Frosmo vs. Google Content Experiments (discontinued)

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Frosmo
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
Frosmo includes tools for precise user segmentation with various rules and combinations that can cover any requirements (and customization options as well), MVT testing with a special control group method, full website personalization without any work from the IT deparment, conversion tracking, conversion optimization, as well as targeting and re-targeting via ad campaigns, that are created within the product, using the same user segments. Integration via JavaScript.N/A
Google Content Experiments (discontinued)
Score 7.3 out of 10
N/A
Google Content Experiments was a tool that can be used to create A/B test from within Google Analytics. It has been discontinued since 2019, and Google now recommends using its Google Optimize service for A/B testing.N/A
Pricing
FrosmoGoogle Content Experiments (discontinued)
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
FrosmoGoogle Content Experiments (discontinued)
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
FrosmoGoogle Content Experiments (discontinued)
Features
FrosmoGoogle Content Experiments (discontinued)
Testing and Experimentation
Comparison of Testing and Experimentation features of Product A and Product B
Frosmo
7.5
Ratings
9% below category average
Google Content Experiments (discontinued)
9.2
Ratings
11% above category average
a/b experiment testing7.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Split URL testing8.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Multivariate testing7.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Multi-page/funnel testing7.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Cross-browser testing8.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Mobile app testing7.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Test significance7.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Visual / WYSIWYG editor8.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Advanced code editor8.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Page surveys6.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Visitor recordings7.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Preview mode8.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Test duration calculator8.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Experiment scheduler7.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Experiment workflow and approval8.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Dynamic experiment activation9.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Client-side tests8.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Server-side tests7.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Mutually exclusive tests8.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Audience Segmentation & Targeting
Comparison of Audience Segmentation & Targeting features of Product A and Product B
Frosmo
7.5
Ratings
13% below category average
Google Content Experiments (discontinued)
10.0
Ratings
16% above category average
Standard visitor segmentation8.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Behavioral visitor segmentation7.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Traffic allocation control8.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Website personalization7.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Results and Analysis
Comparison of Results and Analysis features of Product A and Product B
Frosmo
7.4
Ratings
13% below category average
Google Content Experiments (discontinued)
9.9
Ratings
16% above category average
Heatmap tool7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Click analytics7.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Scroll maps7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Form fill analysis8.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Conversion tracking8.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Goal tracking7.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Test reporting7.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Results segmentation8.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
CSV export7.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Experiments results dashboard8.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
User Ratings
FrosmoGoogle Content Experiments (discontinued)
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
7.5
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
FrosmoGoogle Content Experiments (discontinued)
Likelihood to Recommend
It was SO easy getting started. The fact that I was led through a step-by-step process when first joining was a GAME CHANGER. I have found it pretty easy to use for editing or creating email campaigns. It's good value for your buck!
Read full review
Google Content Experiments is suited for large and small organizations, no matter your organizational goals. It is not recommended for organizations that are only interested in qualitative data, as there are other tools for receiving specific user experience feedback. It is also not recommended that you implement tests without some sort of goal in mind.
Read full review
Pros
  • The RSS Email Campaign feature.
  • It is simple, intuitive, and easy to use.
  • The templates they have to create a campaign are great.
  • Dashboard is easy to understand.
Read full review
  • When you need to measure against event-based goals
  • If you need to see how the test variations performed against secondary goals
  • Given that the the platform requires you actually code a new page with a unique URL, this tool can be good for radical redesigns.
  • Great insights into other information about your testing groups, like whether or not they're mobile, screen size, browser, or really any dimension available in GA.
Read full review
Cons
  • Importing contacts is still buggy.
  • Customers on the free plan have restricted access to customer service.
Read full review
  • You can only optimise for one goal, so if you have several conversions, like phone call and email you need to do it manually.
  • It seems not to work that well for pages with lower amounts of traffic - not great for new or niche sites.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
Content Experiments just makes it is simple and easy to implement A|B tests. We will be evaluating other tools in search of a more robust system for multivariate and cross-page testing, such as Optimizely or Visual Website Optimizer. However, for basic testing, you can't really beat it.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
Using the free tool, overall "live support" is limited. However, there are plenty of online resources to get started. If you need handheld support, it is best to upgrade the service or hire a developer through one of Google's partner agencies. There could be more support for understanding what makes a test useful or not.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
Google Website Optimizer was a better product but has been discontinued. We have also used Test and Target , which has more features but we have been doing fine with Google Content Experiments. Most testing situations can be handled with Google Content Experiments.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • It helps me reach out to prospective clients every day
Read full review
  • Doing good experiments/Optimize has helped to take out the guesswork of the things we want to implement.
  • We have done fairly complex changes such as changing navigation and managed to see improvements outcomes immediately before we have to request developer.
  • Our teams have become more data centric in how they approach changes.
Read full review
ScreenShots