GitLab vs. Mend SAST
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GitLab | Score8.7 out of 10 | N/A | GitLab DevSecOps platform enables software innovation by aiming to empower development, security, and operations teams to build better software, faster. With GitLab, teams can create, deliver, and manage code quickly and continuously instead of managing disparate tools and scripts. GitLab helps teams across the complete DevSecOps lifecycle, from developing, securing, and deploying software. Differentiators, as described by Gitlab: Simplicity: With GitLab, DevSecOps can… | $0 per month per user |
Mend SAST | Score6 out of 10 | N/A | Mend SAST (replacing the former DefenseCode ThunderScan) is a SAST solution for performing deep and extensive security analysis of application source code. Mend SAST requires almost no user input and can be deployed during or after development with integration into an existing DevOps environment and CI/CD pipeline. The SAST solution provides a way to automate code inspection as an alternative to the demanding and time-consuming procedure of manual code reviews. With Mend SAST it is possible to… | N/A |
| GitLab | Mend SAST | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
| No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | Optional | Optional | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| GitLab | Mend SAST | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
98% Would buy again 125 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
100% Delivers good value for the price 114 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
98% Happy with the feature set 126 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 81 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
97% Implementation went as expected 101 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| GitLab | Mend SAST | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic |
| Medium-sized Companies | No answers on this topic | SonarQube Server Score9.6 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | No answers on this topic | SonarQube Server Score9.6 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| GitLab | Mend SAST | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.9 | - |
| Likelihood to Renew | 9.9 | - |
| Usability | 9.0 | - |
| Support Rating | 9.1 | - |
| GitLab | Mend SAST | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
| No answers on this topic |
| Pros |
| No answers on this topic |
| Cons |
| No answers on this topic |
| Likelihood to Renew |
| No answers on this topic |
| Usability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Reliability and Availability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Performance |
| No answers on this topic |
| Support Rating |
| No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered |
| No answers on this topic |
| Scalability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Return on Investment |
| No answers on this topic |
| ScreenShots | GitLab Screenshots |






