multi-factor authentication and dark web credential monitoring, AuthPoint mitigates the risks associated with workforce credential attacks. AuthPoint adds an extra layer of security by monitoring for potential credential exposure in the dark web for both personal and corporate accounts.N/A
    Pricing
    Google AuthenticatorWatchGuard AuthPoint
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Google AuthenticatorWatchGuard AuthPoint
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Google AuthenticatorWatchGuard AuthPoint
    Considered Both Products
    Google
    Chose Google Authenticator
    I also have to utilize WatchGuard AuthPoint, as it's a proprietary MFA - so I'm stuck with it. Google Authenticator looks nicer, cleaner and doesn't require me to have individual apps for each service I need to access.
    Incentivized
    Chose Google Authenticator
    There are a few things to keep in mind when using Google Authenticator. Second, it's imperative that everything be kept as simple as possible. Many customers don't understand why they're putting up MFA, therefore adding further difficulty to their daily routines is always a …
    Incentivized
    Chose Google Authenticator
    Being under the google umbrella gives a level of reassurance to our users. It seems to be cleaner and easier to use for our users. Being able to use a product from an already known vendor helps onboard new users to the software. It is clean and easy to use, all of the users …
    Incentivized
    Chose Google Authenticator
    First, Google Authenticator meets the security requirements which should be considered "table stakes". Second, simplicity is critical. Many users don' understand why they are setting up MFA (or they just don't care), and so adding additional complications to their day-to-day is …
    Incentivized
    WatchGuard Technologies
    Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint
    AuthPoint is a good merge between Authy and Google Authenticator. Authy has a better push notification system while google auth has a better time based. AuthPoint is a perfect mix between the two, and if you need both, it is the obvious solution. Having integration …
    Incentivized
    Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint
    We use the Microsoft MFA also and I have used the Google Authenticator (only prior to the MS version being released, however). They are similar in terms of functionality of course, but I have not attempted additional integrations using SAML 2.0 or anything like that so cannot …
    Incentivized
    Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint
    I've used Duo, Authy and Google Authenticator for non-work-related accounts. I didn't have any say in initially choosing AuthPoint for our organization and haven't had any big enough reason to recommend we switch away.
    Incentivized
    Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint
    Google Authenticator has fewer features then WatchGuard AuthPoint, therefore I have not used the Google Authenticator solution a lot. But of course Google Authenticator is free so it is a good way to improve security cheaply but if you want to have a professional solution with …
    Incentivized
    Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint
    The ease of use AuthPoint offers is nearly unmatched, with all of the same (if not more!) security benefits.
    Incentivized
    Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint
    Due to the recognition and functionalities that Watchguard has in the market worldwide, it makes me feel safe when purchasing its products.
    Incentivized
    Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint
    WatchGuard is easily managed and has different features like DHCP within it, which can be managed easily
    Incentivized
    Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint
    WatchGuard offers similar performance to other authenticators but allows greater customization of the service and integrates with cybersecurity systems
    Incentivized
    Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint
    Watchguard Authpoint provides central management for us and all of our customers.
    Incentivized
    Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint
    WatchGuard AuthPoint is easy to manage and implement. It works really well with WatchGuard solutions.
    Incentivized
    Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint
    AuthPoint has a simpler and more intuitive configuration, added to the cloud administration that it provides us, without a doubt it is a point in its favor.
    Incentivized
    Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint
    FortiAuthenticator is OTP based only or 2FA. Whereas, WatchGuard AuthPoint has the flexibility of choosing OTP, QR, password, or Push notification. Fortitoken licenses are affixed to a single FortiGate unit and can only be used for FortiGate services only. Whereas WatchGuard …
    Incentivized
    Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint
    WatchGuard's AuthPoint has been a breeze to implement and manage as compared to other vendor solutions and its third-party integrations put it in on a level beyond comparison.
    Incentivized
    Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint
    We chose WatchGuard for two reasons. 1. We have been using WatchGuard appliances for many years and 2. The AuthPoint licensing prices are reasonable and fit our budget. So I would say that familiarity with WatchGuard products and knowing how good Watchguard support is were …
    Incentivized
    Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint
    WatchGuard AuthPoint in my experience has been far easier to setup compared to Duo which I have used extensively in the past, for both engineers and the end users
    Incentivized
    Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint
    Authpoint was an easy choice as we use WatchGuard firewalls. This allows us to set up two factor authentication for VPN access easily. With Work-From-Home becoming the norm [rather] than the exception, this extra layer of security is vital. It is nice that there are several …
    Incentivized
    Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint
    I've found most MFA applications function essentially the same. It's ideal to have all your accounts using the same platform for simplicity. WG's AuthPoint provides that compatibility.

    We're a WatchGuard Gold Partner and have been installing WG firewalls and Wireless Access …
    Incentivized
    Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint
    AuthPoint protects both cloud/app logins as well as, and most importantly, our corporate login (Active Directory based). WatchGuard AuthPoint gives the option of using hardware OTP tokens for corporate network login, as well as the mobile app which is simple to use, customise, …
    Incentivized
    Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint
    We have used AuthLite. WatchGuard has more options but I found it easier to use, easier to teach users how to use but cost is significantly more
    Incentivized
    Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint
    AuthPoint has a much broader use, where the competition falls short.
