Foundry ABM is an account based marketing platform that creates campaigns for ads, web personalization, and sales. Foundry’s proprietary database complements an organization’s first party data to provide the best data to reach, engage, and convert more stakeholders in target accounts.
N/A
OpenX
Score 1.0 out of 10
N/A
OpenX is an ad serving platform. It is sold option as a hosted solution for can be purchased as an installed application. It allows for easy inventory management , geo-targeting of ads by country, and provides statistics for each ad placement.
N/A
Pricing
Foundry ABM
OpenX
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Foundry ABM
OpenX
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Foundry ABM
OpenX
Features
Foundry ABM
OpenX
Engagement
Comparison of Engagement features of Product A and Product B
Foundry ABM
7.5
Ratings
8% below category average
OpenX
-
Ratings
Automated routing and prioritization
8.20 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customer interaction histories
7.30 Ratings
00 Ratings
Syndicated content
7.30 Ratings
00 Ratings
Personalization
7.30 Ratings
00 Ratings
Engagement data tracking
7.30 Ratings
00 Ratings
Ad Campaigns
Comparison of Ad Campaigns features of Product A and Product B
Foundry ABM
7.2
Ratings
8% below category average
OpenX
7.0
Ratings
10% below category average
Ad campaign creation
6.70 Ratings
6.80 Ratings
Display advertising
6.80 Ratings
7.30 Ratings
Contextual advertising
6.40 Ratings
00 Ratings
Social advertising
6.40 Ratings
00 Ratings
Ad reporting and analytics
7.30 Ratings
00 Ratings
Ad deployment
00 Ratings
6.60 Ratings
Ad display and retargeting segmentation
00 Ratings
6.50 Ratings
Sequence targeting
00 Ratings
7.50 Ratings
Audience Segmentation & Targeting
Comparison of Audience Segmentation & Targeting features of Product A and Product B
Foundry ABM
7.0
Ratings
15% below category average
OpenX
-
Ratings
Standard visitor segmentation
8.20 Ratings
00 Ratings
Behavioral visitor segmentation
6.40 Ratings
00 Ratings
ABM sales intelligence
6.40 Ratings
00 Ratings
Intent Data
Comparison of Intent Data features of Product A and Product B
Foundry ABM
7.3
Ratings
7% below category average
OpenX
-
Ratings
3rd party intent signals
7.30 Ratings
00 Ratings
Downstream intent signals
7.30 Ratings
00 Ratings
Account identification
7.30 Ratings
00 Ratings
ABM Integrations
Comparison of ABM Integrations features of Product A and Product B
Foundry ABM
8.2
Ratings
2% below category average
OpenX
-
Ratings
Automated workflow & orchestration
8.20 Ratings
00 Ratings
Ad Network Integration
Comparison of Ad Network Integration features of Product A and Product B
Foundry ABM
-
Ratings
OpenX
6.6
Ratings
11% below category average
Data Transfer
00 Ratings
6.50 Ratings
DSP integration
00 Ratings
6.80 Ratings
Ad Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Ad Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Triblio is a relatively new platform for us, and it's our first ABM orchestration platform, so feedback is with those caveats. So far, the platform is well suited to targeting & serving ad messaging far more efficiently than we could ever do on our own. Triblio does NOT provide contact information like some "ABM/X" platforms do. Be aware of that. We understand and are OK with it - but some people confuse what an ABM platform should provide, and if you are expecting to have access to specific contact to enrich your targeting - that's not part of what Triblio does.
This is a wonderful product that is well supported and fully backed by OpenX. If you have green staff that require some training to get their foot in the door for basic ad management, this is a great tool. We've never utilized the OpenX ad market so I can't speak to the quality of the ads in that open market, but for in-house ads in complex networks with its targeting tools, this software would be more than suitable to fulfill your needs.
When it comes to RTB and spending on the open exchange market, the number one reason why we spend in one exchange over another is simple performance
When Open X doesn't perform which it tends not to, we have to shut that exchange off. This exchange tends to not perform at a CPA or CPC KPI and tends to not have the safest sites either.
Because I only use Open X as an exchange which I tap into from a DSP I can't speak to it's other capabilities.
