GoDaddy Container-as-a-Service (ElasticHosts, Springs.io), discontinued vs. Kubernetes

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
GoDaddy Container-as-a-Service (ElasticHosts, Springs.io), discontinued
Score 7.1 out of 10
N/A
GoDaddy supported container management and container-as-a-service products, including (since 2016) ElasticHosts and Springs.io (e.g. Elastic Containers), are discontinued under those brands as of June 2020. However, GoDaddy development services, SDKs, and other projects are now hosted at GoDaddy Engineering and some are available open source.N/A
Kubernetes
Score 9.3 out of 10
N/A
Kubernetes is an open-source container cluster manager.N/A
Pricing
GoDaddy Container-as-a-Service (ElasticHosts, Springs.io), discontinuedKubernetes
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
GoDaddy Container-as-a-Service (ElasticHosts, Springs.io), discontinuedKubernetes
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsSprings.io is unlike other cloud hosting providers. Our reactive servers dynamically resize based on demand, and you only pay for your consumption, not your provisioning. This means you can save money and not sacrifice performance.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
GoDaddy Container-as-a-Service (ElasticHosts, Springs.io), discontinuedKubernetes
Features
GoDaddy Container-as-a-Service (ElasticHosts, Springs.io), discontinuedKubernetes
Container Management
Comparison of Container Management features of Product A and Product B
GoDaddy Container-as-a-Service (ElasticHosts, Springs.io), discontinued
-
Ratings
Kubernetes
8.4
Ratings
8% above category average
Security and Isolation00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Container Orchestration00 Ratings9.50 Ratings
Cluster Management00 Ratings9.50 Ratings
Storage Management00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Resource Allocation and Optimization00 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Discovery Tools00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Update Rollouts and Rollbacks00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Self-Healing and Recovery00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Analytics, Monitoring, and Logging00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
GoDaddy Container-as-a-Service (ElasticHosts, Springs.io), discontinuedKubernetes
Small Businesses
Portainer
Portainer
Score 9.6 out of 10
Portainer
Portainer
Score 9.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.3 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.3 out of 10
Enterprises
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.3 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
GoDaddy Container-as-a-Service (ElasticHosts, Springs.io), discontinuedKubernetes
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(0 ratings)
9.5
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
GoDaddy Container-as-a-Service (ElasticHosts, Springs.io), discontinuedKubernetes
Likelihood to Recommend
Unlike other providers, Springs doesn’t use a pre-built container solution, instead opting for their own software built from the ground up.
Read full review
Along with all the best features and support by k8s, the automatic container scheduling to worker nodes and also self-healing containers which is what I like the most. On the other side, when I was installing the k8s cluster on CentOS 8, it was quite difficult for me, but never mind it is working as we expected and it is a one-time effort. Especially, in my case, there are more than 7 application containers required to run and communicate with each other, so for us, Kubernetes is an optimal solution.
Read full review
Pros
  • Container hosting, cloud virtualization
  • Elastic capacity scaling and pay-per-use billing
  • Linux kernel containerization technologies for container isolation and control
Read full review
  • Complex cluster management can be done with simple commands with strong authentication and authorization schemes
  • Exhaustive documentation and open community smoothens the learning process
  • As a user a few concepts like pod, deployment and service are sufficient to go a long way
Read full review
Cons
  • Provide more options at lower costs
  • It would be nice to see that expanded out to more distributions. What would be potentially even better though is templates. Some hosts can deploy ready-to-run WordPress/Drupal sites, LAMP instances, ownCloud instances, etc. at the drop of a hat. If Springs could replicate this with their container hosting they’d immediately appeal to a much, much wider audience;
Read full review
  • Local development, Kubernetes does tend to be a bit complicated and unnecessary in environments where all development is done locally.
  • The need for add-ons, Helm is almost required when running Kubernetes. This brings a whole new tool to manage and learn before a developer can really start to use Kubernetes effectively.
  • Finicy configmap schemes. Kubernetes configmaps often have environment breaking hangups. The fail safes surrounding configmaps are sadly lacking.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
The Kubernetes is going to be highly likely renewed as the technologies that will be placed on top of it are long term as of planning. There shouldn't be any last minute changes in the adoption and I do not anticipate sudden change of the core underlying technology. It is just that the slow process of technology adoption that makes it hard to switch to something else.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
It is an eminently usable platform. However, its popularity is overshadowed by its complexity. To properly leverage the capabilities and possibilities of Kubernetes as a platform, you need to have excellent understanding of your use case, even better understanding of whether you even need Kubernetes, and if yes - be ready to invest in good engineering support for the platform itself
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Springs is drastically cheaper than running 4 OVH servers, and a little cheaper than running nano instances on AWS.
Read full review
As I said earlier also - - K8s manage the workloads better as compared to OpenStack in terms of reliability, observability & reachability. - K8s is not limited to only a single networking or storage solution as compared to OpenStack. - Networking (which is a key concept) is much simpler in K8s as compared to OpenStack. - It is possible to upgrade your applications without downtime in K8s but in OpenStack, you either have to divert the traffic or face an outage because you have to delete the whole stack & then recreate it.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • In the beginning I wasn’t sure what I should set it to for my web server, so I left it. After a while the Average usage area begins showing how much resource the container is demanding and from that more adequate limits can be set.
  • Springs is drastically cheaper than running 4 OVH servers, and a little cheaper than running nano instances on AWS.
Read full review
  • Because of microservices, Kubernetes makes it easy to find the cost of each application easily.
  • Like every new technology, initially, it took more resources to educate ourselves but over a period of time, I believe it's going to be worth it.
Read full review
ScreenShots

GoDaddy Container-as-a-Service (ElasticHosts, Springs.io), discontinued Screenshots

Screenshot of Springs are reactive servers which scale automatically to the load. That's why you don't need to pay for unused capacity at all.