Full Circle Insights vs. Oracle Moat Measurement

Very suitable for traditional SaaS businesses who have good adoption of Salesforce by their GTM teams. Connects well if sales teams use the opportunity object well in Salesforce. Less impactful if Salesforce adoption is poor or instance is highly restricted.

Incentivized

Moat Analytics is great when it comes to breaking down how creatives and total ad campaigns have performed. It gives us insight on what we can suggest to the client on what they can do better next time or continue to do that seemed to have attracted the most amount of interactions and clicks. Right now we do not use Moat for breaking down video metrics.

Incentivized

• The primary business problem solved for us was waterfall visibility across multiple channels
• The secondary business problem solved for us was the accurate attribution of marketing influence throughout the waterfall.
• The tertiary problem solved for us was the accurate tracking and visibility into lead initiated activity (response management).

• Breaks down how well each creative has done in a campaign.
• Allows us to see the progress of a campaign through its time live.
• Can easily be organized to pull the data you're looking for.
• Can export into an excel doc to then dig deeper and format and look at data outside of Moat.

Incentivized

• Full Circle needs to improve ABM reporting functionality - better reporting at an account level.
• Identify professional services partners to help with deployment and process improvement
• Better connect with Data Warehouses and custom attribution models
• Better connect with digital tracking tools such as GA, Doubleclick etc. without having to rely on UTM tracking from Salesforce

Incentivized

• I’ve experienced some issues exporting reports into an Excel doc and have to manually copy and paste data with can be very time-consuming.
• You have to manually wrap video tags with the MOAT pixel which can be a tedious process.
• Video and display are in separate interfaces so you have to export separately and then consolidate into one report.

Incentivized

Full Circle CRM has solved a major visibility problem for us that was the result of architectural differences between Eloqua and salesforce.com that cannot be solved by reporting alone. We rely on this visibility as much as the core systems themselves.

The vendor worked with us tirelessly, never complaining about our broken processes and bad data. In fact, they went above and beyond their responsibilities to assist us in the process re-engineering and the data clean-up

The instructor was the same person who guided our implementation so they not only knew their application but they were also familiar with our data and our specific configuration and processes within salesforce.com. They were able to provide customized instruction to match our needs and personnel.

When I look back at where we were on November 25th compared to where we were on January 25th, having been live for just one month, the difference is amazing. Our management discussions had already moved from discussing the validity of the data to the implications of the insights. As we approach the mid-point in our year, it is difficult to remember the old days when we could not see the road in front of us.

Full Circle's main competitors are standalone reporting tools which perform well and are a good first step into attribution. All tools require significant investment to improve your marketing data model and how you plan and execute campaigns. Full Circle is heavily married to Salesforce and takes advantage of Salesforce's reporting suite vs. visualizing in a standalone tool. This approach also works well if you prefer to visualize data in an alternative tool such as Tableau or Looker. The proprietary approach to visualization used by Bizible and BrightFunnel are less appealing to enterprise companies who are building a modern stack.

Incentivized

Moat and IAS seem to be front-runners to measure viewability in the digital media space. Using Moat allows you to measure a number of different metrics but is limited to viewability. IAS offers the same capabilities when it comes to viewability but in addition offers brand safety and ad fraud.

Incentivized

• Eliminated underperforming channels such as content syndication which accounted for up to 20% of spend
• Improved funnel velocity and inspection of Marketing to SDR handoffs
• Created an attribution model which provided better transparency to company leadership on marketing performance - unlocked more budget
• Good value product and ROI was positive within a year.

Incentivized

• It has given the media and analytics team more granular metrics to measure for campaigns that may have awareness objectives and no KPIs.
• Measuring view ability ensures that clients media dollars are being viewed by the targeted audience.
• Moat allows you to gain metrics that can be very insightful and how users are interacting with placements, creative, etc.

Incentivized