GitLab vs. Plastic SCM
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GitLab | Score8.7 out of 10 | N/A | GitLab DevSecOps platform enables software innovation by aiming to empower development, security, and operations teams to build better software, faster. With GitLab, teams can create, deliver, and manage code quickly and continuously instead of managing disparate tools and scripts. GitLab helps teams across the complete DevSecOps lifecycle, from developing, securing, and deploying software. Differentiators, as described by Gitlab: Simplicity: With GitLab, DevSecOps can… | $0 per month per user |
Plastic SCM | Score8.2 out of 10 | Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees) | Plastic SCM is a full stack version control system that aims to make software configuration easy. It focuses on enabling dev teams get work done by facilitating branching, diffing and merging. The vendor says that for those purposes it provides cross-platform apps and GUIs with: Branch explorer Diffing and merging tools (both syntactic and semantic) On-premises and cloud repo management Code review mergebots (last mile… | $6.95 per user |
| GitLab | Plastic SCM | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | Optional | Optional | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | * Educational institutions receive a substantial discount on Plastic SCM licensing fees * Corporate/volume pricing is available * For more information, please contact sales at sales@codicesoftware.com | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| GitLab | Plastic SCM | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
98% Would buy again 125 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
100% Delivers good value for the price 114 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
98% Happy with the feature set 126 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 81 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
97% Implementation went as expected 101 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| GitLab | Plastic SCM | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.9 | 8.4 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 9.9 | - |
| Usability | 9.0 | - |
| Support Rating | 9.1 | - |
| GitLab | Plastic SCM | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew |
| No answers on this topic |
| Usability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Reliability and Availability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Performance |
| No answers on this topic |
| Support Rating |
| No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Scalability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | GitLab Screenshots | Plastic SCM Screenshots |