    Incentivized
    Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint
    WatchGuard AuthPoint is up there with the best of them like Duo.
    Since we use WG Fireboxes we decided to go with AuthPoint.
    Incentivized
    Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint
    It is better suited for smaller/medium sized businesses which is a large number that we support.

    We also like the push notification instead of having to read through lots of codes.
    Incentivized
    Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint
    WatchGuard has great documentation, and we use it in our product stack of firewalls which is why we thought it'd be a good compliment to use it for MFA. It was easy to use and setup with good documentation and support.
    Incentivized
    Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint
    WatchGuard was selected unanimously by our senior engineers and Technical Director.
    Incentivized
    Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint
    Honestly, other than free options and considering our investment in the WatchGuard product sphere, we were drawn to AuthPoint because of its integration with our existing WatchGuard tools. It's simple to manage and cost-effective, so we haven't had a reason to consider any …
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    94%
    Would buy again
    34 Answers
    96%
    Would buy again
    218 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    97%
    Delivers good value for the price
    35 Answers
    98%
    Delivers good value for the price
    206 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    89%
    Happy with the feature set
    32 Answers
    97%
    Happy with the feature set
    220 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    97%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    31 Answers
    97%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    190 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    97%
    Implementation went as expected
    33 Answers
    91%
    Implementation went as expected
    202 Answers
    Best Alternatives
    Google AuthenticatorWatchGuard AuthPoint
    Small Businesses
    WatchGuard AuthPoint
    Score9.2 out of 10
    Google Authenticator
    Score8.1 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    WatchGuard AuthPoint
    Score9.2 out of 10
    Cisco Duo
    Score9.5 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Symantec VIP
    Score10 out of 10
    Symantec VIP
    Score10 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Google AuthenticatorWatchGuard AuthPoint
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.0
    (46 ratings)
    8.7
    (220 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.5
    (20 ratings)
    Usability
    8.0
    (2 ratings)
    7.1
    (27 ratings)
    Availability
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.1
    (4 ratings)
    Performance
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.1
    (4 ratings)
    Support Rating
    8.6
    (8 ratings)
    7.0
    (52 ratings)
    In-Person Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.4
    (1 ratings)
    Online Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.7
    (2 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    7.5
    (13 ratings)
    Configurability
    4.0
    (1 ratings)
    7.3
    (3 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.2
    (3 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    5.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.1
    (4 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.1
    (4 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.1
    (4 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Google AuthenticatorWatchGuard AuthPoint
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Google
    Logging into my work accounts is where Google Authenticator works best. Also, I had a personal account get hacked. I had an account created to book hotels, but someone was constantly resetting my password. To prevent further hacking attempts, I set up Google Authenticator. I do not believe it would be appropriate for banking accounts.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    WatchGuard Technologies
    We use multiple authenticators at my company. We use WatchGuard AuthPoint just for our VPN for security purposes. The app works very well and over the past year we've only had a handful of issues with the authentication service, and these were resolved relatively quickly. We do have to remind people to enable push notifications from the app, or have the app open when they need to use it to authenticate, otherwise they won't get the push to approve. The biggest issue I've found is that people will forget to do this and then say that the VPN isn't working - the VPN is working, it's just that they didn't get/approve the push from AuthPoint in time.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Google
    • One strength is in how it checks identity to stop unwanted people from getting access.
    • Another strength is in cutting down on the frustration of users for the authentication process.
    • With the pandemic and needing to work away from the office it also provided additional security in keeping our network/infrastructure safe.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    WatchGuard Technologies
    • Works well with the free Authpoint client and the OpenVPN clinet.
    • Token management is simple and hosted completely in the cloud to reduce overall complexity
    • Setup was simple and and staighforward
    • Suppports several authentication methods we have used both RADIUS and SAML effectively, but ADFS, IDP, RDWeb, and RESTful API, and other custom apps are supported.
    • Geofencing for RDP has been very useful as it is independant of our firewall geofencing. This is quite useful for organizations like us who do not Geofence at at the firewall level so as to provide global access to resources on the DMZ.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Google
    • I once performed a factory reset of my smartphone which had Google Authenticator. I didn't have a backup for the device. When I restored my phone with the same google account, I was not able to restore the authenticator app settings. I had to add all the keys back into the app to use it. This is cumbersome, but I understand it is set up this way for security reasons.
    • I don't like the ease with which it lets you delete a key. If I accidentally delete a key, I am doomed to get my 2FA key reset, unless I still have the QR code saved somewhere.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    WatchGuard Technologies
    • Email support is SLOW unless I want to allow a stranger to access my production firewall. That is never allowed here, so our hands are tied in terms of being able to get support in less than 48 hours.
    • Again, support takes far too long because you refuse to employ any staff that works in US time zones during normal business hours.
