Fortinet Secure SD-WAN vs. HPE Aruba Networking EdgeConnect SD-WAN

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Fortinet Secure SD-WAN
Score 7.4 out of 10
N/A
Fortinet Secure SD-WAN supports cloud-first, security-sensitive, and global enterprises, as well as the hybrid workforce. Its Secure Networking approach uses one operating system and consolidates SD-WAN, next-generation firewall (NGFW), advanced routing, and ZTNA application gateway functions.N/A
HPE Aruba Networking EdgeConnect SD-WAN
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
The HPE Aruba Networking EdgeConnect SD-WAN platform addresses the challenges associated with backhauling cloud-destined traffic to the data center, thereby reducing the cost of bandwidth connectivity from the data center to cloud providers.N/A
Pricing
Fortinet Secure SD-WANHPE Aruba Networking EdgeConnect SD-WAN
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Fortinet Secure SD-WANHPE Aruba Networking EdgeConnect SD-WAN
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Fortinet Secure SD-WANHPE Aruba Networking EdgeConnect SD-WAN
User Ratings
Fortinet Secure SD-WANHPE Aruba Networking EdgeConnect SD-WAN
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Usability
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Fortinet Secure SD-WANHPE Aruba Networking EdgeConnect SD-WAN
Likelihood to Recommend
In the past Firewall and Traffic Routing tasks would have to be done on different interfaces, however, with Fortinet Secure SD-WAN all this is unified into one central console. We can get more productivity and also can optimize LAN & WAN IT Operations. We are also able to cut a lot of cost by moving from old MPLS technology to BB
Read full review
Have remote sites and need them to feel local? Want to get all your locations virtually on the same network? This is the way. And if you're like us and need an easy way to manage all your remote locations in one place this is the tool you want to use.
Read full review
Pros
  • Consolidated User Interface for Firewall, Routing and ZTNA
  • Optimization of WAN applications and traffic
Read full review
  • The software and web interface is nicely designed
  • Fewer bugs than some other competing services
Read full review
Cons
No answers on this topic
  • There are a lot of menus for items to hide under
  • Often there are alarms that are false positives due to bugs in the code - these are usually rectified in the next patch but that seems to be a common occurrence with updates
  • Can only have 7 "BIOs" - which are effectively policies that you use to choose how traffic is handled in terms of routing and QoS
  • Devices throughput is capped by Aruba licensing meaning that's an additional concern you'll have to monitor and take into consideration when choosing ISPs.
  • Alerts sometimes don't tell you things you'd like to know (like when a site is nearing its bandwidth cap)
Read full review
Usability
As mentioned earlier, since all features are pretty much available in one console, it is very user friendly and it becomes very easy for the Admin to just drag and drop a Plugin or a Tool that is required to perform a specific task. It's one of the most well designed layout to be honest.
Read full review
The product and its management as a whole are worth investigating for any kind of people interested in looking at new SD-WAN appliances. The devices possess a lot of capability for granularity which makes them much more advanced than other products I've worked with in the past. Ironically, for all the granularity though, this product is held back that you can ultimately only have 7 different policies for routing decisions. We've ran into instances where we wanted two sites to only share certain routes between each other (through the use of tags which are basically an arbitrary way to say this traffic is special) but then we had to collapse some of our routing decisions in order to make a specific route table for these two to be able which felt like a step back in the advanced routing decisions we had previously made
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
Prisma SD-WAN is a very simple solution to configure and maintain (so much to the point that in that environment, I questioned if my skills as a Network Engineer were needed). However it worked almost primarily on its own with very little input, by default and at the time of review had no way to do fully mesh (which was desired), and constantly suffered from memory leak. Its integrations were through the use of obscure tags and suffered from a "when it works - it works but when it doesn't - it doesn't and you don't know why" mentality. In contrast, HPE Aruba Networking EdgeConnect SD-WAN gives you a lot of insight into what is going on with the site, the integrations are done easily within Orchestrator (the control plane), and ultimately the product is typically a very stable product with many ways to configure and tweak the solution to fit your business needs.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • 18% improvement in Productivity
  • 25% reduction in cost
  • Almost zero down time.
Read full review
  • ROI is still to be determined as you have to calculate the existing hardware costs
  • Theoretically you could be saving lots of time managing all the hardware in between sites
  • SDWAN is still new and may take an entirely new budget to accomplish
Read full review
ScreenShots