The ability to separate budgets by dept. currently, you have one pot of money but can set limits based on campaigns. This is fine for a single user but gets messy with multiple users.
Campaigns with multiple steps, I do hear this is in the works.
It would be nice if each area did not open a new tab, navigating pages within the same page would be nice.
We continue to have a good experience with Triblio, and they continue to deliver value for our money. If they would do a better job with analytics, then it'd be easier for me to tie campaign activities to the bottom line.
I would renew use of OpenX as it is a solid ad serving platform that is easy to use, install, and maintain with some great advanced features that give more control to publishers ad ops teams large or small while reducing the costs associated with managing, serving, and delivering ads from third party vendors.
We have a cheaper version of Triblio, so we don't have all the bells and whistles. But, this works great for us. It's easy to use and the platform only includes things that we use instead of a handful of features that just slow it down. It looks like a simple version of Google Ads
I was given the system to use as part of setting up a whole new site from scratch in less than 2 months, with a large number of specialty hub pages to run ads on and lots of content I needed to run disease specific ads on. The system was easy for me to learn on the fly in a very compressed time frame. I would have loved more chance to really dig in under the hood to see all that it could do, but given how fast I had to work, I got everything up and running and looking great. And I did it ahead of my launch deadline too. My only reservation might be for people who are not as patient as I am in picking things up, or as hands on. Customer service was great if I needed them, and a quick start guide with the essentials would be ideal for those people.
The platform has always been available, and the occasional system updates aside, there have been no downtime issues with Triblio. The platform has always been available when I needed it, and campaigns were launched timely
Triblio pages, campaign performances, and platforms have not slowed us down at all. If anything, Triblio has enhanced how we engage with our target accounts. There has been no speed performance issues, or lag due to system limitations. Triblio tracking on our site has not slowed our page performances significantly, so there has been on effect on speed
If there's one thing Triblio excels at it's their support. We have an account manager that meets with us regularly to discuss any questions or even potential strategies. If we have questions that dive deeper into the software we've had an engineer get on the line with us. They are quick to notify us if bugs occur, and when they're fixed. They are quick to respond to emails as well. We are very supported by their team.
They went above and beyond without ever asking for additional money and we met our launch date and immediately started to meet and even surpass our business goals. Nothing was too much trouble, which really stood out compared to other companies I had and was at that time also working with. Customer service can really make or break any business; if i expect my staff to give good customer service, I expect to get it too, and Open X gave it.
We had our Account management team online to provide training to the marketing team, ADR team, and the AE team, which was helpful as each team had their own sets of questions and needs from the platform. Having the Triblio experts on the call and knowing that they are available for questions later on was reassuring to everyone in the trainings.
Definitely have a dedicated technical team work on the implementation full time with the Triblio team. There are requirements on both ends of the pipe that needs to be done. It is much easier to have both teams work together full time as opposed to part time duty; it would take much longer than doing it all in one shot.
As someone on the sales side, I don't know much about these tools' differences. However, I have had a very good experience with Triblio. It seems like it is more robust, and we can gain more information about our website visitors. I believe we picked them because of this reason.
Double Click, Adbrite before it became sitescout. We chose Open X because it was easy to integrate into the back end of our site and we liked the reports it provided and the ease of use. Double Click is a Google company, and frankly, while they are good at some technology, their products can be clunky failures AND we are not so sure we want to give them so much data about the inner workings of our business and keyword universe
The Triblio platform works fairly reliably since we have implemented it into our instance. There are the occasionally wishes that they have more functionalities, but those are feature requests which can be accommodated in future product enhancements. In terms of flexibility and scalability, we chose Triblio since we wanted to scale our ABM efforts, so that was a big part of our consideration.
The element of Sales Funnel in this tool is top-notch as it facilitates in keeping our sales team satisfied by augmenting prospects.
This product has proven to be an essential ingredient of success in my business, so if you want prosperity in your business, then this tool is worth trying.
OpenX made it easy to manage online advertising. At the time I used the product I was the lead developer in charge of implementing the solution but quickly was put into the role of managing the traffic and training other users. It was really easy for a technical user to become a traffic manager. Getting other users trained and up to speed was very efficient.