Finastra Fusion Treasury vs. SAP for Banking

Same as in question 1.

Incentivized

SAP [needs] a UI upgrade soon - it is getting difficult to operate, especially when huge transactions are involved. SAP's mobile application however gives easy access to data and we can address and search it when needed. This also helps to provide appropriate information to customers and I can update the transaction details on the go.

Incentivized

• It is very good in position keeping for Inter bank.
• It is very good in calculating risk assessment and risk rate of derivatives.
• The PnL calculation is good and easy to customize.

Incentivized

• Multi Deposit Management
• Credit & Loan Management
• Access Live Data

Incentivized

• Security features can be enhanced.
• Encryption features should be there.

Incentivized

• The think and thin ledger handling
• Regulatory compliance need

Incentivized

Having this software is the best thing that could happen to us, since we obtain treasury benefits that make us productive with quick results.

Incentivized

Direct banking-related software is not used but within [the] company, SAP is being used to interface with the Banking system.

Incentivized

• Payments to Bank Statements Reconciliation is efficient.
• Payment has been streamlined.
• Bank statement reconciliation has been streamlined.

Incentivized

• Robust solution, highly integrated, data protection, immense cyber security as positive.
• Highly complex to implement, the need [for] high knowledgeable consultants are negative impacts.
• Expensive for SME banks.
• High implementation costs.

Incentivized