    • There has to be another option besides: 1) you take full control of my systems or 2) I wait on SLOW email support that isn't that great.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Google
    It works as intended, easy to setup, free and gives you another level of security against any unwanted access or cyber attacks
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    WatchGuard Technologies
    Today to ensure our ISO 27001 certification it is important that we maintain this solution. Today it is part of the way any employee within the organization works, we no longer have any other way of working and it is the simplest way to ensure that access to the workstation is done with MFA.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Google
    It's as easy as opening the app and what I need it for is there. I don't have to fumble with other accounts or getting something else to open it for me. I have all the access that I need for the use of the app within seconds and I can get access to the info that I need.
    Read full review
    WatchGuard Technologies
    After initial setup, it practically runs itself. Onboarding new users is fast and easy as it should be. The AuthPoint mobile app is small and simple to use. The only reason I do not give it a 10 is that I frequently get complaints from end users that the AuthPoint app is "constantly downloading". In fact, it's not downloading anything and that what the users are seeing in the app is a timer for the 6-digit code that changes every minute.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    Google
    In terms of availability, I had not experienced any issues with outages or the product not working when needed
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    WatchGuard Technologies
    Has rarely been unable to use; if that were the case, it was operator error
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Performance
    Google
    The performance of google Authenticator is good and I have not experienced any slow downs
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    WatchGuard Technologies
    No apparent problem besides a couple of times that systems weren't working
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Google
    I have found Google’s support to be hit or miss. There are times when they are very responsive, and I get my issue resolved quickly, and there are times where a response from them takes weeks. There is no in-between. But my support experience with this particular product is nonexistent because I have not had a problem with it yet. Hopefully, we do not have any problems with it either.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    WatchGuard Technologies
    WatchGuard support is always quick and reliable. They have urgency levels that you are able to select when creating your support ticket, and they respond in accordance to the severity that you have set. I have never had an issue with getting someone on the phone in the same business day, even for very low priority issues.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    In-Person Training
    Google
    No answers on this topic
    WatchGuard Technologies
    It was an Onsite demo at the ditributor with the benefits of Watchguard Authpoint. Was very nice to see the abilities of the product. This Demo was a few years back, since then Authpoint changed allot. It is very nice for partners that you can get this demo without any aditional cost.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Online Training
    Google
    No answers on this topic
    WatchGuard Technologies
    We use the online training for all our employees. There are both sales and technical trainings available and there even is a technical certification. You can use this for the Watchguard Partner Program which can give you aditional benefits. Every now and then you have a webinar that discusses multiple Watchguard products.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Google
    It was easy to implement and it went very smoothly. No issues
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    WatchGuard Technologies
    the first time it takes more effort. It is helpful to already understand how each authentication type works. Then it's much easier to understand the MFA solution that you implement. It is useful to check the release notes from time to time and update the key parts of the Watchguard Authpoint. Authpoint Gateway, Logon App, RDWeb... Also, it's useful to set up notifications when something goes wrong or sometimes check the statistics of how many requests are being approved/denied, etc.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Google
    First, Google Authenticator meets the security requirements which should be considered "table stakes". Second, simplicity is critical. Many users don' understand why they are setting up MFA (or they just don't care), and so adding additional complications to their day-to-day is always challenging. When it is simple, it makes life a lot easier. Finally, trust (due to the brand name recognition, primarily) removes any notion of "what is this?" that the user may have from being required to install something on their personal device for work purposes.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    WatchGuard Technologies
    I would slot Authpoint (as a product) as better than ESET but not Duo. ESET has the same limitations as Watchguard in the OTP support. It also is an on-prem installed console rather than a cloud, which increases cost and maintenance requirements. The duo now supports standard OTP for admin accounts, so it can be managed by a team. Duo support however leaves a lot to be desired and gives Watchguard the edge
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Scalability
    Google
    The product doesn’t have any features of tools that can help it scale
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    WatchGuard Technologies
    We are a medium-sized company. We don't need rapid scaling.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Google
    • More secure data = less worried about a data breach.
    • Takes longer to log in, and if I don't have my phone then I have to go looking for it, so it really makes it so that you can't be without your phone, which in certain instances is annoying or not possible and can hold up work time.
    • Everyone is willing to use the same program because everyone likes Google—makes it easier to manage.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    WatchGuard Technologies
    • We currently have 300 users on Authpoint, and most of them use insecure passwords. Authpoint gives us peace of mind that we don't have to police individual employee passwords.
    • In line with the comment above, with so many people in our organization using insecure passwords, I'm sure that Authpoint has already saved us from many potential security breaches.
    • Security breaches can cost a lot of money. Preventing them saves the company money and helps to achieve our bottom line.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    WatchGuard AuthPoint Screenshots

    Screenshot of AuthPoint app - tokensScreenshot of Cloud management - dashboardScreenshot of AuthPoint app - push notificationScreenshot of AuthPoint - TokensScreenshot of AuthPoint Sign-In ScreenScreenshot of AuthPoint Users