GitHub Copilot vs. Windsurf

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
GitHub Copilot
Score 9.1 out of 10
N/A
GitHub Copilot is presented as an AI pair programmer, that plugs into the user's editor. It then turns natural language prompts into code, offers multi-line function suggestions, speeds up test generation, filters out common vulnerable coding patterns, and blocks suggestions matching public code.
$10
per month
Windsurf
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
Windsurf (formerly Codeium) is an AI dev tool that is self-hosted for security, with features including rapid code autocomplete, in-editor AI chat assistant, repo natural language search, end-to-end data encryption.
$15
per month 500 credits/mo
Pricing
GitHub CopilotWindsurf
Editions & Modules
CoPilot for Individuals
$10
per month
CoPilot for Business
$19
per month per user
Pro
$15
per month 500 credits/mo
Team
$30
per month per user (500 credits/user/mo)
Enterprise
$60
per month per user (up to 200 users & 1,000 credits/user/mo)
Enterprise (more than 200 uses)
Contact Sales
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
GitHub CopilotWindsurf
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Best Alternatives
GitHub CopilotWindsurf
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

PyCharm
PyCharm
Score 9.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies

No answers on this topic

PyCharm
PyCharm
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises

No answers on this topic

PyCharm
PyCharm
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
GitHub CopilotWindsurf
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.5
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
GitHub CopilotWindsurf
Likelihood to Recommend
Copilit is fantastic at the following: 1. Solving simple, well-defined problems, such as implementing an algorithm, manipulating a data structure, or string manipulation and regex. 2. Implementing simple APIs that are mainly CRUD in nature, with moderate business logic inside them, which may involve some processing or passing the data through an algorithm. 3. Implementation of well-defined activities, such as implementing a connection to an Oracle DB using Hibernate or JDBC, or implementing boilerplate code for a backend service to listen to Kafka events. It is not that great when it comes to understanding and implementing code in a proprietary DSL. It struggles when implementing a major feature across a complex codebase. I believe developers should also adopt the trust-but-verify paradigm when expecting highly secure or regulated code from GitHub Copilot.
Read full review
If you already have technical knowledge and understanding of coding, Windsurf could be a valuable platform to debug and rewrite code. It was helpful to me to expand coding, since I am not a traditionally programmer. I was able to enhance my base code and functionality much quicker than manually trying.
Read full review
Pros
  • Fills in popular functions that we use throughout our code base.
  • Offers solutions to bugs and errors in the code.
  • Reads the docs for things that we may have missed.
Read full review
  • Quick code isolation of sytax errors
  • quick suggestions on how to correct coding error
Read full review
Cons
  • Sometimes generates nonsensical code, "hallucination," which can require additional review and correction
  • Sometimes can contain security vulnerabilities
  • It is a paid service
Read full review
  • Windsurf is target to more medium to advanced users
  • Windsurf does fast debugging, but technical skills are needed.
  • Windsurf is not as intuitive as I initially thought.
Read full review
Usability
I feel that GitHub Copilot's overall usability is good due to its tight integration with Visual Studio and the workspace. However, developers expect greater ease of use, as there is a learning curve to realize productivity gains with the tool fully. I think there is room for improvement in GitHub Copilot's UI integration within Visual Studio.
Read full review
Windsurf is a good tool for developers with more than basic coding skills. I would recommend it as a tool to quickly mitigate coding errors and issues. I did not take a deeper dive into the integrated extensions, but the library of extensions appear to be solid. An experience developer could quickly launch this platform, scan and test coding, and resolve issues quickly. I did not test this for larger code sets.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
I used Cursor AI as well, along with CoPilot. Curson has its own AI editor, but Copilot works with almost every code editor. So I don't need to depend on just one editor, and I get the flexibility to choose my own editors. The billing is also good and doesn't require many coupons to write prompts.
Read full review
Windsurf would be more comparable to GitHub Copilot or Perplexity to me. I think it's more of a pure code debugging line by line than some of the other tools listed above, however, they all have some capabilities to rewrite and test new coding. It boils down to what toolset you are most comfortable with. I typically will work with two platforms with the same issue to see how it is approached and the differences.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • It has very positive impact in our organization, it saves lots of time.
  • Helps us to build more efficient and secure Apps.
  • Helps in fast product development.
Read full review
  • ROI is significant time saved from debugging, rewriting code, and testing
  • AI generated development can test executable code in a controlled environment
Read full review
ScreenShots