Firebase vs. Frontegg

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Firebase
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
Google offers the Firebase suite of application development tools, available free or at cost for higher degree of usages, priced flexibly accorded to features needed. The suite includes A/B testing and Crashlytics, Cloud Messaging (FCM) and in-app messaging, cloud storage and NoSQL storage (Cloud Firestore and Firestore Realtime Database), and other features supporting developers with flexible mobile application development.
$0.01
Per Verification
Frontegg
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
Frontegg is a user management platform, designed for the Product-Led Growth (PLG) era. Frontegg provides fast integration of a user infrastructure, and is designed to handle modern application use-cases. The platform supports app builders by covering all the way from fundamental authentication flows to advanced capabilities such as complex organizational structures (multi-tenancy), fine-grained authorization, API-token management, self-service admin portal for end-users, subscription…
$0
Up to 10 tenants
Pricing
FirebaseFrontegg
Editions & Modules
Phone Authentication
$0.01
Per Verification
Stored Data
$0.18
Per GiB
Free
$0
Up to 10 tenants
Growth
$250
Per monthly active tenants
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
FirebaseFrontegg
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
FirebaseFrontegg
Best Alternatives
FirebaseFrontegg
Small Businesses
Visual Studio
Visual Studio
Score 9.1 out of 10
Syncfusion® Essential Studio®
Syncfusion® Essential Studio®
Score 6.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Visual Studio
Visual Studio
Score 9.1 out of 10
React
React
Score 9.3 out of 10
Enterprises
Visual Studio
Visual Studio
Score 9.1 out of 10
React
React
Score 9.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
FirebaseFrontegg
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
7.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.3
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
FirebaseFrontegg
Likelihood to Recommend
Firebase should be your first choice if your platform is mobile first. Firebase's mobile platform support for client-side applications is second to none, and I cannot think of a comparable cross-platform toolkit. Firebase also integrates well with your server-side solution, meaning that you can plug Firebase into your existing app architecture with minimal effort.
Firebase lags behind on the desktop, however. Although macOS support is rapidly catching up, full Windows support is a glaring omission for most Firebase features. This means that if your platform targets Windows, you will need to implement the client functionality manually using Firebase's web APIs and wrappers, or look for another solution.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Pros
  • Extremely robust. Has about any tool you can think of under one roof making it extremely useful as a backup platform for data analytics or small teams that need something quickly.
  • Intuitive and easy UI/UX. Being made and owned by Google, you expect nothing less. Very easy to use for anyone that has any marketing or analytical experience especially in Google Analytics (which I just assume all marketers do).
  • Safe, secure, and sturdy. Never need to worry about downtimes or misinformation as it's as clean and safe as it is being run by Google.
  • FREE! What else is there to say. Unless you're an extremely large application handling hundreds of thousands to millions of users, this pay as you go plan will stay free.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Cons
  • Firebase/Firestore has very limited support for querying more complicated items; for example, performing a simple string search is not possible.
  • While upfront costs are low, costs can grow quickly if you're not careful about what you are being billed for.
  • Dashboards have at times shown different information to what is billed, and support from Google is less than stellar and not as effective as that from Amazon or Microsoft.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
Firebase functions are more difficult to use, there are no concepts of triggers or cascading deletes without the use of Firebase functions. Firebase functions can run forever if not written correctly and cause billing nightmares. While this hasn't happened to us specifically it is a thing that happens more than one realizes.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Our analytics folks handled the majority of the communication when it came to customer service, but as far as I was aware, the support we got was pretty good. When we had an issue, we were able to reach out and get support in a timely fashion. Firebase was easy to reach and reasonably available to assist when needed.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Before using Firebase, we exclusively used self hosted database services. Using Firebase has allowed us to reduce reliance on single points of failure and systems that are difficult to scale. Additionally, Firebase is much easier to set up and use than any sort of self hosted database. This simplicity has allowed us to try features that we might not have based on the amount of work they required in the past.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • Firebase has been able to help us understand reliably, the drop-off in our user flows with their funnel feature. This has made it easy for us to be able to pinpoint weaknesses in our funnel and test and optimize with data as the dependent variable.
  • From an economic standpoint, we don't pay for Firebase which is great, but as the saying goes "You get what you pay for" also holds true in this context. As we looked to grow and scale, we looked for a paid solution.
  • From a developer resource standpoint, Firebase has been extremely easy to integrate into our app. Whether it be the event tracking, dynamic links or crash reporting we have not had to waste too much developer time thanks to their well-organized developer docs.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots

Frontegg Screenshots

Screenshot of Builder style - Frontegg’s authentication layer includes a login box UI with a few clicks.Screenshot of Builder global - Authentication method can include a password, or no password.Screenshot of Auth settings - Where authentication and more advanced layers of security are configured.Screenshot of Emails - Customized transactional emails can be set up for user management.Screenshot of Roles and permissionsScreenshot of Admin portal - Frontegg’s admin portal serves as the end-users settings area, via a customer facing UI. The end-users experience is customized by toggling features in or out.