GitLab vs. Scout Monitoring
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GitLab | Score8.7 out of 10 | N/A | GitLab DevSecOps platform enables software innovation by aiming to empower development, security, and operations teams to build better software, faster. With GitLab, teams can create, deliver, and manage code quickly and continuously instead of managing disparate tools and scripts. GitLab helps teams across the complete DevSecOps lifecycle, from developing, securing, and deploying software. Differentiators, as described by Gitlab: Simplicity: With GitLab, DevSecOps can… | $0 per month per user |
Scout Monitoring | Score10 out of 10 | Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees) | Scout APM is offered to enable software developers to spend their time building products customers love by minimizing the effort required to identify and resolve performance issues. As a provider of Application Performance Monitoring (APM) tools, Scout states that their developer-centric approach pinpoints issues such as memory bloat, N+1 queries and other abnormalities, enabling customers to quickly resolve performance issues. | $19 per month 600k monthly transactions included |
| GitLab | Scout Monitoring | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | Optional | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| GitLab | Scout Monitoring | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
98% Would buy again 125 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
100% Delivers good value for the price 114 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
98% Happy with the feature set 126 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 81 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
97% Implementation went as expected 101 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| GitLab | Scout Monitoring | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application Performance Management |
| |||||||||||||
| GitLab | Scout Monitoring | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic |
| Medium-sized Companies | No answers on this topic | SolarWinds AppOptics Score8.1 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | No answers on this topic | SolarWinds Server & Application Monitor Score6.9 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| GitLab | Scout Monitoring | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.9 | 10.0 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 9.9 | - |
| Usability | 9.0 | - |
| Support Rating | 9.1 | - |
| GitLab | Scout Monitoring | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew |
| No answers on this topic |
| Usability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Reliability and Availability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Performance |
| No answers on this topic |
| Support Rating |
| No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Scalability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | GitLab Screenshots | Scout Monitoring Screenshots |













