Forcepoint CASB vs. Menlo Cloud Security Services

I would not recommend it as I think the product needs better integration with other Forcepoint products and better technical support. In some cases, Forcepoint closes my tickets without an answer. On the other hand, integration is useless in some cases. A working OCR would be appreciated in the future, as well as a better DLP. The admin webpage had some problems, sometimes it didn't load correctly. And don't even try to use it on a mobile, it never works. I think the product is good, but it needs better integration (and the integration should work!!) and in my opinion, it's not a finished product. On a scale from 1 to 10, I would give it a 5.

Incentivized

• Integration with Forcepoint DLP.
• Excellent in monitoring shadow IT.
• Cloud Monitoring can be conducted.
• UEBA is excellent.

Incentivized

• Better reports
• Better technical support
• Better integration with other solutions as proxy and onpremise DLP
• Did I say better support?

Incentivized

The platform is really good but needs a lot of customization and effort. Need to build an AI platform that will help in customizations.

Incentivized

The expertise is highly lacking in the implementation side.

Incentivized

The interface of both the softwares is complex, but Forcepoint is certainly more complicated. But once you get past that, it is quite smooth and offers a lot of amazing features. It is one of the best options for remote security, although I would love to see more features - like encryption. The one place where it truly lacks is customer service, and since it has such an intricate implementation procedure, this one carries a lot of weight and needs to be improved to make this software even more accessible.

Incentivized

• It has made remote security accessible and easy
• Allowed the prevention of data breach
• It was quite complicated in the beginning and caused our team unnecessary stress

Incentivized