TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Fujitsu PRIMEQUEST Series

    Score8 out of 10
    N/AFujitsu now offers the PRIMEQUEST series of mission critical workload enterprise rack servers, available in the 2000 and 3000 series.N/A

    SingleStore

    Score7.5 out of 10
    N/ASingleStore aims to enable organizations to scale from one to one million customers, handling SQL, JSON, full text and vector workloads in one unified platform.

    $0.69

    per hour

    Pricing
    Fujitsu PRIMEQUEST SeriesSingleStore
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    OnDemand
    $0.69
    per hour
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Fujitsu PRIMEQUEST SeriesSingleStore
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Fujitsu PRIMEQUEST SeriesSingleStore
    Considered Both Products
    Fujitsu
    No answer on this topic
    SingleStore
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    97%
    Would buy again
    70 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    95%
    Delivers good value for the price
    62 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    97%
    Happy with the feature set
    70 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    96%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    53 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    97%
    Implementation went as expected
    61 Answers
    Best Alternatives
    Fujitsu PRIMEQUEST SeriesSingleStore
    Small Businesses
    Dell PowerEdge
    Score10 out of 10
    Amazon RDS
    Score8.7 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Dell PowerEdge
    Score10 out of 10
    SAP HANA Cloud
    Score8.9 out of 10
    Enterprises
    IBM Power
    Score9 out of 10
    SAP IQ
    Score10 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Fujitsu PRIMEQUEST SeriesSingleStore
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    7.6
    (70 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.2
    (5 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.2
    (8 ratings)
    Availability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.1
    (2 ratings)
    Performance
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.2
    (44 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.4
    (9 ratings)
    Online Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.3
    (1 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.3
    (2 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.2
    (2 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.2
    (2 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.2
    (2 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Fujitsu PRIMEQUEST SeriesSingleStore
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Fujitsu
    Its cost effective. Its very well suited for huge data handling with zero downtime environment. Various business intelligence software can be used in very well manner with maximum uptime. Fujitsu PRIMEQUEST Series is using X-86 architecture with high reliability. But some models only available in all regions worldwide. other models are only available in Japan. Also learning resources need to be increased
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SingleStore
    Good for Applications needing instant insights on large, streaming datasets. Applications processing continuous data streams with low latency. When a multi-cloud, high-availability database is required When NOT to Use Small-scale applications with limited budgets Projects that do not require real-time analytics or distributed scaling Teams without experience in distributed databases and HTAP architectures.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Fujitsu
    • High availability
    • Operational efficiency
    • Ultra high speed data utilization
    • Effective handling of Bigdata
    • Business continuity
    • Efficient x86-architecture
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SingleStore
    • Technical support is stellar -- far above and beyond anything I've experienced with any other company.
    • When we compared SingleStore to other databases two years ago, we found SingleStore performance to be far superior.
    • Pipeline data ingestion is exceptionally fast.
    • The ability to combine transactional and analytical workloads without compromising performance is very impressive.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Fujitsu
    • The models PRIMEQUEST 3400E and PRIMEQUEST 3800E only available in all regions world wide. Other four models only available in Japan.
    • Complex architecture
    • Learning resources are very less
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SingleStore
    • It does not release a patch to have back porting; it just releases a new version and stops support; it's difficult to keep up to that pace.
    • Support engineers lack expertise, but they seem to be improving organically.
    • Lacks enterprise CDC capability: Change data capture (CDC) is a process that tracks and records changes made to data in a database and then delivers those changes to other systems in real time.
    • For enterprise-level backup & restore capability, we had to implement our model via Velero snapshot backup.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Fujitsu
    No answers on this topic
    SingleStore
    We haven't seen a faster relation database. Period. Which is why we are super happy customers and will for sure renew our license.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Fujitsu
    No answers on this topic
    SingleStore
    [Until it is] supported on AWS ECS containers, I will reserve a higher rating for SingleStore. Right now it works well on EC2 and serves our current purpose, [but] would look forward to seeing SingleStore respond to our urge of feature in a shorter time period with high quality and security.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    Fujitsu
    No answers on this topic
    SingleStore
    I really can't remember a time when it was not available
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Performance
    Fujitsu
    No answers on this topic
    SingleStore
    SingleStore excels in real-time analytics and low-latency transactions, making it ideal for operational analytics and mixed workloads. Snowflake shines in batch analytics and data warehousing with strong scalability for large datasets. SingleStore offers faster data ingestion and query execution for real-time use cases, while Snowflake is better for complex analytical queries on historical data.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Fujitsu
    No answers on this topic
    SingleStore
    The support deep dives into our most complexed queries and bizarre issues that sometimes only we get comparing to other clients. Our special workload (thousands of Kafka pipelines + high concurrency of queries). The response match to the priority of the request, P1 gets immediate return call. Missing features are treated, they become a client request and being added to the roadmap after internal consideration on all client needs and priority. Bugs are patched quite fast, depends on the impact and feasible temporary workarounds. There is no issue that we haven't got a proper answer, resolution or reasoning
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Online Training
    Fujitsu
    No answers on this topic
    SingleStore
    Would prefer in person training but for online training, it's almost as good as in person
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Fujitsu
    No answers on this topic
    SingleStore
    We allowed 2-3 months for a thorough evaluation. We saw pretty quickly that we were likely to pick SingleStore, so we ported some of our stored procedures to SingleStore in order to take a deeper look. Two SingleStore people worked closely with us to ensure that we did not have any blocking problems. It all went remarkably smoothly.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Fujitsu
    We are mainly going to Fujitsu PRIMEQUEST Series for high availability with cost effective. Using Fujitsu PRIMEQUEST Series is very simple than other similar servers. We can use several business intelligence applications without any issues in Fujitsu PRIMEQUEST Series. Latest equipped processors helps to achieve ultra-high speed data utilization. Also we are getting good customer support
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SingleStore
    Greenplum is good in handling very large amount of data. Concurrency in Greenplum was a major problem. Features available in SingleStore like Pipelines and in memory features are not available in Greenplum. Gemfire was not scaling well like SingleStore. Support of both Greenplum and Gemfire was not good. Product team did not help us much like the ones in SingleStore who helped us getting started on our first cluster very fast.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Scalability
    Fujitsu
    No answers on this topic
    SingleStore
    Very reliable. Coming from mariadb, singlestore has made our application more reliable and faster!
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Fujitsu
    • Cost effective
    • Good customer support
    • We didn't face any business impact till
    • Achieving customer satisfaction
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SingleStore
    • As the overall performance and functionality were expanded, we are able to deliver our data much faster than before, which increases the demand for data.
    • Metadata is available in the platform by default, like metadata on the pipelines. Also, the information schema has lots of metadata, making it easy to load our assets to the data catalog.
    Read full review
    ScreenShots