Fujitsu PRIMEQUEST Series vs. Lenovo Flex System Blade Servers

Its cost effective. Its very well suited for huge data handling with zero downtime environment. Various business intelligence software can be used in very well manner with maximum uptime. Fujitsu PRIMEQUEST Series is using X-86 architecture with high reliability. But some models only available in all regions worldwide. other models are only available in Japan. Also learning resources need to be increased

Incentivized

Smaller environments may not get the benefit of a BladeCenter. If you only have a few servers, it would be cost effective to just purchase individual servers. If you need to share a SANS, need high-level uptime and redundancy, or just have a need for lots of servers, then a BladeCenter would be beneficial.

Incentivized

• High availability
• Operational efficiency
• Ultra high speed data utilization
• Effective handling of Bigdata
• Business continuity
• Efficient x86-architecture

Incentivized

• Physical disks management
• Integration with VM
• Ethernet scalability without any lost compression.

Incentivized

• The models PRIMEQUEST 3400E and PRIMEQUEST 3800E only available in all regions world wide. Other four models only available in Japan.
• Complex architecture
• Learning resources are very less

Incentivized

• I wish we'd used this BladeCenter more because it simplifies IT.
• It could be my browser, IE. I click and wait till the screen updates and changes so I can do specific actions.
• If there's an urgent alert at night, I'd rather get an SMS.

Incentivized

They are reliable, safe and very profitable equipment, their operation is easy, they provide high availability as all their components are redundant and thus the continuity of the operation can be guaranteed wherever they are installed, in addition to having the option of gradual growth, you can start with a single node and grow until the chassis is full.

Incentivized

We are mainly going to Fujitsu PRIMEQUEST Series for high availability with cost effective. Using Fujitsu PRIMEQUEST Series is very simple than other similar servers. We can use several business intelligence applications without any issues in Fujitsu PRIMEQUEST Series. Latest equipped processors helps to achieve ultra-high speed data utilization. Also we are getting good customer support

Incentivized

I find that IBM/Lenovo servers are more robustly constructed and provide more comprehensive online technical specifications, which are useful for troubleshooting and budgeting purposes. Their gear is strong, solid, and trustworthy. Hardware problems are extremely rare for us. IBM/customer Lenovo's service is top-notch; it's always quick to respond and really helpful. Support doesn't have you answer a lot of questions before helping you. Since they recognize you as a server administrator with some amount of expertise, they can converse with you at that level.

Incentivized

• Cost effective
• Good customer support
• We didn't face any business impact till
• Achieving customer satisfaction

Incentivized

• This has been a positive return on investment due to improved resource utilization in the data center
• An opportunity to generate savings.
• Invest it in other operational needs.

Incentivized