GLPI is an IT Service Management software based on open source technologies. It is a suite for IT, project, financial and user management. GLPI can support companies of any size, and offers both on-premises and cloud (SaaS) solutions.
$23
per IT agent/per month
Snow Atlas
Score8 out of 10
N/A
Snow Atlas is a cloud-native platform built from the ground up to provide Technology Intelligence for today’s hybrid enterprises. Based on a microservices architecture and standardized APIs, Snow Atlas provides a unified foundation for Snow’s IT asset management, SaaS management and FinOps solutions. It can be used to display all of the technology in an enterprise's IT stack, or to find opportunities to enhance, optimize and efficiently manage technology assets and share data with…
N/A
Pricing
GLPI
Snow Atlas
Editions & Modules
GLPI Network Cloud
$23
per IT agent/per month
Basic
$1,455
for <10 IT agents; <500 IT assets
Standard
$4,365
for <50 IT agents; < 5000 IT assets
Advanced
$14,550
for >51 IT agents; > 5001 IT assets
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
GLPI
Snow Atlas
Free Trial
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
$1,200 per installation
No setup fee
Additional Details
Prices for on-premises support L.3 and editor´s guarantee depends on the number of IT agents and IT assets. The price for GLPI Network Cloud is unique price per IT agent/per month. IT assets are free of charge and unlimited on GLPI Network Cloud. End users are free of charge for both options.
—
More Pricing Information
Features
GLPI
Snow Atlas
Incident and problem management
Comparison of Incident and problem management features of GLPI and Snow Atlas
Feature
GLPI
9.0
2 Ratings
10% above category average
Snow Atlas
-
Ratings
Organize and prioritize service tickets
10.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Expert directory
8.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Self-service tools
9.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
ITSM collaboration and documentation
8.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
ITSM reports and dashboards
10.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
ITSM asset management
Comparison of ITSM asset management features of GLPI and Snow Atlas
Feature
GLPI
8.5
2 Ratings
3% above category average
Snow Atlas
-
Ratings
Configuration mangement
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Asset management dashboard
8.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Change management
Comparison of Change management features of GLPI and Snow Atlas
Feature
GLPI
9.5
2 Ratings
12% above category average
Snow Atlas
-
Ratings
Change requests repository
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Service-level management
10.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
IT Asset Management
Comparison of IT Asset Management features of GLPI and Snow Atlas
GLPI is well suited to an on prem environment, I work for a company that values open-source software and European solutions. I have no experience with GLPI cloud hosted solution or their support as we have in house devs that fix and improve our installation, their community in the support forum is excellent if you have a question or want advice on an issue.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
SaaS connectors are not always kept up to date usually when Publishers make changes to their Portal API's. Appears to be little active monitoring on Flexera/Snow Atlas' side unless a customer reports an issue with the data being returned. Fixes are normally implemented as as quickly as possible, depending on whether it is considered a Bug Fix or a Feature Enhancement.
Users - Snow on SAM - No ability to add or bulk import manually. Completely reliant on AD Discovery or Entra ID Discovery
Users - SaaS module - No ability for bulk update of Users for things line 'Online only' or 'Qualified' user accounts. This is an issue in larger companies where you have thousands of SaaS Users being reported through connectors like Microsoft E365.
SaaS module Dashboard does not allow for filtering of insights to a specific Publisher.
Not all Back end SMACC functionality form Snow License Manager have been exposed to the front-end access, as Snow Atlas does not allow customer Administrators access to the back end or SQL databases.
If you are migrating from on-prem Snow License Manager to Atlas, migration tools have not been created by Snow and will require a Project to handle your migration. Without Migration tools, we had to use a Managed Service Partner who had to manually create a lot of their own scripts to retrieve data that cannot be downloaded via reports and imported into Atlas. Any attachments documentation on Agreement or License Records has to be manually re-attached/uploaded to the relevant Agreement/License records in Atlas as the migration was performed.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
We’ve used GLPI for many years and the interface has gotten better with every major release, the dashboard is easy to use and customizable.
With the massive catalogue of plugins, you can change or add so many features and if you have the right team, you can turn it into a completely unique piece of software.
So, if the default setup isn’t to your liking you can tweak it extensively.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Front line support staff done always understand the issue you are explaining or the need to escalate to back end/higher up areas for resolutions and can often require use of the Escalate function or emailing to your Account/Customer Success Manager. That said, once an issue properly is understood, it is handled well.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
We should have spun up a Project to manage the implementation. Snow indicated to us the ease in which Snow Atlas could be implemented, however this did not factor in that we were migrating from their on-prem product Snow License Manager hosted through a Managed Servicer Partner. For a clean installation, your implementation can be quick and likely not require a Project. If you are migrating from another products or are a company that can have lots of stakeholders, fingers in the pie, hurdles/business processes that need to be adhered to, definitely use a Project to perform your implementation.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info